Archive-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 00:13:37 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 00:12:09 CDT
From: "Hunter Goatley, WKU" <goathunter@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <0099133C.CD243CC0.353@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU>
Subject: MX-LIST Administrivia: Monthly Post

Posting statistics for list MX-LIST during May 1995

Total number of posts:                  81
Total number of posters:                46
Total number of subscribers:           254

Total number of digest subscribers:     53

Last modified:  7-JUL-1994 10:04  (Updated version info)

Welcome  to  MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU,  an electronic mailing list established
for the discussion of the Message Exchange mail software.

This is a routine posting you will see from time to time on MX-List.

MX-List postings are also available in a daily digest format.  To subscribe
to the digest, send the following command in the body  of a mail message to
MXserver@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU:  SUBSCRIBE MX-List-Digest "Your real name here"

The  MX-List  archives  are maintained at ARCHIVES@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU.  To get a
copy of any month's postings, send an e-mail message  with  the  body  SEND
MX-List.yyyy-mm  to  ARCHIVES@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU,  where  "yyyy" is the year and
"mm" is the numeric representation of the month.  For example, the  message
SENDME MX-List.1992-04 will send the archives for April 1992.

MX itself is available via anonymous ftp from ftp.spc.edu in [.MX.MX041].
You can also get it via e-mail by sending the commands SEND MX and SEND
FILESERV_TOOLS on separate lines in the body of a mail message to
FILESERV@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU.

To  remove  yourself  from  the mailing list, send the following command to
MXserver@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU:

  SIGNOFF MX-List

MXserver supports a few other commands for your convenience.  The following
commands can be handled automatically by the list processor:

 SIGNOFF MX-List       - to remove yourself from the list
 REVIEW MX-List        - to get a list of subscribers
 QUERY MX-List         - to get the status of your entry on the list
 SET MX-List NOMAIL    - to remain on the list but not receive mail
 SET MX-List MAIL      - to resume receiving mail from the list
 SET MX-List CONCEAL   - to not report your address in a REVIEW
 SET MX-List NOCONCEAL - to report your address in a REVIEW
 SET MX-List REPRO     - to receive posts you make to MX-List
 SET MX-List NOREPRO   - to not receive posts you make to MX-List
 LIST                   - to get a list of mailing lists served by WKUVX1
 HELP                   - to receive a help file

By default, subscriptions are set to MAIL, REPRO, NOCONCEAL.

If  you have any questions, comments, or suggestions about MX-List, please
contact the list owner at the address below.

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hunter Goatley, VAX Systems Programmer		goathunter@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Western Kentucky University
Academic Computing, STH 226			(502) 745-5251
Bowling Green, KY 42101
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 1995 22:53:47 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: hunt@blade.wcc.govt.nz (Martin D. Hunt)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: MX to UUCP filling disk
Date: Fri,  2 Jun 95 14:21:24 +1200
Message-ID: <3qlsif$3ea@golem.wcc.govt.nz>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

We are running MX V4.1 and DECUS UUCP. Recently we have had problems with 
the UUCP agent creating very large files with the name of MAIL.TXT, but not 
in any directory. The problem is caused by someone trying to send a file 
with very long records (and embedded <CR>s) from VMSmail to UUCP. The 
original files are about 200 blocks, but MX keeps on writing to the UUCP 
disk until it is full (it doesn't even bother stopping then).

The only way of recovering from this situation is to kill the MX to UUCP 
process and run ANALYSE/DISK/REPAIR. Is there a better fix available for 
this problem?

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin D. Hunt			This space contains nothing important
Systems Administrator		because I can't think of what to put.
Wellington City Council		hunt@wcc.govt.nz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 04:07:39 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 11:04:11 EDT
From: "Mario Meyer, Phys.-Techn. Bundesanstalt" <mmeyer@ChbRB.Berlin.PTB.De>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: mmeyer@ChbRB.Berlin.PTB.De
Message-ID: <00991461.0E2C5520.5@ChbRB.Berlin.PTB.De>
Subject: MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS

In Chapter 1.2 of Message Exchange Installation Guide is written 

An ``MX cluster'' consists of one or more VMScluster nodes
   that meet the following criteria:
...
    5.  The logical name MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS is defined to
        a value of at least 3. (Refer to VMS Mail Utility Manual
        for further information on MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS.)

This setting of MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS (Bit 1) has following effect:
           If the node is in the VMScluster, the system bypasses
           DECnet, and the message is written directly to the recipient's
           mail file.

I have running Mailbus on two nodes of the cluster (due to ressource reasons). 
When user send mail from another node in the cluster to MRGATE on one of these 
nodes MAIL tries to find MRGATE local due to the Bit 1 of MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS and 
fails. I think this problem is of common interest. 

My Questions are:	Which problems for MX will arise from resetting Bit 1 ? 
			Are there any other solutions ?

	Regards
		M. Meyer

--,------------------------------------------------------.------------------
  |  Mario Meyer   Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt |       .  ,       
  | .............   Institut Berlin        Referat IB.TI |       _QQ__      
  | : wide area :   Abbestr. 2-12,     D - 10587 Berlin  |    __( U,  )__   
  | : networker :  tel. (+49 30) 3481 442,  fax. ... 490 |   /// `---' \\\  
  | SMTP MMeyer@ChbRB.Berlin.PTB.De, BITNET MMeyer@PTBIB |  /||\       /||\ 
--| X.400  S=Meyer; OU=IB-TI; O=PTB; P=PTB; A=d400; C=DE |------------------
  `------------------------------------------------------'                  
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 05:22:38 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 11:18:38 BST
From: "John Hill, Cavendish Lab, Cambridge Univ. (01223-337243)" <hill@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00991463.12EB98BE.2@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS

>In Chapter 1.2 of Message Exchange Installation Guide is written 
>
>An ``MX cluster'' consists of one or more VMScluster nodes
>   that meet the following criteria:
>...
>    5.  The logical name MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS is defined to
>        a value of at least 3. (Refer to VMS Mail Utility Manual
>        for further information on MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS.)
>
>This setting of MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS (Bit 1) has following effect:
>           If the node is in the VMScluster, the system bypasses
>           DECnet, and the message is written directly to the recipient's
>           mail file.
>
>I have running Mailbus on two nodes of the cluster (due to ressource reasons). 
>When user send mail from another node in the cluster to MRGATE on one of these 
>nodes MAIL tries to find MRGATE local due to the Bit 1 of MAIL$SYSTEM_FLAGS and 
>fails. I think this problem is of common interest. 
>
>My Questions are:	Which problems for MX will arise from resetting Bit 1 ? 
>			Are there any other solutions ?
>
>	Regards
>		M. Meyer
>
	I don't know mailbus, so I can't tell if this helps, but in a 
homogeneous cluster, one can force the use of DECNET by secifying 
"__NODE01::USER" (ie. prepend the nodename with double underscore). I used
this technique when running Coloured Books (sic) on a single node, but wanting
to make the software available in the rest of the cluster (I used DECNET 
task-task to make the mechanism transparent).
                               Regards,
                                   John Hill

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
+  John Hill                         University of Cambridge,       +
+  E-mail: hill@hep.phy.cam.ac.uk    Cavendish Laboratory,          +
+  Phone:  +44-1223-337243           Madingley Road,                +
+  Fax:    +44-1223-353920           Cambridge, CB3 0HE, U.K.       +
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 02 Jun 1995 12:29:27 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 1995 14:59:08 -0100
To: <mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu>
From: Robertini@sns.it (Marco Robertini)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Help, normal users are not able to send message

Description: me and  system manager are able to do all. Other generic user
are able to receive, but if they send messages everywhere nothing happens.
This is log for my send:
MAIL> s
To:     marco@ux1.sns.it
%MAIL-E-USERSPEC, invalid user specification '@UX1.SNS.IT'

MAIL> s
To:     mx%"marco@ux1.sns.it"
  MX rewrote marco@ux1.sns.it as <marco@ux1.sns.it>
Subj:   test
Enter your message below. Press CTRL/Z when complete, or CTRL/C to quit:
This will arrive.
 Exit

%MX-I-MAIDLVR, message (entry number 12) successfully delivered to MX

MAIL>  Exit
$ ty [.router]mx_router_log.log
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:44.92 %PROCESS, Processing entry number 12
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.00 %PROCESS, Status from READ_INFO was 00000001
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.00 %PROCESS, Message originated in VMS Mail.
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.00 %PROCESS,  will run domain expander on envelope addresse
s.
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.00 %PROCESS,  Processing address: <marco@ux1.sns.it>
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.00 %PROCESS,    ... address now reads: <marco@ux1.sns.it>
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.00 %PROCESS,  will run domain expander on message headers.
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.20 %PROCESS, Updating the QENT source address.
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.22 %PROCESS, Finished VMSmail-origin preprocessing.
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.22 %PROCESS, Recipient #0: <marco@ux1.sns.it>
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.22 %REWRITE, No rewrite rules matched <marco@ux1.sns.it>
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.22 %FINDPATH, Site-spec expand on ux1.sns.it err=00000000
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.22 %FINDPATH, domain name UX1.SNS.IT matched path pattern *
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.22 %PROCESS, Rewrote <marco@ux1.sns.it> as <marco@ux1.sns.i
t>
-         next hop ux1.sns.it, path 2
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.27 %PROCESS, Adding to SMTP path: <marco@ux1.sns.it>.
 2-JUN-1995 14:40:45.37 %PROCESS, Path SMTP gets 1 rcpts, entry number 13
$

following wath happens from another simple user sending the same message:
$ ty [.router]mx_router_log.log
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.52 %PROCESS, Processing entry number 14
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.60 %PROCESS, Status from READ_INFO was 00000001
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.60 %PROCESS, Message originated in VMS Mail.
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.60 %PROCESS,  will run domain expander on envelope addresse
s.
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.60 %PROCESS,  will run domain expander on message headers.
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.85 %PROCESS, Updating the QENT source address.
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.86 %PROCESS, Finished VMSmail-origin preprocessing.
 2-JUN-1995 14:43:12.86 %PROCESS, Marking this entry as finished.
$
...and nothing more.

I have tried to give my privs to the normal user, but nothing changes.
I have mx 4.1 and alpha 6.1.

Please help me.

           Marco Robertini
Responsabile rete Scuola Normale Superiore
+39 50 509268             Robertini@sns.it


================================================================================
Archive-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 1995 05:13:12 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting MX to work with SMTP, DECnet and UUCP all at once
Message-ID: <1995Jun2.181512.369@tachyon.com>
From: wayne@tachyon.com (Wayne Sewell)
Date: 2 Jun 95 18:15:12 CST
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

In article <1995Jun2.223845.446@macro.demon.co.uk>, neill@macro.demon.co.uk (Neill Clift) writes:
> Hello,
>         I have been using MX for some time without any problems to receive mail
> using SMTP. I also used MX to queue up mail to be delivered to work over DECnet
> when I connect using DDCMP. We now have a few machines running UUCP and I would
> like to pass on a few mail messages send with MX over UUCP. I tried defining a
> path with path=UUCP but this still seems to be attempted to be delivered using
> SMTP. I read the doco for using MX with UUCP but can't see the answer.
> 
> What exactly does having a path of UUCP mean? I have managed to get incomming
> UUCP mail to be delivered to users using MX but you can't reply yet.
> Thanks.
>                                 Neill.
> -- 

A uucp path should do what you think: turn any messages with addresses 
matching the path over to uucp for transmission.  I have successfully used
uucp, smtp, and smtp_over_decnet transports simultaneously before with no
problem.  You just have to remember that the paths are processed in order.  The
first one that matches the destination address will fire and the message will
go out over that transport.


Here's the setup I am currently using:


Domain-to-path mappings:
  Domain="TACHYON.LONESTAR.ORG", Path=Local
  Domain="TACHYON.COM", Path=Local
  Domain="TACHYON", Path=Local
  Domain="curly", Path=Local
  Domain="LARRY", Path=Local
  Domain="MLVAX", Path=UUCP
  Domain="MOE", Path=Local
  Domain="*.TACHYON.COM", Path=Local
  Domain="*", Path=SMTP


With this setup, any of my own machines are flagged as local, the special case
of somebody@mlvax goes out via uucp, and everything else goes out over smtp.


So it *does* work.

Maybe if you would post your path configuration, somebody could see what was
wrong with it.

Wayne

-- 
========================================================================
Wayne Sewell, Tachyon Software Consulting   |wayne@tachyon.com
>>mail to pgpkey@tachyon.com for pgp key    |(214)-553-9760
Key fingerprint =  77 A5 C1 56 9C ED F1 8E  89 F9 27 3C 86 79 F7 1B 
========================================================================
Butler:"Gentlemen!"  Curly(as he and other Stooges look around):"Who came in?"
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 1995 05:34:38 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: neill@macro.demon.co.uk (Neill Clift)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Getting MX to work with SMTP, DECnet and UUCP all at once
Message-ID: <1995Jun2.223845.446@macro.demon.co.uk>
Date: 2 Jun 95 22:38:45 GMT
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Hello,
        I have been using MX for some time without any problems to receive mail
using SMTP. I also used MX to queue up mail to be delivered to work over DECnet
when I connect using DDCMP. We now have a few machines running UUCP and I would
like to pass on a few mail messages send with MX over UUCP. I tried defining a
path with path=UUCP but this still seems to be attempted to be delivered using
SMTP. I read the doco for using MX with UUCP but can't see the answer.

What exactly does having a path of UUCP mean? I have managed to get incomming
UUCP mail to be delivered to users using MX but you can't reply yet.
Thanks.
                                Neill.
-- 
Neill Clift  neill@macro.demon.co.uk
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Sat, 03 Jun 1995 12:38:05 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: Getting MX to work with SMTP, DECnet and UUCP all at once
Message-ID: <1995Jun3.091652.447@macro.demon.co.uk>
From: neill@macro.demon.co.uk (Neill Clift)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: 3 Jun 95 09:16:52 GMT
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

In article <1995Jun2.181512.369@tachyon.com>, wayne@tachyon.com (Wayne Sewell) writes:
[snip]
> 
> A uucp path should do what you think: turn any messages with addresses 
> matching the path over to uucp for transmission.  I have successfully used
> uucp, smtp, and smtp_over_decnet transports simultaneously before with no
> problem.  You just have to remember that the paths are processed in order.  The
> first one that matches the destination address will fire and the message will
> go out over that transport.
> 
> 
[snip]

Wayne,
        Thanks for this note. I tried to get this working again and I have
managed to get it working. I think my problems were the usual forgetting to do
an MCP RESET (the shame of it eh?) and not having a line of the form:

target = target.xxx.yyy

in u.target.

I supposed I could have rewritten user@target.xxx.yyy as user@target but I
might as well get the map entries right.

                            Neill.
-- 
Neill Clift  neill@macro.demon.co.uk
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 06 Jun 1995 15:51:13 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: shanksj@vax.sbu.ac.uk
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Broken mail queue, mailq sticks
Date: 6 Jun 95 20:22:49 GMT
Message-ID: <1995Jun6.202249.1@vax.sbu.ac.uk>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

HELP!

I am having a problem with my mail queue. When I run mailq it just lists out
two entries and then sticks. I have tried QUEUE/SYNC/RESET/LOG but that also
sticks. I hoped that if I tried QUEUE SHOW/FULL n for all possible queue
numbers that I would identify the duf queue entry. However this listed
everything and also identified queue entries which did not exist.

I have also tried to compress the queue but that got no further than making a 
new queue file and not closing it.   

It had a size of
MX_SYSTEM_QUEUE.FLQ_CTL;2
                          0/10035

What I need to know is how can I get the mail queue to work, and if it can not
be patched up, Is there any way to transfer entries for my currently borken
queue to a new queue.

Thanks

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
John Shanks    
Computing Advisor
Computer Services
South Bank University
London                              
SE1 0AA

Email shanksj@vax.sbu.ac.uk  		Phone 0171 815 6507 (Direct Line)
					Fax   0171 815 6599
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 03:33:56 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: dumortip@rc.bel.alcatel.be (Philip Dumortier)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: FAQ of vmsnet.mail.mx ?
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 07:38:31 GMT
Message-ID: <dumortip.16.2FD55776@rc.bel.alcatel.be>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Is there a FAQ about MX or VMSMAIL available somewhere ?
Philip


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Philip Dumortier, Antwerp, Belgium
Email: dumortip@rc.bel.alcatel.be
Phone: +32 3 240 8571 - Fax: +32 3 240 9932  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 05:31:32 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 12:23:22 EDT
From: Roadkill on the Information Superhighway <kloess@urlaub.fkt.icdc.fr>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00991859.F1E67A60.3@urlaub.fkt.icdc.fr>
Subject: RE: FAQ of vmsnet.mail.mx ?

>Is there a FAQ about MX or VMSMAIL available somewhere ?
>Philip

Unfortunately there is no FAQ for MX.


+-----------------------------+--------------------------------------+
I Ralph Kloess                I Internet <KLOESS@URLAUB.FKT.ICDC.FR> I
I Caisse des Depots GmbH      I Inhouse   KLOESS                     I
I Bockenheimer Landstr. 51-53 I Yell-Net ++49-69-97133-130           I
I 60325 Frankfurt             I Fax-Net  ++49-69-97133-101           I
+-----------------------------+--------------------------------------+
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 06:56:03 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: fx_andrew@galaxy.logica.co.uk (Andrew Black)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: MX in a mixed cluster
Message-ID: <D9swuw.7pr@carmen.logica.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 11:49:44 GMT
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

We are running MX in a cluster with two boot nodes.   
All the MX processes run on one node (which I will call MXNODE)
The agents are SMTP , LOCAL SITE, SMTP_SERVER , ROUTER and MLF.   
The MX EXEs and the queue files are all on the boot node for
this node.

Most of our users use the other boot node (or 
one of its satellites).  These nodes need to have 
the EXE's installed in order that VMS mail can 
get to MX%.  

This causes us problems when MXNODE reboots as it leaves  the 
disk in mount verify timeout state.    It seems to me like a good idea
if this node should have the relevant EXE's on its system disk, but still
use the queue file on MXNODE.    So my questions are
  - does anyone else have this sort of configuration
  - what are the EXEs that are needed by MX%
  - whats the best way of doing this.
(I dont want to have to hack MX com files if possible)

Thanks for the help

Andrew Black				Logica UK

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 10:19:21 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 11:16:34 EDT
From: "Jonathan E. Hardis" <hardis@garnet.nist.gov>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: hardis@garnet.nist.gov
Message-ID: <00991850.9D449C20.3@garnet.nist.gov>
Subject: RE: FAQ of vmsnet.mail.mx ?

>> Is there a FAQ about MX or VMSMAIL available somewhere ?

>  Unfortunately there is no FAQ for MX.

On the other hand, the documentation is very well written, and as questions 
arise in the newsgroup (on the mailing list), they are more than adequately 
covered in the documentation and release notes.

  - Jonathan
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 12:26:00 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 17:40:39 GMT
From: Howard Jeffrey <H.Jeffrey@cranfield.ac.uk>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <00991886.44E933C5.218@vulcan.ccc.cranfield.ac.uk>
Subject: mx smtpserver problem v4.1



Dear all,
  I am having problems with the smtp server holding open
a channel to my mailhub. The smtp server proc is HIBing but multinet sh/conn
still shows a link to the mailhub. When I mcp shut  the smtp server proc will
not die and stays in the HIB state. A bit odd.

Debug logiing shows that this job is to blame, I think. Looks a bit dodgy
what do you think.


cheers,

Howard.

STM[1]: Send "220 vulcan.ccc.cranfield.ac.uk MX V4.1 AXP SMTP server ready at Wed, 07 Jun 1995 17:31:07 GMT"
STM[1]: Receive "EHLO calisto.ccc.cranfield.ac.uk"
STM[1]: Send "500 Please identify yourself with HELO."
STM[1]: Receive "HELO calisto.ccc.cranfield.ac.uk"
STM[1]: Send "250 Hello, calisto.ccc.cranfield.ac.uk"
STM[1]: Receive "MAIL FROM:<etl@atc.boeing.com>"
STM[1]: Send "250 MAIL command accepted."
STM[1]: Receive "RCPT TO:<KK011@vulcan.ccc.cranfield.ac.uk>"
STM[1]: Send "250 Recipient okay (at least in form)"
STM[1]: Receive "DATA"
STM[1]: Send "354 Start mail input; end with <crlf>.<crlf>"
STM[1]: Receive "Received: from atc.boeing.com by calisto with SMTP (PP);"
STM[1]: Receive "          Tue, 6 Jun 1995 02:16:40 +0100"
STM[1]: Receive "Received: by atc.boeing.com (5.57) 	id AA05087; Mon, 5 Jun 95 18:25:29 -0700"
STM[1]: Receive "Date: Mon, 5 Jun 95 18:25:29 -0700"
STM[1]: Receive "From: Robert Brosa <etl@atc.boeing.com>"
STM[1]: Receive "Message-Id: <9506060125.AA05087@atc.boeing.com>"
STM[1]: Receive "To: b.s.gabri@cranfield.ac.uk"
STM[1]: Receive "Subject: Software for Wendy"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "sB@yB&"
STM[1]: Receive "3*\H0!C#JH7jTaqb18^FF#/J(D"
STM[1]: Receive "2nL C"
STM[1]: Receive "#kXxh1"O@"
STM[1]: Receive "J4(Q#H*]JtbA ^TSFNpd$Sf2l^M/XCcb |"
STM[1]: Receive ",{6L7en|A3&f^F[wn^G'W>l0ALR)ZEj8kW0c#,N1lJ`V,.]<Wi1"
STM[1]: Receive "[wi@)	3^j:ql3h[<qseN7pfT3f7\^
=}{wc'+.L1lEPoCFL0n<ovmy*}{x9"
STM[1]: Receive "+Vxd)*"
STM[1]: Receive "aF9yH[+{,}aH%.+8]k0VI&:e9W}{&qY&' 3kXbN(d?N"
STM[1]: Receive "&!76h<L~&o#uJY.%ra:&TbhB
3+,Ajj8KnY.j?.[RJ'QZ[kB<z:1j"QF1MQTKK"
STM[1]: Receive "tN(}J%RH0=tQK;ApCM4ltQN6DPLL7mtSPG-uT/+`VXg-uV\wmuW`}EV 6W|"
STM[1]: Receive "'BeP
BAsd'GHt<
8@CE&\9d2"
STM[1]: Receive "lBsxQUc[IO!"
STM[1]: Receive "T?s^27Qxv(?y1$`~Jh!>^)7_=x2@/m8C]b"
STM[1]: Receive "wb2PZ\p0J%.2n`aQ:}Z2MY(c&3@:$A}pq)\B*psHM[S0$ <}kud"
STM[1]: Receive "2,4+--sgR7"
STM[1]: Receive "[t.v2x ".[b#v88S@B*@""
STM[1]: Receive "N B"
STM[1]: Receive ";tCC}"
STM[1]: Receive "p8".Zk*p#=^;PnL>97XRAv{4a2MY]t30"
STM[1]: Receive "p*p6&beRh$NlDnO9bJs4wO{TO P=#48"
STM[1]: Receive "Cr^#:9%c"
STM[1]: Receive " /P># "
STM[1]: Receive "@s$\.rHh7>Fyh8VrWWih^sipi%'nxd	ddkilHvmhw$auxn7V  t&[pA"Ytx"
STM[1]: Receive "y}"
STM[1]: Receive "iye)$ql6i"
STM[1]: Receive "I8vsfKI$IY 	39we)D)ix5Q	;9@=9"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "OGbvDt% c@ip
LkAzy 'tBX, 
 ppGe:,`
i~Y!hkl@"
STM[1]: Receive ":#!"
STM[1]: Receive ":%_#Wj$A$[j$I*s$j`$J"
STM[1]: Receive "uyz zd"w! w"g d#rp np"
STM[1]: Receive "(!:3VKU"n@!JjN|i&:"J#ei!jCGSC S$bE	"
STM[1]: Receive ":,!jy'ZsiMGI*Z"
STM[1]: Receive "*Zs"
STM[1]: Receive " 8a"fJg@m qn:5&4*+4"
STM[1]: Receive "E!KK!K!"
STM[1]: Receive "!qJ#_34LP.c,5$$!e
!lp B^+2"
STM[1]: Receive "G!"
STM[1]: Receive ">k:!JJ4*8t- sz0{h:c,"
STM[1]: Receive "5-"
STM[1]: Receive ".C4*+A+7*/M<[[<x*"
STM[1]: Receive "&T;'WQ)Y[;R:y 7Mz:U:*0b 7n$9*7;=j^8 y0?u;x{4!$fP0bbJo+\!sK@v"
STM[1]: Receive "zP!zPIzP*z+u@)>l)ZsL%L&;Ei"
STM[1]: Receive "<rK>nz1m 3<1,%wQDs;Hm:H[DHjH|[jR*/d,"K,"6;v$k`$Gc{*Pb&mpJ&J/;;Z(k 9k P{98<;j.bpJ>l&j+&750j+SIc	 tq(nzikI{!M<Gk@4!h)ta.-W8a,254	JfL;;{Nz&_CT"!_OLTH.FNzIcW@Z  J E{ :!+;B(!:&ZO":%z")*,z</J 2z)	F&
STM[1]: Receive "R?$3j7kJJH*$u%"
STM[1]: Receive ";%]K%nj$WzY"
STM[1]: Receive "[z]9oZ:cJ4nt&Wk,;-H"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "**#**%{*^<*I+70*(2J+|y+,+L+Bj5V*,D"
STM[1]: Receive "*:);:&k:0{@3[;l-8+;< zp;A 7=F,j*Z9*j<e
=H$uZ=5t=*7 :=qS]>r]Kf>!WjA>_~>q;?0g?xQ'U+?Ij,~k91@8[@k"
STM[1]: Receive "<e"
STM[1]: Receive ",^
J^++L4`{ArALAnFkh#"&lJ,\2N:(f{Bz,C.579;=A, A=D<&G|W\ L<#~	E@KEyKag/gW>E
\E)z`\Ej0Fe|FzFk|ZW$s|(r)~o)ZhGWa)d	n)?J#'"
STM[1]: Receive "U|/~-}|$r|"
STM[1]: Receive ",yt{I/!L<7P{N_m#a}%^wBY	[
^8 i3|F"
STM[1]: Receive "xUlNiAlg+"
STM[1]: Receive "@	nNq	wg"<{_IM7wC.A"
STM[1]: Receive "~CEX\"
STM[1]: Receive " 
:`D4g!!L~Ny1A!("
STM[1]: Receive "!4"
STM[1]: Receive "IB|3q
T'U"Nd	q JD"
STM[1]: Receive "8`{;"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "RQ4RGI(eb:l`"
STM[1]: Receive "4GBx"
STM[1]: Receive "BvL"
STM[1]: Receive "z :D05d81`!M	[0'@
gC"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "4-d
?oNR]M->K
B*JJBE"
STM[1]: Receive "=bf;
)=e"
STM[1]: Receive "S*J@V;"
STM[1]: Receive "uTPhJ{H@I@"
STM[1]: Receive "k@<5 KBrp60H)<xe%/`"
STM[1]: Receive "
}BrrCQ"
STM[1]: Receive "R2$V`kfN@
*qX
Jb\"
STM[1]: Receive "\yIK}D
- ~pOj}PY?\a"
STM[1]: Receive "ZRi@
g#
>Ns+hM;tnTy4AE&1!txX:3((&!QVPN,bh"4 IjdXBe(=y@rPp*E%"
STM[1]: Receive "%DT>P JG.e= *Iz8Q"
STM[1]: Receive "EhHp"?tW)PI"EM("5
rN/:D5(=r	fPORDe(M!8 4QAyCa(m"Q@Fqh&D!A4:<pR(^2!z,bMCbBS(ZF3QNI[dW "
STM[1]: Receive "OOd<=

 mIN7ErL9gAl =+p@J3|O 'jeZ(U8T"
STM[1]: Receive "Q).|(N$r
z(*	a'+5nRiq@
uyTZHOjN;5\QN`ngn\53(SFQNM$oh41JhI@y#'ZiN"SZYU}gH*S3:L)PSj@5(M4X*ScGVj>f}&NFhktQ=+ja(6IG,'Qc}u"Q"
STM[1]: Receive "/T]AWhY_khg;"
STM[1]: Receive "4(7nU[ki"
STM[1]: Receive "&e6V_*]"
STM[1]: Receive "a%>].KVSv[O{n 4AcWf`P7}Koa"
STM[1]: Receive "Bwxj\k4B(
=w"zYMQ"
STM[1]: Receive ":>aM/S=9Xxb_"
STM[1]: Receive "[~["
STM[1]: Receive "kWM2qcIF\ON70puFH3P%&[	1HuAn7	:3v-9.$2"
STM[1]: Receive ""A:j>zMeYXC_j]ozgQ<D8*[EX8>.5U_W+)*Br]EFb@kM&GJrg^cg{@H>8/{J':REgI*
w~$:0q*RuyjX&KX?*V\5GY|?G,umVh
p+o|H
@9tZx@ik]uD&VEb1+JP,iUY:Up6]	[dToRN;R	$-4pxd:`O-~S?kT ,~5pve'Ix5!#t/FmBGxz6M<,
STM[1]: Receive "7s>=CExc}{|&/V]4fhg`,lc6t"
STM[1]: Receive "%z\[TKC^7M3XhIYyTKJ-Uyozgn\
H3M3_Y7;+Z!wvO>7QtaoE(R7e:&exgGEa<V;Ztp!Te9Y'WF/ZRA|J};V%e!PNrd(0E.>edRfGh.M
D4;^qjxE"
STM[1]: Receive "P~(@VeW;L`gsxvZ"
STM[1]: Receive "Ti]'uM:=kU(cf"
STM[1]: Receive "Pu	vX+ (Atwq $i^in&#u+-riq-z	?pe)i7psC
$ROfH[nj{a*M /"xq8D+UzCXi="
STM[1]: Receive "vd*`WX;$>%:X
*JrC>X21Tlr1"
STM[1]: Receive "lJ`3$'m"l+"
STM[1]: Receive "%/h&=*3M+7iJ{x."eVI]I)S^J%Jtl&:%%+1IKLC9\:	pjNMyPu^[:s,JJ~q054G_G!1UG)*]5wV^=@5<pwIlYr+@m60^@74L*jQjk_v/[X;n#"
STM[1]: Receive "
gY*rnrD9Gsb FxhX#~pwl B
K]~X?Ve;M
("
STM[1]: Receive "}87QN#!.|E27E\{A-q`^#_S$k=];Itv0NTWQpJYbB:Vp@qNR	[$+L!=|.1GgBq!+ ';/hOpeqU `T&`}
O	*V7*b 6mC"
STM[1]: Receive "gStv

?]^+T(/]6xP~k:)3WX^iu:'WUPT~U7<j"
STM[1]: Receive "'VB]-Z5Wv7%	{ybo(QdtRL`uYrQ?UMi9N3ZY6jes"
STM[1]: Receive "YGxi],#WoU_<rT{"<nB7Lzkk]8w}`	6UnBcoz#rrdKYx3#Y/q"
STM[1]: Receive "'afEx}GA!g
]a&y{J/Bjo:>#57_Ze|sqoq]E'P><{|pmUd+ZCoQR"
STM[1]: Receive "u|U|	lk<EYu@^>h*^Ei-="WowIY~2e=L~JB3&)\|50ZASdmmBV@p,7y"
STM[1]: Receive ""|RcrB#\4r`oyU|_Mge,`Y%oG1LY&+Wdj^2DJO~kK_kQ&ikm$]?~a}JH{'"
STM[1]: Receive "mjZ17'Y;:Xlx1"
STM[1]: Receive "PaNU'vt@ 8eAph`0hK
t"
STM[1]: Receive "\;8His\gH$+3@94m+"
STM[1]: Receive "%D1s^W<7oaB*"
STM[1]: Receive "mdXFrT^4dB[gALQ0,wF-L/K)W5K.goiNg'x	sF\QLe\B_"
STM[1]: Receive "fya19
y`'eP9
ha`mre cU5!\5wmsS%bTX\e(+u^47PU(j\;wpya9Bp\AX%|p^.PZs>WAms}ubs7@WAt@-' tUBG]5uVQaPF'#	U]HPQF7ZH69ZH'W!7?SM\tpxU3qKxhR"
STM[1]: Receive "o0\SQtiap9MkZ!7cuP' {4Mmc!wA7UuycSDu4MnG fGOnW &n"cV?ljC^Uce>_%BSz7^`*joLw2gy~=E"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "b6Vb"
STM[1]: Receive "8 ^w]h!2up7[
Eb[7BxWr[!x	[%
3e
Zb:%0I_>r^*7_i6d@&6R&bB47-9]ZpWaR4JF4T	o"
STM[1]: Receive "	HvG!fw(Z&|)j4rw|5J((V.BNG)jS=i{s7gD(@U`!TZDyAjYF%yu=`UaN(n
ZLIi|]	WQpa#n^'}	xc`JPv/cA!Wv!PWb"
STM[1]: Receive "hR'cQx^Scai,ZG$,bWdAy&W3 "m$io#e@	83du3"h7B7_(.sa`(b"
STM[1]: Receive "u!"
STM[1]: Receive "?!!i=h
UU.saS8<;#IF$gwhTy+J'/}_#	ga
$"M6d!y$nbH(!JiWJj"
STM[1]: Receive "hW[VF$`p5	b,6g<8-(@!(7E|\]VDRm ?	6Uw&`F8]vai62ng9>>% nv
Z
NPQ
Z# :)uf$k&<z1[HyABY$g	!eJJyq"
STM[1]: Receive "y!Oon}nc!07Av\S<an) sF"
STM[1]: Receive "ZzWC"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "qxADc6UiVWA_:1vbV1id9o"e,zYU );@:g
 }c<
}t%hwPgJ"tVEBtu1^w`dE@Jd!SdR J0bnE "
STM[1]: Receive "dh|!"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "$P'[9ZC1g a2Vp!	:#x';jea/V<"
STM[1]: Receive "W^X"
STM[1]: Receive "w&=ePvHdfQ?rLn"
STM[1]: Receive "agMG*4	arQ:4RJf
~MAY)5^be6RW`ZeNop[}FDe~0*4X|y`jp:BC0eZmj"
STM[1]: Receive "$z*95"
STM[1]: Receive "#J`EvjV,$)G"ael8|0_n($Q,Y%]b<a|^%Xi'"
STM[1]: Receive "\e'%cx'	
"
STM[1]: Receive "> %/I4Z%aiXFZ\i!YeRG!	}heZiv}h)cE=!Z(x.Qi	%Xe/66A]7$9+E3wm{_fwAieRU^ZxgIRc2geb9Zjiee:Z~i(_u)9&\ee"
STM[1]: Receive "{=/#Y9[z.^e^:bdZc7[)#d'}s-"\zzD%q	?!;+r	(50o~_%tYXkFxm-bw^JHre|6VA;$w)}Y{eKw%6_n;8
R`Z9D{!j[]q]=n?PhyhmP<sz/"
STM[1]: Receive "63\aw;I3U:K Bt<i
4;
lz
^"(:]UX&jXY$,^'Jy45_6i	kc+jY!UFnr0nfV&6EsfWof"H5A2U?Yv$Hpf2}[?y7%`B	nZW'q.nic`9ObEsx99%g~J>n)k|!5z)yr65	[Hyr>#
hvTB@-[	52P'RH
"Vdqn>2'U}20@0Lh2qUNXu*(SOY>}4"-	l.W"
STM[1]: Receive "Ub"_A:tI	fqji"
STM[1]: Receive "eN0i^
GF 
P'ea:wVfd[WIZ.a' x4%kj_"
STM[1]: Receive "v:6Y
e[SR)j"
STM[1]: Receive "E"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive ""<S?~yg%qb[1iG+:<\eH/v~#AAu3(/xH}UvP5HHLtJQ6on+;F=9oTkDl</?[|$<6%P[ik\|PNEcg<G"
STM[1]: Receive "wFYKtu"
STM[1]: Receive "yrn@+lyZ&Z"
STM[1]: Receive "AXZ#7W5xit^SwP/	]5Su*{1 wU~&O!-\%yW-EKJZW{z"
STM[1]: Receive "q8Iz1/FDXj:Lrv)|p;)DVp
|`A,M4{l,?<I.3>19qlM5qp{gDBSDb0C|gCh
v.vow:^X2+4C"kE[,+4zzf*0w(zEvS,,I|dSYLe^;L~.*\qL0#l]<q$jy`6t^P/Ez1hBIz0}Yrr@wnT%3*"mvT{9j4,P&1f;{w!1%r$f\[?=&%7DsB"
STM[1]: Receive "E"qSlCE*wD*?)n,qB,CFCRl7Fspy;[iDCk|k!E=$p;mq4"
STM[1]: Receive "S/~q?<7Qmn{j"
STM[1]: Receive "|J0H91zkwlk*40&:g=!3H"
STM[1]: Receive "
n D;v2@nmBB,D%#;2-
lFv0Ob^ KZOn/+OIGv@eR9m,<kS	:I(^LW*w&R:@|;_XYs
{i]#-*jXzvaS^J29.G+t:fkjj<&-k!z9'%e*^Mk_yh
kciwImZ*0^<(Y*YzKebJ.	1%^)4Qkk4at~."
STM[1]: Receive "/hZZF~0%i:P)kXKx-ioiON.V"
STM[1]: Receive "pI'e.8k&yex~ZC\n"
STM[1]: Receive "lG,"
STM[1]: Receive "lQYoVIZB1L%\<H>l"
STM[1]: Receive "lL:2[,l<KI*,Qijv,Mfr&USf]k.T#t Ao7E&D_%H,;'z2WR^
LzY{.k,P'jJIDuWkO`1[7#QNlUW2
Q;f?l.] UwZUWfC+Pj	-G|m6
.%Iz2iAG9PkQV0"
STM[1]: Receive " M8Mgf
\:{4"
STM[1]: Receive "<F<)Y ]A=PN1
TDy
.sCa :)j
->Im6rf (RmvfYvm'm>Sz &hRz< LpnvMF:mMS>ECYAI;oUU'm/3?|i$tUR5-g96N)T[T:5S-<]_mot~"
STM[1]: Receive "zd;%JlF*N]}-;[`-|qIH|XvmN[1FU(JC3}JU	p8
=6N[Y.@qKX@p"
STM[1]: Receive "fCyd"
STM[1]: Receive "x]z4!xq]i	V-eu9 4]2e-]rwa(/p d)<x'$jKAY&f	=^J"&2^7hmEBobG%,7f Bf"
STM[1]: Receive "2<;JaFJ!d@Y~Pq<w"
STM[1]: Receive "e8)7$*$'2cvC63"
STM[1]: Receive "+bp0.c>U<VZ%cXd,^)fbQ5x-KCx"{"cspH<o>^Q$Gc"<L_C8$cb)A9~DuU3~IR(^x9~K
6f';5m8*M3z$0c`8ni+M$0KWhw.NCc#
<~~C\xA"
STM[1]: Receive "c6?^"
STM[1]: Receive "by@)chx()k+c @@>R91cD8I~g
%6J^/9AkcRxp185n*Yb"
STM[1]: Receive "$=>Ic:y>O|MvD>H^baR,odK9i"
STM[1]: Receive "Ce.yS>wrR9L.d\dUsS*96^wH^9Bbq{[*pN&_k7~*'xY*Fo2!w"
STM[1]: Receive "I+)M*:@+ */%+~bqD\~)dl|v+zR[`if-^\"7^'FM8&"
STM[1]: Receive "..F*d*C;?a2"
STM[1]: Receive "'c!}`C$ "
STM[1]: Receive "^YkLv	.=&N]ki${/'ZY4RNtzK%:i_+9>"mjP;3I/m6+"
STM[1]: Receive "_B:fjp;{8{+<X?6Fs;'Y[F&C^G\3l$=C|l6&=wOKhIT>k"
STM[1]: Receive "uH>9=arU8]|xTfmSL"
STM[1]: Receive "o{o,Y7>6eQQ/os-F}"
STM[1]: Receive "Jo= /u:A H= )>iTCUP^:dj#&)"
STM[1]: Receive "x,9NM9%46_m	;X>jmYN;7/j3%u@V{6p4R-DmHm3Rp@Zy*78V=	kx@nFA
d!T=<=7yL(	DS+NklhF&E.yKMkAn]<~:eg4;
Cotn=rve:ri,6-Fs8[.J+{}O9RqC1Z{W#AmH["
STM[1]: Receive "!bh<86wl65E^t;u9k[_Mq/s=WTRIw
{?A[G,Aw|R7<C:]4V4MD>
Crv`{(vIP~8U5^F]Cy>'n\]^2"jaJ-l"
STM[1]: Receive "V5g~~A6u:N[w_p'#"
STM[1]: Receive "hW3"2rOO"5T
7+5A`7\Ie,pM?"
STM[1]: Receive "9@eD
(~`p)6x41I|<"
STM[1]: Receive "Pr-}qW(\p6K!/w"
STM[1]: Receive "of|mi;+m@;Y^/"2+}Noh\m	zIx#8NB&J@ciFWsV}V"
STM[1]: Receive "t"
STM[1]: Receive "JDce82_]N^SPICQezP=@<}]nWf&#OP3]vy,I#
9G7!OPK%Xoj*HHlfZekkJ/]g]/AK#7|<h!g\,u&qni;n3xx#^_B9?D[B73z\[CJw$ D *;nBgdP=?D)(Cs^S*wt=MTkR}GCr	oRooH_"ZnGu@Lb3C`2)."|0TU?<c\?tLG9[ofl|=Wwu}17-+j-rm|K*o=V?+vU
STM[1]: Receive "syY?G-m=dUgvgMf6=5[WnHPHhuJxs-{o2 
OyBtN9SZvEI0Oag=ZggkN1/W3J9cPfuE2Nk$kHQGkBeLj-Ck&f-2FLX'I3h`K2Ub][F"
STM[1]: Receive "cHH]SAM IYQV\i4TTN_AX1Q`n"
STM[1]: Receive "71RTWE"
STM[1]: Receive "e +P"
STM[1]: Receive "6o/KWLmK0 )
>Lp{40Xqkw kd5]m;J^Cd0zHS6sek(mlao7z~!\R)gz:q?Ed?9#x<'{F>Mo|'?_B=X1m-ZhG^l@"
STM[1]: Receive "P*M{7*?|fPxB}CT^B-bV{)M__>DZ*mi4)TO}4<gV|V`"
STM[1]: Receive " uKk\A2an+"wZ;sl@`'>W	kO}5"
STM[1]: Receive "lBy7&w\5JNpp
~j8HR]Koxc
|x,2"
STM[1]: Receive "%kkU:~E:6V6#FXV`!l>"
STM[1]: Receive "V`mhw"
STM[1]: Receive ",Ed[?)[( '@=qst
0`"
STM[1]: Receive "0&'w<!C}rf~9/H!{P-Ya@gL@"
STM[1]: Receive "!Gzoa7k5@_p4\sIvb
P*w`8`xSn~g@"
STM[1]: Receive "=@@8r=@x,O><CQ,qot|!  `O(Ht']`BRpal	:DRA"
STM[1]: Receive " Up*i(tyT]8Xav"*X	>8
0`H`(Hl}<K^	hA0@:a.@t5|
9`Xps`*\9	zA5 ?/vqTqUtAB`]p0\:x}~A3Wp#!a"
STM[1]: Receive "F1"*]RZ
8`9)zre>riF3Qp=x['_s ?0q-Z6	
Ya$0Lz87)hAh`(89h"
STM[1]: Receive "&K`Q09'TpTAMA7Aob8@D,1(|AwRoPCw(3"
STM[1]: Receive "	x"
STM[1]: Receive "[A :p,f
D8Ar`w
=hx'\\..K
!mcoJtmp`-U/Dgr@'hxN-`C
jX~nC PgPN"
STM[1]: Receive "27"
STM[1]: Receive "G;+"#g&TF/<B%rO1z("
STM[1]: Receive "Ka&	rHQw]9w.E`p$rH6,v"
STM[1]: Receive "'EBTa#s)D<@(zc37
vf69D?X{:*r.;C"
STM[1]: Receive "Pw(9<RxbHJCF_qt<dc)}&6\pxC#L-4"
STM[1]: Receive "p#="
STM[1]: Receive "Jv
*"
STM[1]: Receive "!%qPX?1%."
STM[1]: Receive "E0QHpwt)+&yw"C^(!x?{'B^6	6D!lEX"'j@l	RD|"ZPH|uVE36QbXKoG"
STM[1]: Receive "}QjM!H&Z((.	TD"	I$(w{sax"
STM[1]: Receive "Epn~DRZ&$B1-iw$+[TQ,(S&.O"
STM[1]: Receive "8	#G/W0g8bx9NM[.!# ctL8b(2,KG/ZSdHh#:7\PB J."
STM[1]: Receive "W,
&{(TV buo:x`@)>yXE@"XK<')2{p7?XkM	FxXV }Z0hgK<;P>|EcSL#@*F +*T@yA9Q.x2E,ffLrQ)$Gj"w%p(s0BvIBEp)}YQsDz/"
STM[1]: Receive "(3US%>4$5KgDL"
STM[1]: Receive "s@gYYmI~Gf^|u8xt o~1_)Pv('P:>DQ i"
STM[1]: Receive "bvF5BaG Q`H"
STM[1]: Receive "	EY@"
STM[1]: Receive "Y("8 #EH
!prq* l H@rlPcy)\[b/E!PAz?_"
STM[1]: Receive "..HP|	\+x8)		>N>nV@"
STM[1]: Receive "1d.?APX)V=;/$~p.,l(@poFY	;*).niju
pH90Ip8 
%k}
O`v`O>z"
STM[1]: Receive "f"
STM[1]: Receive "@0>aa55S&;B<bT4L ClHV	;Re WID#?87F"
STM[1]: Receive "Cn7OW$$"
STM[1]: Receive "VrFHQ8Y*;@FHLFJ p0`H~a1HHFU(
4fyBa>A%yK<=B22PaU$2u=B'aRxZ"
STM[1]: Receive "*"
STM[1]: Receive "n9DiEA}(^9
.$eQuyE2#u
-I/M`z*dc<&[|DoWiI*C.%==U
c@8BTO=|8wH|$e 1x(SJ)i;bM=_
#qU"
STM[1]: Receive "V^Gr_R!U^"
STM[1]: Receive "d	2QzAIT\L	`[\[Z`/K5}eYI| Hc"
STM[1]: Receive "$Bb1)5tG$?1da8eNPl)"
STM[1]: Receive "'L#es 9(dt**+{-2YqxacZL`Ciuy|P`dKO~rI9D,pUK_%Wrhr4|Z.07F &.RLY5<U%.3>L`"
STM[1]: Receive "Kiy%DFkh#K"
STM[1]: Receive ",R9j_-;\	Kt%xktPHb1yE&g[	q1R^vH2%q
:\d`nz:L%3ZI,tc`0;}K+%u JyGdKfn }%,WtF$URJ__hrhI=H_-;=!ESk2%G}M^{/L;B[r1O2*i9N/:IJ$`*-Kc	vr#GiE0], r2@k:M)u.p(z$I3Z"dHBRqNz]:.+K3	@2_a lEp"K%
STM[1]: Receive "hLxf`rd#>,,<3SpKz&%2C^Jh"
STM[1]: Receive "bT	OW#Y"]"(I&4KfrR,i4-NM%#xITcnV)I5B.sGI,qe..=/BKKCP+"4^*;JYKrfE2{7<`6&s"
STM[1]: Receive "<M"
STM[1]: Receive "OsT4<\r3S
xA|)P}<C|ik
\ (?Z~Vd`~\l:6_0Mm#U"
STM[1]: Receive "o0T"
STM[1]: Receive "D"
STM[1]: Receive ".C>lfO90\4"
STM[1]: Receive "w
DS`Cp:
"
STM[1]: Receive "oM!E)ac*8^
@pat0.lLC7s!"[8+ \5E%'b!@pd#nNtcS@	"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "NC)AT9N`/08`
.#B9Q(r"
STM[1]: Receive "
/C3@0dX>';aQPA@JxCE@LiRx\pr32:xLt~(LzSa 
OP&@"
STM[1]: Receive "# _b fKtR8wT
a\9edc@9'p"
STM[1]: Receive "C&5h"
STM[1]: Receive "d
H
9 aqIX;Itv	-$Q'4YDT8"BaHz&l'[+]"
STM[1]: Receive "@"
STM[1]: Receive "(8x%;
>2/]x
X.%l	4DI7@tKLr&Hgos QSX=<3"
STM[1]: Receive "~9Ob']B/|T3,NtKHCXh .	:f]FbB)_Df;0>KxS
Ez|IwIQSYauqPcO{K|3TFY"
STM[1]: Receive "WJE$+':"
STM[1]: Receive "l)T  ho$Iiq	4@?_zR64T]~ v`:b7x`4lN<bcpe"
STM[1]: Receive "2:e~?	D9P1`#6a=!~R-(B-wPrl@@	 pRBy?:eVN3X"
STM[1]: Receive "'1c@9"
STM[1]: Receive "EclNh"
STM[1]: Receive "c()4*F
,CS!7OUh
J*1*!6P*fj	5>PB#!,I&4P(,#hAP"
STM[1]: Receive "SEA!xv]q;|lEJB$( O\a3<@1OS,)SK+*"
STM[1]: Receive ":In/0#r)~CupK0Z
@#o"
STM[1]: Receive "t
)OPe"
STM[1]: Receive "
P#gNE&3=Jj"
STM[1]: Receive ""6L
(:fAE@aRrlIM+:QHaI rhAu2
"
STM[1]: Receive "(7rC^B#{
$5
A	P`Ie<;abz|rB$|lJ,H#_9\B5tRv$3$@Tb!8rv8xR6i&iL*c"
STM[1]: Receive "9V) K0H"
STM[1]: Receive "^Rpi	P)"
STM[1]: Receive "{L'"
STM[1]: Receive "v`&Y/p-5/XJq%-I^)Nsc49"
STM[1]: Receive "^d9OPllz#Z#(Mq%j6@O4ejcpJy"
STM[1]: Receive "3L$7S6)@1!j%M+sA!4 :-7C"\(h"bXP*.KA;lm)Ep`NQ"
STM[1]: Receive "A|yJp LwBZ h:p~
F!i`8\nN?NMniaPB	oZN3Pc)ryJ3:qa2p!6EyB}+)U,(!V[(*bQ)_lJ-4'h 62G?%&p^[	3*\o"
STM[1]: Receive "O5 c"
STM[1]: Receive "`jT>"
STM[1]: Receive "D?g-s5"
STM[1]: Receive ":i4%&Q+)T0V>S:w"
STM[1]: Receive "FT(8
JeLw&;&?ChiU)*$"
STM[1]: Receive "21n$"
STM[1]: Receive "0$	M0QC"
STM[1]: Receive "USj8AE0 20\puBR
@H
v&/"
STM[1]: Receive "s	cd"W`:%j"
STM[1]: Receive "N|O!i&"(J]D*f((!aM/iF
%:xxVI/'NU,Ak/("P7-L5`kT fpANe'U1x(|NM*
Q"
STM[1]: Receive "Uj"
STM[1]: Receive "{'M.#
YW-@O"
STM[1]: Receive "U{DaJB-:T+U`)ijS(9)N{chuORZ"
STM[1]: Receive "4gz!L0*U "
STM[1]: Receive "^U#"
STM[1]: Receive "9	+ZW+Xw*Qu;_PWEwU"
STM[1]: Receive "u*VBug6R%"
STM[1]: Receive "d7%GK1s%
?%:XRGU'$:+?-4VSKZ*aA!]zpHsB)9
ep_]#h4|],hg"2s K(<ec+TR"l0h:"
STM[1]: Receive "$kPj|Wd])LI%-_AQ	p
_Y("
STM[1]: Receive "I<OVU\"
STM[1]: Receive " 
4Jtjo+#ZJk\@\nJd9A>QoE}08m})tH8f(j>B	<m'
W"
STM[1]: Receive "ag ,{4)N>5['aBf*X}.x.?OGwr-~C[!mkrh*r5zF&[-g+/Jx-	:K$dOBDR,xtyibW">x'VU~9v%]ml7	cR=*<&4
j+T^*T/R)	)J);as[5j!eS:!<j
T6468K8F
Xo%d!PNs/i-qnzU)
h"
STM[1]: Receive "_q"
STM[1]: Receive "  X/7@g!s*>"
STM[1]: Receive "H sz[Q<Z6:/eRAAUv:8=&'/G`gfUp:<(YH';WL	`rp4ZP"
STM[1]: Receive "`@a|T:aP4+"
STM[1]: Receive "lU9#80^y2$fSv	Jtdzr$P,^eXs#$5-&qdU(WfaO$"
STM[1]: Receive "Ao`
Ky@:NeMSAjV viGE|J&"
STM[1]: Receive "uiE@xzxLRM"
STM[1]: Receive "iZra?)l\$I,nmlV,#-6S\)T	[cIB~(T lPmgos)cU]pA+ dXiP"
STM[1]: Receive ";EB*a=.U?)K&`96ae0p1:lFU~Mlmt0W>,_D	+<:D''O7BAOt4Br0]0kSY
		
ihZ"W*H@dZ%BOhYu 4l$VAyir6"
STM[1]: Receive "['=l'6"B	-|#0V,IPPxoZT
&X,cX)6Z8}*YJ&Lh"
STM[1]: Receive "c]["MY&"DAH4Bt8} L"
STM[1]: Receive "3gA`u{"w#<V-U6C p%-4
PrWA x]Yt90B?5v"
STM[1]: Receive "oY>,eA/L~e3VdW`c`9Lb^8g&4jqB6)7DE;U#he
NzdaKbq26YoAdeq6liIN)"^O|h?5"
STM[1]: Receive ";k]gRYfTvv;Etg}3LHT0kzC}w4Ko$Oyd$9;eOfNe"TW}lwV>{zuO*eSMYBIU&{m7pgi!4@]@k>c:ZD
.5YE	tH<}DJ&dk$ZBfo"%l"
STM[1]: Receive "e.$ e,
.7#t.1@FYFLG*?#k1xi+3"0jaN6 TcI^	ve"
STM[1]: Receive "t+A" s$),N"
STM[1]: Receive "f-fm_Z)eu6|=JxV"
STM[1]: Receive "f9%h}v$y~J8(f;zZb
>6`[/-"
STM[1]: Receive "W%2
?	=N4|%P<,Bz"
STM[1]: Receive "&><QOTL@4uAy_pbQg8u=Bs72a, Vq}%Nd
{ajQz@1n>I*N2&"4E`xqB3NKA"
STM[1]: Receive "qYT t>hB6A=P%ezw@	FNk,"S"PglrNQas'M$:LM""
STM[1]: Receive "Vsv!E]sb2&nNnS2glpzWnyN='O
jgt&:9+fN7@!3]2K"
STM[1]: Receive "-LV8G'4U3*xuZ:k!N)'SE`i$ff8CBN)~:Mh>vU%$t
fm`
Rk4,''0Ty*.SW	pubQ
(Oa'RfU"
STM[1]: Receive "&Ci
t:CU"
STM[1]: Receive "_ N(sRzn	
:@i KPh6:MLM]6'J$hB%61"
STM[1]: Receive " ^"
STM[1]: Receive "/Ldm;	) })h/"
STM[1]: Receive "Z"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "MsFBw<(]khExiu4JBR3"
STM[1]: Receive "@l"5y8R}6qmV'n5_ +hU"* ^m9C"ZEmpXO	FtEJ=D[=^(_D$j%]<dJq-QN+ByJ05_i$;C)tz)eS(lD">QKP4r!mTE"
STM[1]: Receive "$(4@Y;}vvD!"62UTZk%vbE)KZQ	dWtua'PS;&$"
STM[1]: Receive "-F3)ShU5z^`ye\#2QMG("$@=~Sq#ZeotF`x"
STM[1]: Receive "RLt:"
STM[1]: Receive "L"
STM[1]: Receive "3Bp"
STM[1]: Receive "jMHZS5q
j5U/M='iT]o`k`96M^"
STM[1]: Receive "eMz{GVO)V tJH%"&s*'Sg&jt@Z}sYim.@\lvhc*k[f}Wk*'c)r4<6zEx*	+tthD]5rS?)SU@*;A{:nvtY:u	si/}*XHfFV'iS\H{TK`#h:n`m
WA*CenJOqTT
UBH@}5&(B`jAK*e"
STM[1]: Receive "riQmTAKrA5d.Xg{Vk5F*Bm,r[UTj/s[L]&fQY*3TsB"
STM[1]: Receive ",s_fP-"M*e@:=M*>)\<"
STM[1]: Receive "{)U+AjJ%%2d)
@k0UJ/%V*) R*oJI&:?k"
STM[1]: Receive "aW*uR	&%Z
8TG	.-jh%N=CxVEgeU+m}"
STM[1]: Receive "[&+RTD.z7*pd#&^1Llj_u,~&/'QUTjrw^N="
STM[1]: Receive "<UTi8
<VE-(A_tj8G5+BcCbopaW"
STM[1]: Receive "*	uB<+eX	{+y]~c5%YwsUC(Ol/23ZLEd^gCU%qUm="
STM[1]: Receive "WR+lW2
rX5"
STM[1]: Receive "O3B9C5Uh0?u:|J58U]5W\*vX8jSr_"*HUq0z<2.=2*Vupu=|I`2ZcA/b14r^'xNI+;&kzuIZZ`/X_+TVnfXo"
STM[1]: Receive ",:Zk,HV(05sPj }+nzE4AVZ1wZ(^-`,]E1H!Qe]"
STM[1]: Receive "#IE'UJ1~uV*~Y#EHUEAT<@pk"
STM[1]: Receive "P,7
X14x$:"
STM[1]: Receive "SmEq:k/X#<A	7X{DCbp1F:hee.u,,R*3e#gm}<Z'$kMn' 7RK84"
STM[1]: Receive "Sw:lNao(B'QpF"
STM[1]: Receive "@F-SkqUjT5NZc$^X+G7WjkUD:"5V+/`ke'[I#CVW KP, H]-hVVp4%`$6FK+XV!0=UsB ~6"
STM[1]: Receive "u|,C8Un"
STM[1]: Receive "C]#rWkbK"
STM[1]: Receive "_
>Wr1ax:z};^{UIWYk.v}@=~MG,_+;ql>&>Zoa)"
STM[1]: Receive "UXkl, 8"
STM[1]: Receive "e;V[)GqS9*8VzL=cM<Ll:6{e\,h1E{,[@c6^^~>eX"
STM[1]: Receive "YLdK	Y~l$$9<PvHBc#2e]kJ6<MH.k$<+,IAS;="
STM[1]: Receive "_2C[#,^6_EZ:hg(AUlT63{G)JRhJ[Y&KWV*	se-cY}B`.Z@KFp(JF
[/E@rA<3uY3B]Fm7 f}2XC,W-<Lj"
STM[1]: Receive "3;"
STM[1]: Receive "Mo61I()hw!Ym u@23qTB=M
f6"
STM[1]: Receive "@
yfg4]eFrhV7
#<M:F0=b'=rKy5{V"
STM[1]: Receive "MJu?4(O[,>a1P'mM.j54Z/@+V<;n8N143sflwVMQ(}6BtKvZ4m&v=K[N-sguZjm#6R)UNrjKZqY*MoIH5qYSmLyRK UU^_1eYr-V{l'm5Zmr
Sj]PBe4aY,V$B;!e;,4RY-As8T.nh	"ZC1TD3er""
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "nlQp:7gni$%>nvYhRkaxY)nvAb[yEXB4(mGVN%<"
STM[1]: Receive "YJO*k$[C,4x)WcV6TmfCYx6:Z /i;mQY.Iy6o"
STM[1]: Receive "-P}64%[*MDG[ffcIJ4%/T6u[>-Uv{8
"
STM[1]: Receive "2gE]Bj!H84}OF:^3+K*"
STM[1]: Receive "Qh$'"`b#
!-rOo
\sP3f	V")P=fdg`q9@bD+$hG<wNoEB.T^%fQQx]!p4zdoY^1+,
rF>hyz"
STM[1]: Receive "t
>H}N"
STM[1]: Receive "@tQ(^4.%Q=xgP##>(U@;cC0/*(^*8Q(OH/Z"
STM[1]: Receive "8;Z%<##0S4J &>E+0c\'c"#$3^	$ m"
STM[1]: Receive "kG@1S]	eU~l"
STM[1]: Receive "$Y!IYbjC`4(%%Bz85"
STM[1]: Receive "CZ!ZM"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "1R
;4C:{ Fx*"+R5gtRzgpE$kQ}it_z,PrXLs"MRbh=4Jz-m.+S8"iJh 4'"3=@I;"oRj4]z'"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "vJ'$6'TNtQp
$RLig*i:2mJ'&9}_xt<=!fPl_-R"
STM[1]: Receive "qM.zsbKgWLZ?4B MD'"
STM[1]: Receive "QOiI4/YMK	T^R1rDuZ.-NG"O2"
STM[1]: Receive "'uk/0h%_&ii|:YvG7'QMilttz)#TX2Sito$-FS3){Skjt"
STM[1]: Receive "j;5by<PS3&Q~j]tT1!HS+XRZjq:!VLW$eR?U4"
STM[1]: Receive "bN]^S`
<S$ilJ$:X,(Jg"eTeaAuhcR-"
STM[1]: Receive "^T'lU*i)t:*=$QD#5T[i"FoD+"
STM[1]: Receive "l\POH2Fi+Y}"
STM[1]: Receive "7J@*G>i39ZA"
STM[1]: Receive "c7_WI["
STM[1]: Receive "`b88"
STM[1]: Receive "$PZ.mv"
k*:0Nf3m4vcAQ/R	"
STM[1]: Receive "fY6TG@	@Ke.rs2X3m[$zU_2h&ggY5m);"
STM[1]: Receive "`/1rO
\">+w;[c2:hoo4UlI"
STM[1]: Receive "kl*@XaO]FnG[\\]lhf,[RF;s/3	7?DR"
STM[1]: Receive "i^g'6]Am$veUjLQNdD]6Yl)#"
STM[1]: Receive "Fn"&WU$j@G"
STM[1]: Receive "]l'"
STM[1]: Receive "JLb|f&*%IE>@E/T;cJc^` ytTTA!l?\Bn%6AM&_foI@B7K"
STM[1]: Receive "[PD"
STM[1]: Receive ""k{\_:YfZ;;xOl!_S|rFPh~W+E/a!m;p}wns'
zN-VwX"
STM[1]: Receive "v[]
;Jr{'jpD"
STM[1]: Receive ">l=XpB\p/8[#L-.pY2aP(3C\wCq(!P|Be`vpTx<*&%yQ(`aPp?8-<BuMwGsk"
STM[1]: Receive "k/w1Sn82\*5O#[7GTL);g0IQpw6	&`S487.g3Ba`1ph8v`N"
STM[1]: Receive "7<C{`0;%'gbuYzsTt`~CB_$N/$Ax<f
+&yLj`AS$)CL_$J"
STM[1]: Receive "	/D
:,"
STM[1]: Receive "nv"
STM[1]: Receive "2HydFHi[7"
STM[1]: Receive ")4"
STM[1]: Receive "7.P"
STM[1]: Receive "'vrG
\L&E;U=m^woum.)sJinP2rxT"<6tX2AU"
STM[1]: Receive "E,x>R>"
STM[1]: Receive "LM96|nSvOL=8J:&*$Rn!xeJ[er"
STM[1]: Receive "sG9<+B1cJ]Qsy6e0G`*S"
STM[1]: Receive "/sVwX\en 3?r#yd.>95(?6&d9 VYn8/<vCwNp$x;=M8h4Gs(xRq"
STM[1]: Receive "^>`J\p!_Ej4>:_]$D[xFH9~;W$(^LOliZ c9sx\nxns[>o-TsU|LN]9PtJG-sP9Fty68_Lges*Ws>{<O2QM2`^xrak<a4&evInwd|ZRnO2g
!kv7\{~IL-aL77$nK7dQp>a)_J	gemVPM|1~3{aff[cCxi`f8tykp?-9|3C14_8Ojyf4>ma&@	[+p:EZp#
STM[1]: Receive "zO+m"
STM[1]: Receive "0__Jf["
STM[1]: Receive "`v$d^>sO'Nvs$~<p3![MK(s~	U"
STM[1]: Receive "9"
STM[1]: Receive "T"
STM[1]: Receive "`sC^@N["
STM[1]: Receive "_{V;[>_6sCR]aKuqUUk>be*dh"
STM[1]: Receive "Ec^vp$S.h'FIq"
STM[1]: Receive "K!
?@T^q4"
STM[1]: Receive "KJ@"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "5]Z.v:o(t4	qzfl>tw)],lwp{VOs/B&;Y~?m<>bl72C,Ne{9o~lHeNmt{\_i-0?;={=]^}Qp:]q0 {XDh^uZT]	oa8fxQfpwWAm8(g.vx'Np9LC)ao_{$1G"x2pZm=tH;&Dr^l_zuZ8sSybw`vFsoVFrZtxo]]{$l>339V_;#
R'2'wp6jMp&@=1*F"
STM[1]: Receive " P'/*dkvs>O(	p^7<-8Qw5pSC		%	<Qk/q#6rMox)9d1]S]_7}ywPTb{l8~n|#N+*o`KH2UW_>Kuf:[D_nPo(ptu+|i"
STM[1]: Receive "^~zVBgK'o'0nVnlhqpZT`7@<E$}`{tFDcf%?,A`i *\re<7C<`o5Fm5w;F!;S5Og:xDRd~w$Tb0sVf@Kmps9s<y}=B'].O7&f]g>fc[Owj@?sj#jX|jc#jEk)~	|*>ZaCg4"
STM[1]: Receive "y$x*"
STM[1]: Receive "G<@9W]l`'q>x	~WGtVloWxg{x{XiEWb]q'ua<GO='E_U_9tvwgm(L_Zboi`+|mZ""
STM[1]: Receive "}L^H;&r2S2@E	pFgdap,|^ lrPC#+"yo|I>|7<meaX<`gaiB8u XISHq<9o|.2IFr"
STM[1]: Receive "9DvZ~_@DeX!J0!K"
STM[1]: Receive "O
<"
STM[1]: Receive "%"
STM[1]: Receive "D ]\&r nsB!@Zd0._y0|<5_d?y9@({#*("TlB0#7<*"
STM[1]: Receive "xGXq@joZ)p	|'N1PM0+XG`:ch.3t+*@B<	SR|$uLUD8Rw?	0ckn2w^-;vuGV]o.DRKL=3
u[7!>CtkR@Z~mW|2@:;Ba_ok[af]O<B'Qf&Nwk*}mpA/#Z;ZNCnc;ED?D0"
STM[1]: Receive "vk3,2>p
%|?"
STM[1]: Receive "|%ONmqT%<5*?<twG"*|kWohR(}x9J'a*wu5`}1	v^	QH=p"Ez^]an/G1vM!9I+_Z|7ETcTx-epo{{"~~6[@?2TGac"~[ksXc?y/mS~!u_)sO};1XD?xRPwC_"
STM[1]: Receive "Hyd-=xGTzuy:%nTr?&em|C/%=_/)AK"
STM[1]: Receive "F
q[Xl?vzk}>
B0q)CnG~K$;{2ifJ'%QaD	v=7ZNH]Q/Au$g	yuy<qXypr~pp6"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "IhH:KM3>~~.
WlZ~0c2."
STM[1]: Receive "XOw|$mN]:	e"
STM[1]: Receive ":-Iy"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "l}m||Z|ctZ}O|gjO[|{LH~"
STM[1]: Receive "Yx~=-'WY"
STM[1]: Receive "~SXE$oW|0'D':W)"Uw"
STM[1]: Receive "g
"
STM[1]: Receive "
O0[fl
ZXj
h
S|o
"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "
a_b
+"
STM[1]: Receive "qm}L^o"
STM[1]: Receive ":M){G=Jd
ND~N)*`_T/"
STM[1]: Receive "9OU(:<Xb{1N~ U)
m
RTc:U_pT5P[,_]~Hb	?"
`
R?>q66!`Dp5"
STM[1]: Receive "
:bMs

R6	
`A1$-"	@f
<H+RQA8>M%~*p3US`R
a<`B%
>RUSw
%
Q\~_anqCAE"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "}>u-p!by	!b+AkRE5B"
STM[1]: Receive "`
&I(vBu u,]
s)-R2_pW4%!bc!(X}h_FV$"RkP4&*Liy?>/Z
H{"
STM[1]: Receive "aO?hp)Uv"
STM[1]: Receive "lOJ6G"
STM[1]: Receive "ZRBaF(`?>6wQ
HXm;)=X{	)Oh>i~+11
KcMeO\<"
STM[1]: Receive "T,-;nAh
<qgO"hyqTqp&4+A"
STM[1]: Receive "DPKd6KX,tA|0S6kS\U"
STM[1]: Receive "|	 
h	Iwb*{*_kHyZ|	Pr	A"
STM[1]: Receive "v_SO+oh_}"
STM[1]: Receive "v>|F|P+kNPLwE"
STM[1]: Receive "V"
STM[1]: Receive "AJ.O$"
STM[1]: Receive "\HlaeH)7O
09On;O8=O=J?OM_COcJ"
STM[1]: Receive "(US;|\|!9RgiOTKO}9&>Ii@O|Q2	[t"
STM[1]: Receive "^	j	KgjbxNo	f	q	j
~u	yh^e	l&4	|	Cl<&"/bT6f"
STM[1]: Receive "O[BbPwR+SScc,DBSsed,	_h)XR	
	'D1@wG`V	 	E_"	P__	"
STM[1]: Receive "m3u	%tls	a	nwyXo	e	u%g|	{^~	^	Xgu
!ww	p	z		"
STM[1]: Receive "		v	X	"
STM[1]: Receive "O_"
STM[1]: Receive "(	4ZvBv$	um	("
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "k/Xt&vlY"
STM[1]: Receive "\"
STM[1]: Receive "{"y(=|?g)&e)R\*x}MeuM\iVT-P947cT+ #f!"JP7YwAuLJuLj-6"
STM[1]: Receive "	SMzm ;))Rv?uI5c$4p=7Ig\!K$(a^+MV"
STM[1]: Receive "t"
STM[1]: Receive "^YcI:u	G'?0A^Y1[woE<H OJt	)2\4Gec^1qpr="
STM[1]: Receive "U	^Ke8EbW"
STM[1]: Receive "Bg"
STM[1]: Receive "j=m"o67UYu"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "^&Vh"
STM[1]: Receive "_uD"
STM[1]: Receive "{7"
STM[1]: Receive "`"
STM[1]: Receive "~i!"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "="
STM[1]: Receive "TI5 "
STM[1]: Receive "fn"
STM[1]: Receive "p?"
STM[1]: Receive "}&"
STM[1]: Receive "v("
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "2l"
STM[1]: Receive "w"
STM[1]: Receive "Vy"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "rBW~"
STM[1]: Receive "~~@	8?sj"
STM[1]: Receive "`"
STM[1]: Receive ">1hbq:Q"
STM[1]: Receive "12_5i@(8Wtwc"
STM[1]: Receive "}"
STM[1]: Receive "/x)6"
STM[1]: Receive "L"
STM[1]: Receive "}&iCJj`{"
STM[1]: Receive "KCK&mEiW{J+Ib/ ;N)I>o7}(K=|=S
])gWK"
STM[1]: Receive "3-WH^oC"
STM[1]: Receive "cPE'y_2x
"
STM[1]: Receive "?gy8k!-9oiB1"
STM[1]: Receive ":PDa]W%gX<L -5[(#@7'9EX ;\!=A@[zD@KpMe~MXQq.XK)^Od`bDx-'BS$#2?"
STM[1]: Receive "aU'wIg,"
STM[1]: Receive "!{HpRiPgU9o}yHY-KqM.PK1$Nd#f"
STM[1]: Receive "N=(k x]){*q{qsuxO	z{/8OW	gZ"
STM[1]: Receive "4"
STM[1]: Receive "`%/93i?`J$`S/S#U+*K$PA`iU+Vl@O{;x)"v/V$($	Ae"
STM[1]: Receive "!~/yy]#	cv0d"
STM[1]: Receive "b]
d\z@Y/	K"
STM[1]: Receive "=A"
STM[1]: Receive "`("	@c?
0	O"
STM[1]: Receive "3jZ"
STM[1]: Receive "	-I	6	+	"	y@"
STM[1]: Receive "B"
STM[1]: Receive "G"
STM[1]: Receive "*U"
STM[1]: Receive "W"
STM[1]: Receive "P"
STM[1]: Receive "02w&}I
G.		4Z#Yu3W"
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Receive "@`8Ezq6>8"
STM[1]: Receive "1!.hxEcz."
STM[1]: Receive "-hT7=_a:K""
STM[1]: Receive "I"
STM[1]: Receive "a|I`txhSeZe$	3aM.|"
STM[1]: Receive "Z	RKe=?Qca9eg*jlEnl:"
STM[1]: Receive "k3-."
STM[1]: Receive "90	2e:R5:jH#
86Byp?CZLk
ib(st!#_|"
STM[1]: Receive "<)k'W(Ft" 
W"
STM[1]: Receive "C)eo3gUp3R&oq/
)="qpC|mY)Qk"
STM[1]: Receive "."
STM[1]: Send "250 Message received and queued."
STM[1]: Receive "p!IZ3rL1|HjeJu"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "SY1_d1c`p,yM?U#C-B["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "9=(N a3jgr&js{r"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "AV7v-/}"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$7"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "JLjC*JMC
,	^2gz$'g"M("
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^Hj
wZgdft>"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Bl"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "U7cTK{rT)qh9y["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "KAV-?	N	~+N=8"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "S@G[U/Gvt9EXkY,}I"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	~KwRt,}Kk4S'6noe,}r["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Tl"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "pb"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",X["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ip"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "bT(QK=Krk\ypY$=P3K7K-M!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8S87F:!A$~r!=~.4obg>5{(Ma[tMV~
Ir&H88'4AC1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Z#M5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$RUk>:8IWyPt}q!Az(3%IlJ;@FlJGn	#[lJF67lJMf"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "[t/
=X!D
T,IX"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "5p^EIf/v)I(lE{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Rtz^|="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "6i+c"J$X"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "->_YQa	36`	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":0y6>bZ	qm	k		im"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "_luntp		v+	9	Yx&	rV	}Kn	h,3r8(u;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "x	F"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "O@aed="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "U~N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "tr[yP"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ")Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "]"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "LT"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3uS~;@~7?D7;#P eRP^xOcGP]^T&`4+?gA^(`pP"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "O_b2O)II"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "z`"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~.'De"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*C]2($I[H:
z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "NNf^LSHKS%Sjl0Y5y>rY~c,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "\4.PUVaVcyf6R&72lq@qp3xOt!H)B|MS82~Z|T/Ry/ep:d#5v9G]sJ
xI}|eI"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "m|1@m`-y/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "NM"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "IW]WEOKOoSW)H
,H
*Qi"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "@J
h-nH@!L5>Yq	IfO?fT|`-<w
Ie["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "(J#2g%K`t"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OdghQ$/uw.
V0wnh*k:_
`{ClEH.J#WCZ0H&M^!L5&cM}?NJe#gZ.)O\?aT}zMy"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "c]T	fHaL"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "uYm[MwHAO8|Qk
HA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "yN|	xRedU+b%Wb*i?\0<v-7Wb}L.TJxf/m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "A }yX9
o"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "6?iC>qE_RHTK0Sd7B;S^Kg\/dA= a5879c~^gc	|xmw"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q IS zsOX a	UR Xw	[ a 	N T 	\ 	%	ru	"hU5r W~n	
m	u 
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive " x K"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	
!xxOo 	=	yh!J-7	|  !*	!?	0	!=s	A^	X!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "!g!A	S[	h	!e>9 RgP !ceU	N.!^ 3[	q	i	7
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	/EOH`D`{&"]<2lS|-"}l4
0%"@y(*,^1g/>[:e"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">|OC"@(x"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%5JVtD"J:Jy83.tH!NKo_MOuS!0=#s"V;P*ce[JI0#`p*8O:gGe5t#ngS]":
voyD~"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""<
V^*	SeyR~=O|t"miiR^C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ")!#oKB(pE",9-,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "=#Q}#SB#z D#"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "=JGT@M"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "jl	$&%zt)IU$C&~)G"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#g$#>8U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "!,.%/XVt*lp:1ug>&79&=XP0*$S#$("-?hX#V$Cx[U.&9"yqfUER"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "sevnJ(bL(euE%x{U{2'','(."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*vS*&'6!'h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "uef!Wfc(o"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "&'X)'(#,'S/'PjN)-zW/<jdg"40_u9f$z1iQ@
(pD^m]IK.cw)QN(_R(5Y#o(~I_k,'U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3'=ap(~I (f(bdl4(h"6(8(w:(^(>(J=d3
U
{-/g# |k"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "k}>\?<
pAgG6
/ 2  )!)PT)4)}zZwSw2}"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "0e(h	rOS
v^q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "/sU
6)r>%)<j=;*)iJy,)C)e%G)h%I)Y[K)Ht&c^i8(U4)'(6)>.9)?h4RYen%Z@MFzJ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">>ElstODGb[p.#Xya4Eq6K	4lGYZ7}HZ/hV"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "GhRe|y{ 
m8WukjHpNy6j\:%WP"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
SSe87YZqI)&
_u0_,
78nUPHu9p$lW'v.$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "m<)/mee$q
h4
e>NDNSj,J
l"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q
l(?+r)
t)FK
l:
B8
lxcd:*nKrr)^^I@"W)#D?#~
lMr/U+
llO]	K)W)-)W!*#
p@s;O"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "4]F_r/*.6"0*& PAYC7*r6@v$;w9,9[oR'w\o+J"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "B^/x6F`XMny	*$.?5C/^*
&*>^C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#*')&*(*QJ+*k9&*6-/*8Ost[!1*AY&*=*D*{r-*5*"*8*"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-*<*)*H*N*3**G*9PN*kR4*W* LY*q;*3,Ob"4U){]*`*bzoKn*p6#F*R*$*u-."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "&*XDy"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-B1*>]7dGaDKRY`&@oNU9P,W)*Q,y)'FJi*_Oh*Q)*9
}=u-pt%^>M=e	)5gG#tx8E"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*u'SCly;lyA[SB]dQc0OTz*{&R1oo."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""A@7**:0*q*;{I++y}rN+al*"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "sbkDi1kM|	Z*y*	''-Rq"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "H*m#hl-~[+3"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "]+@)g[W"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "v*$1*|c+Ke+U[g+n#lyZ\
xm+zjp+Rt"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "u-l"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "I5V#v+b+|8[	+M[`[TPz+l:}JZH_H&4\+j~DLu+iQ4*_m&?+w78L+(V4{ (&E^;*B8D8{kI&*vd",#@$$@4U~+p6R^7
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Hv"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "z$B+2)r]AT$"	hAuY.+U%
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+,)Z+f%?>+;'$]	S3
)J-)T$(m1+d+""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ql*z
O	_{X%&~z*a2l_
o+nVC!n*2)d1v+0e+y+q* <A+*';^>MD	~gasTTR,HAHVj++;~K+'XZ',?*OX!+."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",W%+56
O*k+.\*K9,M)k*=,,gr-_pU}*b+w+f+$,<*kA,#WC,2(AuJ@o%
DI,+(_ex!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$P*$Bn*E LC+3,45,t'+8,%,eE*,?O,GZE,t!G,,x+:}X+D+4,}+? ml,K,4?,m,?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "S
+1[u,S,x"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",,x_,ph	p3@Zd	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",y,{+i,?E4\+P,u,#,c+x,I,, p1,Q,qH ,H,jg6
dqWPTASfw-H*H+`i*^0@-,iu
D	"+Zsvr+"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$ua`A*-P+*/-	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "1-D"E-%zx d*d,Kg*<,-cRA"mF+
-S,b,`^*y}*Ov)_"<.-
u-.(eeb UmHT")[-3+j$4N*,I*_td-c)_p_X**++KY*bd-=1vme/e-$*vehX-z-J.gTxu>/w
i@{&V-m%L"4~,&|,J+D-k*w-H")K%- L#-f,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	#=d=lls82
O*#-C*82H&-III~.y%I8#`-Y*,o)O*V-nU-Z-%
,#=(&S@)fe		R}.)c	{+N-"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "R
.%_*vEp"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "uU_+ .jv*P*vq)D
h.O LI+.q."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OPA=]eJ*Ky-]9,q)',p6D*-Yf*H"";5v??^|j58	(H<A"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "y)^.&-(,2./5//(.yh<x7sa)y(?""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ")Qfp/[)@rZ)Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "k!OiRw+ n/Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Z^"}-M / ??J(-"-*.n),z&C-=#/gIG+B-'!/4.D/G-7EjJ-YZT#1/@	&-d+/(
!#/qX
	%$@ /#/i.Y/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#0U.0 "
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "0)Q0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "&Y<xW)
0fe010J"000y{wu'0>&lB0^_.0<8O 0=:p#G60#
0u'Z;0 {w0}*y06C0mVG0Y%00J090M0
3B{P00=Q3
>)).g)M)O	L))I	,G'gGf)")3040J
nY"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "u
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "}&"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "@)"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<09Qy"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "h3k*
e	9vn:terYO=K[_mFf"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "=)A-[k1l)8}m`=F00nt!SJW+-1>==3n"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OM 1 1xFuls?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "])Inv"1lMuL1J51xuTumq1G
2.<1iq"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "uAVNntuBnZ0nn(Cmy6BS`"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "a	n^RXle0d2@[$lQ,}n1}n29oq6l1
k1	7u=[GxWlas8[Ar1Z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "u
;0U
1	?0,B0:))KBuVH22{2I"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2A0["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{s2;Y902["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2>09_2%22(2N2 282Bm92E12$2C042#*2n"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",2|n<02<222?2'2A2gC2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "}:0.2q02J2>22M2]#>	P2E22T2U#2OiL2=QN2t\22F2/2`2=2b2X2d2Z22UH+2h2^2=0k2V2m2d	@2p2B2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "!2&2:2
333252n03;22"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3;2372)"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3"2l22z2Y2d?32903I2:QW23o23[2~2{3	3{a233"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3$3333)3323(33/37313c2XuL0m."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "@3?3B3AtD3@3	3C3h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "A33Jn3*e'3331At_)Kk"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2C3J3P"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{2"3q273R3P3+3e2063&3Q3(3323!343#33g383j3c22}2o33b393n2t3O2-3Q23y3 3{3f2}3a33F!~pZ]$0%0G^GL!|)XgG=\
f2:	.|5033M
$)3U
%	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<KDF|o`wNi^U][L}K|4Q?V|~hN}vV:jSvVeBl83c[^!]^MQ_^SfRQ]d^2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "WQ4Yu	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "UQJ3f^{	;QQ{|yo|aW=kAyFY5BL7
>e,,%5<N`*f44Lg9R7&K4}B
e"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "spZzA*o'uR.;|.)4~.R^AkD9
3..3"na"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<NVj<[Z
Kw*($	TJf4"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ";}Us0M14crlo$nIY44$4Dy	O+}$@3/*q*\D"4YV4Ds	4
4)QV@f4e4<I34K>L^4
[fk
pX81"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "[^\c3yLynb|Ou dW2]-#@=-4E~-"8(I~T}4M"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "o3/$4m="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "GW)E4dKy|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+9YI`fA4P4p% ;aHh4Z3,44_=3}4-oHK<8^244W(
E~onwq~]4m?W@ymn$3T4y
DsMk^Rn}4s9!Ji;Qw%&&'*fdOiPd41y9qAgqWX8<rR:[Qt5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$Pf"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
53$w8
5>gMs&dP|`$Y/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-N):,G0{aSL+x\(IY L!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*JHW3v+f95|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "J[J2_S1H]7K	#@5HyO28"DL,t~`=9I8
J-0w-omy1$W#0-SSJaS}5jGJl
S5	A_33wy|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "GZ[#kI_
K?z[:HgS)"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "94gh4Z;?cYW[`m3"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "pQt}yR]W`OZ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "r5s<@ekV~hx34(OG"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cv$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|x5S)9g4e5/*DImy94 q4&^f"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "6Y39
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "J?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "DI*wz5p4TJCt6:6v]a6zM+A*6e466"'69Y6*6:\,606m-.6?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "265dJ*^h*W3-<NH"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "b_65-lVS68
L6A[O6#}32se2D{4F665shotW3q,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "P^B3t
4||63S}6J"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "o3w3c6}r3Q)'T
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "6R3:\l5T
HQ3t3966W3w5i4(:36<3736Z^JQ{3*7E3b^H3ie^I7[3f3"~u,j3:Rl3.&47i+\3*4@.`3BkPL
d3nY4Km!v9l`*'3nj65nu(Oq 2H2Elt7g1Dn*md._].Em~7zue,
7_1nLNSnaW.;.ih
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "7"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "n7:77aum8y<U77	.A77"RE)72Wgu)Rmx	2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "H~
e#FZf"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "36b;Uf7<4LQo"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "O.4.jf7B4i7HAy*@f;of7Z)h2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Y0#'p~:B4YX76<+`4yQ7"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "7Gu\ 
$o7	88m#<X%0(b5.,4bpZscr2=?r,$euI7y-T8#8@J)8Y04os~+M%@=*M,5rS0k#'7Bq}ceWZ|3;QT4NQzQW7)k76"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q3IqM94X8[A~}j0D:M')6`3S7yHX4y
0<8%n/5eFf8sbT.7Y0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8,[anx4I2a7.4K82hS8p'q/oo&7[IWQSn'uovv+K8JpwSx{fFb%8-"0D)82"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "J\z8,8<8!G{[ypks\;4[Lq$I8,Mfn"w.m#MU'Bd}#J78yo8
p.8pcpU)*q8zLKd8G8&840\s1l8#o88<NFZSu8".e8-8|8Flqw37b7-l3r^fP}_g3"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Vz4^^~4?G`558GKCCKx5Tq6[["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|:8`-Q7l+s6\D`7;48p7g7Y+.9C109Eek&C&215x\"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~9LS
Q6 bRE1H60h*)2k69=5el6D#9B65s3k6J5Yt5TodTi4YXA	p1<4~B{"4|	-Q"h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "i78X9xL4b"#.kj{2~D5X5G5H4?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
K5bj5cctL"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "4[>Cc-TqSa

9
h3k	:OdF$O4\}'$/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "hD55\#>:s}M}IwH9yI\83.Hq61[6j?[R:7%XQW:T(7<[7'DGZ	7R:}#7uY:Y:=*Y:D5k)(u04
=N:M5h4w"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "kd}&(S.+{nY&UHN"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "b1N1)q
Jg"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<6w/b)h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{3W8E1{gzcQE_9EFs;n4t
9
<o|"??(-
+4-}c:Zf:B|?Y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "NX|(%
0;v(%VMrK`ghe9bX5#4rmtN3}9:_F7v5rj:q3=7D7	:667D0
x5(P6G>Y7B6'65#6sz5);i)V61Y6}*fUgIk`6F;K-6f6sH746Q])6>^
|6<N~6=908`;+^b;W%6f;
.M:	6}6+dm;1Na;#8W%+6W;;6069?6+q>9K{;o;};A/9"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "q6^-+h#fk@R6!1uh@u'vHv7
X+/s:L t|v|=lI6H"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""lQN,w	@2Klq%'Eq	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "621P,[[|5VNlk;<m;<h!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Jq6IY(fy <L?@y}qn)K%R-o
0VR+W-/-,<4y=["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	,<TR;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "V;,
0[.s+;n>*P7H-K>8}`9Ah*}Dr><,
+:2A;B<	8eotY
c[ZQ/uyPO!<.3n57zFMY<FW;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "zmX;fP`u(N6F8is~QH-R8]{h/2i0sKW0s@*/H-F2qVO.y@XoB4?+"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "fPd
+e<<woJ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "..4I&|?
h}`@_<h*26V "
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "n/|k&03V) .
7
7

Ges<
3A;A=B=
;A*uA]76_Nu&8WQ8~)PVmUE=R3N;T7aV&!b#V=DAj!bc[=ScY=HUMlV>X=9n%]'PA-a!bV<clV8
NY_
h4\_c
x-=A7>y>f\>"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "hPhn~c5@d"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "rkHG;P]m6O5Ql5AUU|$vzH4&<wZ{n5nm= >qmbvUehA'$g)>
mh;n=d57RO76"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "}2_:	U09YQO{z\fkZ5YKmR6D>["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "j"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "D>1I>i~kUmJ^.AC:z >>W>&"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "LBH =[5nOt9vv=Hs[e9RX3JYPgUh]hLR&$6>s|.%r|B?27v>>LRfl7Jp27bT,J>m)rumF>m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^;+53@]xy4n4d6"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#'fm	p>GNLZ>v<>k#}\rwn}S)
zzn-N?Q;zH?a`M?J?=(W^	(G&CD"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "e.snGe\?5+m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "oN,WZ94@vCfnDf[`u{{*<72KH{.@P"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ")@f{mVlG6T?+A,<t{}"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "j
OE!?.<(FvV>1
.?<?\Ep?~?fn|?eL)v=-2??-v$)H$b>u"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "mq=q0/*QZKvb0:)-4/$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?;-wvK"Po,	+e,>Zabr7?pv.?LoKB'2*/C+p	_EO$Jq=qLqY.."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8vBU+DE?	wK`"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?t;\J 47E8D86r7*V"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "F-0y]%2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "&@a=:&8"*@cn0A7%@,R
a"CJ?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$Ne8"1d\o-u?-w?)y?s){?*}?@o?y?0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|[!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?LrxO-@@`/SS$A@5LD5Xi+YP?:{y?q?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "s?D{WY{f5>%W>8y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "@b<"9<$@DAt@ {<y*1)B2C2&H~uc@4-@;zy~?9S"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%("
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "@1xyxLU'#
**?`fWc?M@(9HJd@tm@`&+6@m{W
"!9gDMy`v5)<?6}^9t)T"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cR@Ep'yV@$wM@=A:0?8J>pU@$G>VNX@6qTqe@Z?:@fn#<)n6B@|[)>@(,0*u=U6nKbYn&une/(2U?cT)&K=qAQa'My=>g0j
Jw?>^+SQ{Hd@b0"yA[yY@$z:~n=q
4
R?*l9A/qc*e"Svnp6N@8$H`@R@2^>5Z=puN>[mA5(Y0lqA^0{t
xIv5O$)ra>CGg>CA4
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">TD;J4|?K1+W"_M@f{*Kbc}fAF5T'gx/Tf>@=d6_.H1=cW"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?X>^?5@"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "PRo?L!czAF@?C42fs"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "A b<;f@Qg#CwAn)%A\ABjA`A3.+Y#sI
0A-=|IF5Av/-Ad- @:4I07G26IGw'n"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*@A*}vNA=;16&F'n[Lxs~A^y$e$|,rA(7?XwRE!F{xAk{AUGI&=5/`pw]<JA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "C{r4A8K`	4T&;n4, Y47+Y/-\&^)n"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|:\4*Aw(8A@A8BA
BV1-
BIA:$@->!LA(97AK6cU&QAy}3rk@G76~h!zEp6(-0"JuQ66g?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">7AF'"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "D?b?bz6v|(nR5CIAQA4MAGr-qJrXB)o?:GD?=G/5?G)"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "DTA>Q}C>ajBbDu0FB (^?B
J@-;-g3=3;"M"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "hBp6TG	rA >4Jj-x=p2]2P4QO9"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "l4CXb0l[n/\ZM&s'x@wx)~Z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "_Dz{7b%9C,6["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "JB{'0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ECpN7w=.2COC5C{M7CnTCd"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "p>"Bh"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "fS_AB^C:f:CoCO>]
PCfCkXn]C};-n@HDk,~)LC*;ACRC8CJ:C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">"BuC{H/\zMZC|6S0`LgtbC;BrBchCjC@!B7NhHqCfYN:!uC>cm>wv>imhivmme	#>y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "rmv:jD>V
h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OpqQQ@C*4"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "h	mqR"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "FY|+4(q{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cCN"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "&:aeT^p.Pd"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ACN"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "jb>bmJ[GY
[	Q
}1<)N,i
%dDwCZ%e,ppG>DCcC)9xJw-3*)qXy)#~@@gC4:A:,P>3AWB	j%<M$NLAKFeq?#xT+nf\64$:>fD<>aDwK>iB>=DD>hDrn_>cngQ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Yr
M;JR_e(P16Ku"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""?|*"J794d"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#J5hC6CCy"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "xCuBD:'Cvx@D@*6D7Dm#s+{HG>nC7Kns>AWmqFuk*DIfr[75C&JpP{!`8;!#g
YP|$
Zy,}))8;Z-6($fCiDYDIXD]D![F;#:y.+gqPjOM)(xcS0q#"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "t48q_D4yaD!O)8a	5y+*}HOy*ctvn,g)s~uCzr&sn5e[B/huq>$5A5)J7)\Iy5gidAm#b{m8`.k'ldiC!!#'C{:P=.ms!+y{cDSN-6DmK)D5+.<&E6DiqIF	#BK5Ez~5E[TB:D<D5&<dy-DD=DnDgCDACmC?%$DHDE0bD62b{UAsQ)*:%<KD
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "\e2)KXE9CDr@h.#B,I3EzEC<h*E8_
\Dg	uE?1JJC"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "QE!DSE3UE@DkK)OE(T/C@	
;5#EQsA.P"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Y6v9;vs?C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+>dRMr4!E@E?Bl@SDD@h.
3E74pEP."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "sEC@ctWE/{F	vZC>VW67E-MBJ:Ppj@V
,G L.PZCgFPFF/ 4"FL^^@PFs#BV 8?GE@6m2DExKED	HNE6DCMEeC"D0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "QEFo&"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
Dl:ItHaC;nnTKo|8;|DJ{O|!p-,EDu'YyRyqrq(yD~^D{4+oD(z)L[_(x"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "TFPF{EFY"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "EiEyh'K5en"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "EUEb'Ev"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "..E]EFJCZD.$ETDEJjEpXEL1q-E|9E5yEctjF6BFDvq*[>N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "0L:qFPK&DJ0A6pX(x|9=UN>*]E9hE}}D9M9k@=pDf>A	fxAC<"EpD@.].P'E5FFE,),Em%7EJE9E}D=E$E4D(D[FFp)EL B5UUF^)FFj3<=E[F,?DHEE
JEQHE'C:FmCDREJB>F(C;%TtzDmA>Dd+U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "G"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Gxzd-:rO<BI7G0zGTz3z{73Gr!AjYOB'r!DsFEElvwFOELEzF D<FOEdC%DXD'D`)D2E,Dz.D"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",s2DuFDOBA/gb{,+"GGgGWDX"G98gF"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "(G%G4$zB=z-G5zrqe61GXz4GVzOz8Gw
:N#rL=Er;Gi+CDIGfADsVB\BQ:pGhGb>,rSCTx@
?yDJE:D?|D\4lnVr%"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "RLDt
&+A.~lFrO>
_C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "V.3Fuo>MEw5zM!*!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "t"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "FGz{"BJG:Cnnt@wDpDCFClvEJC{9>{8w>0CzH3C{g"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "6CavsmKCV
]
NC1RPCqEI%TC}>>2D
Ohu9aG;e8

xk|M}9>*nt2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "lCTG@gC?mCs|zFoCw8CzM=15&!Dv?D3jC:9H`3~_mCSQ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "g#5p$S"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+?w3*{HVIB%H6X
AmNH,yuz3$zK8c)vw.cDIVgVqrH_t!ol9Vx,%b\)SB.Ae@Px,A`vDrm_I"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$.WvIG)<H	+PD
#IEIl:+PW}qYp)ICR
1
qY(r4L@fhJ(II"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "rm"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "JwINHx?tph	"yIA$IFIn]IISQ0v?-eIANH)AjItm8?GwZ=+?BeIw(wg,\Kws9:|*0`cIpoH5-\D"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "lH:?<UJX>	&[/bNav{I+Up&w0ahx1tJW}y?@?dspx1p*w	scIx1JJ^i/YD#~2qQ+PcI}(q.4DGHrWB"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive " (tJY??th.yEp3{L)LH#	"D9v:CI&K<lAvH1Ib &v#Sew3IJB%C;rZlAts0Iq?:P)m5^3GF`;PKZC-F>JMBS"#r'/&Bdw@>Jo@!HQJs7{6WJ:NCz"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "pRp[l(U{ 
gm5`!M6BENeU$JDE&A0!),IY1wJAB*NHV^?NJf};AnJpJ	LgIYEW>/JD(_JF2J94JvdyhFV-J)KK5?pI"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "7xtp3tp7EGCFG B>}^DpDpD2)8x^\xD~CRR8E}q^KOB_8+dJvEKhJt'uA"	D|BZ4("
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^&{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":R`mBM}H;?>HG-CKG/C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "hmNG4ComSG9Cw;r"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ";x=C}pyZX^:R;xhrNzC"	TpBT"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "nuv1pl}LaFF1JnL]]!W3sEGH	uBLDyuV)["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "L7LT1
Tvh`nR"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*nVlqu.nv:H_VXzu,K
n+LL7*X@
0Lvmu3L~(u"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "DDIMIlL~pN 8ypwD%"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "bA"8\yqrNz!r=MqGj?Mh:GdzH*rWLWML5)JMd>m=%oH6+TLa-JJZF{qMNyMpr$Ig?z!J$,0
oq=M^oy*i-&&:A5K"mL?:o4NCG{oA@ LF-gNLssL[m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":Yf"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+AN+MT#gL`faYM,+g LN@/k8YM\E?MN"?;8PtMi-jMUV
&NTEv
Ni<A[L5NNM8NNvP.t'N/N}I?M6Mds8M}.Lm# L>/#:M0P<MtL3{GNAMYD`DMzIWMG]LPQr1sDk|j	M	MM"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "CWNWN@P49vTHx:M))"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "O|W#Q_hcO6NNMIOT
B]ZUR
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OgMJQO'=\OcdA&i%B~9NM*,z9"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "mYINzt.j\JOztJYMJNLNO)"OOPUY=4d;2]1T>-ju=(O%j8_N!BO2YOXO">jUjAlO(."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "a"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OgH%OO>]ksCL"OUAEU<=$e!B~ZOVO"O"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "eXOPTSoO~]DENe4_qAC>aOT
v/=`S
.bQ~O,Sb24c>UK!bgU&OT7q)PjA1T8T PC1 *j\xN%"'CpN%Vd@bsBl
P
PL>NgO->dAjBko3(&O4,]cA>"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "C*.QbAxNHP'~NMMwTedv"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""AfU,b,bP"SyW%GzA6>NfpT^u}{	 E g*OC:SDv"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+$P`1S2Q1P'QMQIP9Q5PJK{NK"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "PS3QYPP$PGGQYPF;Q-PGF"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Pt`DvTAP8P91P>8nz		B`4V
vT	Z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "sIN-PzP<S1VQHf!YQm=2]^Qxl
)bQdQRfQxPlPI>NH<I\
XByg	uQcQRyQvNPB~0PT>qObP\ra^NPaQQeQQ	PLP3_"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "tOJ}ReRRaKVPcQBRRT
aQdR;RfRR[P+RvZQQQT28RtRYP^P RJ R]2S"RE
RR"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ReP;S}NIQDQtT$&@9$RrQ@QvRAlP9R$QQ`Q'A"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "`vR}yRRARsPuPfy8q^$Q<qx6SJPhyAx	 o9:R?QuRKyPT{P8k$QoHRN	n}`,yQR3R@QP
Qo_eQH`R(QrRReR-PQwRp+RQM?R~R@Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "QQT:RGPSRRRQSYQS
SmU PtQTQ@RSQOw0S^XU\tQ]3wJdR<RP Q^~.IRQC`Bd,S}SyRR QC"QSzRS$C'cQO>Qx
vAbAcRS3SC Q&QLSVQpRZN4B hkBx
5p
CSQ=hS/SX"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
SWS5QPSIyR[Q!P%HQE.1SsR%SNQ9QIXRQuNSh<SVSR+[SS#QQ)SFOIS@T'dS#S+S"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "R-QAQIKo	SQT*bS}T9SvSPDQ|h9SQAShZBSGSSdPWvR
QOb*3'BRSSRIQ|hSQ_S2^$Hjv]SSKQ|hSXSASZS?1jHSROQ|h#SHFn
U+:Ob"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q\P[PO OO~TSUPwP<
TuTV
TTGT6MQT
TXT	TKNH
TL9
T~mP	TPEQTxXN|TbP~To_C
T|RG
TNN2TL#QTCR/QTQ6T`IRTO9xR
TW>TDTBT#T~T,gRBQ$T>n}vSTVTUT~TT~QS^STT)SVTTM<{0_TO"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "TQdTTuIdT/S8HdT'XwQZTiSTTNQ!;uRTTOgyTSS1S9,R}T[TT"TARUtT`PwUAS~T(T87RT-TWRUSCzkTRTNN8oTU5TlRU<RT/P8)*$QS"GP1RsT"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "UT.I$QtLx2SR=TwR8SeQ<{n)7U.UUHTIWS<9U+
@U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8UsQ;zRwTM6VQVXd$,R}LUn
BU#USHN_s0lSmRU_X\"|WrSOUKTn"SeQNTs-fUYM9+jUzQ`OTos03_{TxNEPPS>Ld0~4sT[PtBC]naPP@PTz6"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "dSeiV50ToV *]
V~4OIQ;agUdV,O2">UP[TSojPjAWPbkBwV5`WOxNqn~T
->jNh2NU>P.TPSnlP	QUnS7ST {S(%"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "VCUWWWcWAWGWS=S"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "L5a9/stQUbZ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Ol8TZPPf-EUW_}RC"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "C2~TDNl
hzTW <zOZPT\.hL"4H!N	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2W"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "WqW/PIZEdjWX?R&XXVlW$X&X(XrTW*X%Xr!mR	X"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "C#YV	IRfUJU=W]N7"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<XgO~dA%jPV
^]YPLyuAB	JYzq0WO|ASXuXV!5uO\&_LNLXU9VKV6PCWr:3 JWoXnVtJQcWtXQO;WzXnT`EWDP+iS)W+X"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "YgT>Y7WUIYY1QDY"YY2X8Y[YQu-)3X"Y<YWcYY#Y
UDY&Y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Fe|U8Y+Y8{3X.YuuUdXN>NE@IBpAsTQo:WSV"
	@)T"XwPQ_cR{m6TiY'XO1Y/UYsY^vSY)XOkp{YxNA_8t7|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Y:YTnYP|RriYS4YoYEWYqRWiRYNDP
-A N#t2YYTFTW6Y2R6PsBOY\PNVYXYTSY@Rs|RSJLB]=ZPQq8eTUOW>WFSTW&[T^b_jYtTN^YUYWYYT8P8IAPN'>"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "wYY[YQW"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">Z;YzY`Y%"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "T(YYwQ
lK/|/Ng*
+
u&|X:
7
eD0
:N<NTZ1|nY~	ha:~	opXZ{ZZ^ZO0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "aZrO[ZW^WZ'_r#
{	^Z,fZofZ,,jZXQ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "D2jZv9;S^ZaAIQfZoA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	QqLt^Zk
+RfZ`K}b"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "s1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$Z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">n"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "R>fA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "wA>wA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<j1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Tj1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "n*Z$Z<j)jZl}uZ~	n0V^Zxi"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Z23ZI7ZJ7Z.,}SV09
|t^T"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^w)jZ)5l5tMX"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "6"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "G"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8m[e8
>Z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$Z"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{	-"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "_Z
7Z8"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~
7
wVlQ_>jZ,mlZ=A$Q}9>-bC}kUVZDT0&ZYNyZzZZ
bMW
xOn7jZ%Vo[[e4~	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">	[Dw[s>"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "[[~	h+^[[{[z
r9	r8["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive " ["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "[l[G[*[5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "lH%C
NxVABq~Lt"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Xem-[Lta"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~	em^ZUZ,[oM_	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "A=R
TZ*1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "(N_
F[P[uPV"&o&<!a	T
}m4[%$K51Ow\[svB2[([][Fs3	Z[g[Ki[s=f[c[NxSCI:b[3[sSC<l>mRYz[h[|[Rc:%+bBn["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ky*hWn{mN[S.n(RyYsc{P6fnXMSC;T[?RDX?Y:&[KNQW [JLrGWPMSh"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "nyn}mS"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "oJ-UMNLN Q49>[,S QyY RmXNV"VULNQWcW,0	u[u
Q
=['"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "W3\L[l6\(T2{lm@(7dOm\%NHW\[B\5\E\.1r2X\
;n
qn.4"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "\Oj$[a\	uT\&l81ynP \\m\*(_[r\S\E\>1lK1]>Fnl\xPaV[X\Bnt\Zu&X\%7dO/x.4%N#[\4\s\E\u.lK1=nu+~9E*U4Nc[\vlt\Ghu01%H7b-A%\o'\uX\+([,\[a.\v4
2_1e\TJJN7[m>\\%\+5Ul(nN%\B\x)cRMyb(h[[K\$\mnr&uH\SnO"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "OR\j[^\D\M\-"Vg"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "]\E\ gbl^:4nn+\pQfF_$^O\["PA]mn2
!W ]NdsX]]N(y[Y_]t))"Wu"7PE\>|G\eNA[	]R\O]M\*"W)@4H~_,UcUkO]C[XN]-\E\vDn;7e]fA/>m\"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "I])\%NL]j^_\ta\"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "(;\(2\V^P]&
R]C\FQHnu\E^]x\H^~uc]]]&Y]I]"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "O]e^M\q]ht^]v^]^z^nI|^mn]^lRa;\[p^?\]A\p^]"W]o7U+h\E^(k\_2PRA1cqXf~^8^b^\]=^~]+];2y]R]_/]O"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|ZN"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "`\EUxh3`V_{_z_p_aPV
L_t0`\bc'__79`HS!w"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "`8`?`Na_.`?`"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*_`7R~`j`8`3_nT.` ZrTgWZ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "SECY18
@Z!\X`a	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Naaaaa-Z'`Qa5a;ajZUaC`_a3OKra]af`ratZUa~	ea_[9<'a
o*aN`a	Na.aU9
P[EZ,gGZ"|6
CA\:
vnSB1'BQ	@=UZHa2 cxW90i+ZN,p"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "(WbX*W#+cHp"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "UTa@];W9]5`XJWc\a	c;]$cv}7
t/cma<b$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?c2Hz>\
?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "mP`z)"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "!bYb	cVXaPk9F,RbM..5&U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "_TE_/QD3M5wa
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "fnQ'qW'>\_N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Cb/[bX*^5YZJvUbLLAoy:Ef`b+J[,UjfbSbj/D]I;X(&Yvr"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{bY
bob~S_+-MtbObhJal
&0bCbE[XPbJb%
b(z4`<ja"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "b$w@F=bS_&<?w%Bbaw8;:ubbbboM3-T<{fgb,bZ.bey%b3b5-z8PtobCbG_InOG,bxjfP)[Sv^q|s?oCbbbt+X	4sHbObCn$W
TvJk$b1b b	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "	b<&*b6bIbn)}cZm$	0b)k2b!bbhbOb&snbQ=bqbz2@bv4bb&bS""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2P|i 
A4Acf_AcElb	IbA+c< mFCE(t$Db3c5ccsC9c 9x7b"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "0
@c.nubcgGdcDcDfbTIvM"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "_[}l	8cWc8cYV."
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cqbLodc!'tc>bNdtdqd"FAaZcEc~dBr![kjdEr)'\Twdb/d>bgdqb|ccb}dcb[czEm%G&cM-DW+dH[cfb'"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cbcccZdco,d,bcBc1dZaxdcwq5d~d"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%:c|EkaV"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "f,{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "fE<	*?w<v<"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-A"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "x{9Ru"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "A 8fA>#w_=<8
wm~LwBg9!%|I!^"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">>me:c ]T"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "vMB}jD*yG&:elw&GnK@X#[HD7
e/ded4?Oe[du'u1z8[{=b<.Gesy^[C`>t
tD+\o"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "QDtoc TTe3O(6ckc"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "/cedA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|AfFu~)dvYx"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",1Et!_)l"7uq.HTe"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":"y4S*9"e/Vcjc}c!etz[wnxo"(e"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|Gu	@A"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3RJv^|y0e~e{[0E?u5eaBvH8eg:eE#ca+"4L	G8"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "f|*yQ-"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "We4eW}6e[e4gp>"yl"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "axvwD?f@eicBfUx"e

1DHf'eJffFc5gObQe*1E|VehSfaB
0	HWf@Yff1E@=Cdy4?f|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "f$df/fv.ff$9@J7f"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "fB;f+eh^fe|cCfcf$eQbG)L{J*efMfre/e+<eRf"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "|fuf:Vfo"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "j{f[f-BfAf eDfdfVG@gf fj_,e(lfPeUeRe&fsnf(f+A*f!8Vwf\e/frLZf.	fL$f.fY7s2y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "fOffipeD-|cOu5>qI4OD	@4D4J4'lJ)>D54-[7]:4S7]+A7]06go_c34"Y)JgFg<Mg>gPgOR1SgD4
y!6Hhg:fg,0cg9<tfcBKEUgLPSfA<[eA_JoegqV]G]EHx"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "g`&Lg
}|	Zo<)M\g@1?Z 0B/`UR5N9x?~"?Ov6KQ@f
0CEK6,')*ATg9PleJ &LJ;JW>r$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8A;s>x/H]>e6!6gz6y]uLH1R0~cf;<eHf5c!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "x*f"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">2DgbI)Z5SpZ%dN(8g{VE*.+Sx4`NLPMV]=nG6;Fe*g#4,GY<:1
EeqQ'T^6oMe"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">+PXWKmdemJ?>&g5}	|(f%<e`*/V zg$Zkg-_s="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ZE4f9f|`&`em|gX=bg"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "bhx_Hhhhg`.h "
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "s*<)h`m"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">RJ/h#h``,h
.h h`V`:h`-BSW*"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "0h}_V`8'hBZCl'>h`I14hCh!OEhOhx_`JhShLhWWh}_`Ah#6h$h}_mah];^h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-feK/BFh7h|`zSh"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-&?Ghr`
M'h\*shdhJ`m`~hSh\*jhK2h"hhU`Zh|I^6Z9?jh#mY(H{hhhZ09xhgfAbl2sy2`xZ0S.h}'h`x"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "m%)chx`hShh7hs.h&h8h{h`3h;h`,@h+h.hEhNhAh<h@h`hhhMh|gKhth1hhGhSh}_9hQhfM1rughN
h5hPhHhh`heh"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">RhifhNNh@hghihNhEhvhvhi{iohf=$hIvhD"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ShehJ`}`rh{h
i[8}h6'h'i?`s`/iish{hV_3iH&i"ih4izhhahD`Q`AP"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "iAiD%Ci,5ik*7iE`|?h,iMi*i"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "9hLt4h^7)-i4gss6f76o#?ss2iMbXi&h-h>i:i5i"DfwnK$:i
o<i[h;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?idi`-1L4?PiDi=f<g*L&IiXKi-id>iOh2h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "UiWi4iYi//sauIi,-iLit=iPiciUhBiti3i=7ji)57i07YZ{zoi;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "qiaiZi87{lM"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "4hP4Iq;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "+:j"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "_iMi9jPiD<jl"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*jks:j`iEjzit;Hj5gc>u#WMji@pi`isi-Rj~&hi-h@j)Bj=PiZj!=GjGbj\YZQ~djPjr	:jSjii?j`,ui#?rjXi]j6iT \uj5}zjjejNii~eV^gy^=+oQi"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2YZlj7g'cvBYs1djljj/jTi+jjnjFiixhj;hjncl6jw9X&j{j}~>HMcytM~jij"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "lG/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "kg6-xk5;[l"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "lCpkLi	k4hlfz/wkr.'khh"4l|jjguk	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#lmD>O@^}B^?0T,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "l/XY02"}$|ws#k`>cW7IsI	s8Pl*)x	jU<n]l[r
&kwsTeok"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "P)mc[gQg]o?coKl@ifh	htMSh{INb%lg%Gm%:jG0xOR6PhtIGbYfbh`Bzqggkk@h_ic)WjQgfQg1@ly_Cbh`aflJlC	?F_BjA8lbrlYiy
9{isk;/Yj"lDo!Y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ikAh*jh9;njfs{-k4B="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive " mlgfyijmPhmj)mCl_zcxlMg1mKiXi>mnhm^l!m0.{elJmmklklCm7lLgmHml8hTm5mDek8mEg%c*i'?alkUV?hQhHDD{("i&GQmkmN2mmHvksm&GEB)`5k}^j+

"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "k}Ds"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "D<uI=uzv:qcz~P)|nr,-n`j#pHvV<TmXA#nXm5n*A.i!)&)J*G;]ms:gxyz8
p>Yn6gEnnWGn1nvV<.#nQnBEDDm>-r.;+@+ c-gti'nM:~w2n<#W&e`jS59m17yQGfIn6'yyn6ngun55izJ+8LmanTBnn2njn27Sm'{g&sdnQnV SnY"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "`m<e4l"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "h]nYn[nW"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "/}Q8p*F@eAe/D!eh@>)e&e3"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "(ep>)Dvq\AcQI2e\w"pHMM[obc^-}ob0br"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "XZ#UQO.cu
YXZmmQzT"	3p"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Vp:*e83D3"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~\jbp}jie0l-5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Qm5}GZP'>j1#"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "qqo*kBAT&!m"f|1*Cq1[{M-I6mqmI		gEY$MGcCc,t'*qG"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "0L	.aY!8q|0~Z.a@qBq_2aIQxZAq'9qa(a+hpME[_Gqe[qWQTqIv"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#ql	="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "B"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "inyoL"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Z S!iqmV <5
pRX=^'qq~@EIvqBb[:8j`[![{q	c=eL0G>}U]{EpT3p{pp6pmVI	"gZ`{[?beq"8lmgq9o	q~3reYzlRj'XZVmXZrnf-[5)eFaf "
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^ogzg
oBj^crXZ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "NNXZ7os6SEsN$ZypB?*|pHMhpR
q?^ADmVc-aeRklPq"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "JIG'inKf!g?r-:Vj{+A[xs*(:T"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^>@AArPp?I!I@AvH	H_|pspRpvpqI6C
[IjrrMvHWp=r"0)cP
gk"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Er5A|sFCN)#IMrf}P.%QjaCg"fWrt!9x.W|y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Ci>_r"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "XQZZXQopsZW"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "[
gzc8s?ql>rK\r*n"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$rIq}q)rXwx;+5	q-3{fs!q'Dp*xDG,Y qqL.#qzf?z^s,i1D02
(qu/sbCb.q-qj4/s3q\rNPqCqjZh<h}vsJqIZ[
zs]|sRq_ZZ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "El=sz=]q)a`qDar+"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "eqpp _cZkqN]sGZZ pqrc~otqlqwqnqzq}?cY?u[Os
q+[]cqdA!p]fAq1pqIs'>f;rur.)s1vK"o*q+gKpSGRdJ4q8Dhs1}63/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "4+iVscq!"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "xqev<\p	pHAO*pA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "9xa.Qtr&pOw<"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<!h"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "hfp[Z9qzMs_tA+t1tG~I{f-t;qIZKs4%y>kt	/tu-{@CqxpGsFq<"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "JhXF!pStp2*eKwOkgm#t.rI	e?sm'>X`xSNpt%M0pcNXalpbMnp>rbrp"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "r,5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "xqHr|X&pz$mjoyMd;}pOq6m'y%gl;hStii+tq5m$`W>qj'|gQro	+GZ~dAt()2"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "M5:t4s#t	lo4oGgOYKpzc1q&q]Cg=GHt`	r9/r<.t0	rD8AM"tr t&pL	rct.pthew
h\tTjqsh5rlom%
rt\atrt]@!tutMpIsrw*r rHE"r~s%rJqwAMqw+;z~y
~Dsx;~KK^h%\_*&uGzB\pxHPmttOt=ruC002u%9mw	qqr5rAtHMrr:ptt=pV,SkzmBp~	Dp
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "HegpyQJp=t{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "sp&"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "r;"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "=t!s>sWm|RpmJDHsHqG,LsLq.E%xMixFZ/;f |B;H:jG=\,|.0i^,BIaxu0 3b4bM\zT<M5uga)BM\
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "W\P"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "GN>]WTE\x\uONA\cT8]7ad\WN=IRXaTTL\WN\r?]XTT\ET|^gUoNsT\\NUvNxNr
zN|Nd\
f\guN)TN%o\(Or\s]y4u\']->(Oy\NDAN]Nv
"N]FY~`])NV"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3{\u9N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "]+]RON]Z8DR.NE\]"NV
]3VIN](!]#]Q%]/a']\*]3N,][N/]@
_N`aN5]\V7]hNOTWT)3./QpN@]B]:_D]UC<G]CRJ]=#{7b6AkT]^UO[OZ] {V<Oa]T!Oj#OZ4d9V(O="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "C_/OtQs 3Oeaw iy k4IMn>J} }R"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "kX	b"cSabyA]$lvgNYOJ]BcP|1cM"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "V]6m>le|h|fWh|hWCcY{Oe]AP{BgTPbl]	Pp
9`bVr]Pbu]P<=r]PKS}]-.P!P^t2^]
S#>;DIS!!F@P"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^^^!7^BP^dbB^>P9^>s^"^EP=Pw:^#^LP'^cPPM,^.^L0^ZP3^"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "D@i6nd"^D."yP{,@^c*/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "dtPvPwdJ^Bd1?G^)AR^P ^U^"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%_vH)~3%Qn@,_*Q/_3_8,xq5_>7_w12dY=Q=_>qV"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "r_y"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "LQB_HQ?F_=x	R	|_"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "RM_gO_5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "]QRW_bQZ_R_
__#RF&R_2R_4Ri_'R_{Q`ya;xB_Ry?xA_G_v_ixDxRL_P_YQLxR_PxRr@[_IHfnUx"RlQXx&Rvw*Rw^-R_rQ__"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":y;@c?RhX(vSUUR+_O6,5MR1_T6`5_U="
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "99`I`S+|t<_G`zx_K'++iRP`SR`hd3>	Eyf`HX)S`l```1So`(xS$@&9Si`k`_`>n`& 9Iwx,R.Ru`OSQS`*LL6}`XS>
`M=`YaZU$`GQ%:C6P>RlP`.Q`
k#CltR>R`+S`~Slf4SMYWLS$8>3w4wKw@`/bta{b-Uk S>"SV>`EXy^eOWijUgP/SH`pU 
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cZTga>a	w@abTWbCaO:EadSGazTYA"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "b|4LUeySbx)_hb	b`>{Ab\U)Nb{z[beUPUC`iygkymU(bny`XsU-b["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "dW!Wjccscmcd{u@vfg{_f{,Wwcm{/8{c6WQks{%4 bI5e{dv<b{dO~QWQ~dS~d4;Wd|8Y~|8[~o`eW_~hWa~$d-K<yWHS[wdW1H|dVDWYCBb?@Cf~qdM.dhP 2d-4Od>8yNw<fDPk{[b'M~X]~$[_~i19|SyXUwZKdTVNdxRd"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%XqTL
,X6oH	<+
)
`ddfgJ7	<XhdZEkdBXBw@Pgt`qd?*A7d2wd>{dn_
dX}"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "dd$W9ds|rPi|04l)6dk
"X_dz<wdDX0J8"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "yR1xldFndsrd69+^Pc|^Xz\zd]_Iy{}ohXe"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "YnXpXesX	eKezX"eSJ|Yca??e|Y e$|	Y.z&|Yk0z= *e"|'-Yn]vym@n*Y5e	Z8p9eoq"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "}ze7YLLD]>|fa'f^ .<ueK*'#	f'fU7PYmAUe"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "We3YYeheewH4\	`q-"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "JZnp/`-(f~g?[z-f/fK/.z;f06fUyT})Q}<mBfADfqZWGfZ,}"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "k/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "g<"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "g"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "gc[f[gz}I6Bgo[gH6vfA[ gK8}[$A	e_}
hg\~[s 0g[2g?N4g[	\7gN[-$\h}>gm-pBr\\ZFgHgTq#'j0#\prQg(\h[lVgg>[,Zg|lF9kzY&zKR/fMgg_}"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8}mg|IXTpgY[ =[[tg;Xva[e{g@s"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "\[J~"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "\L~;g\=g\~Zk[S~Dg([\X~	eZ~\4GZOg4[_}Sg9[TZc~Xge~4~\gi}S{GZm~egl*XN[~(6ft~V"M,9aBju3HZ)Dqu'I	
;;+|,SZyu^~H\TaEb@XD"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "WD8RbZk|fjNyLvOxG X?)-Ypu
p#a`$cp\{~facJ"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "7>~^vMf7"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "DO	cy~L JW}~7{Kpw
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3W"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "7Ioaiv~gh
y~Seb5"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "7+av!<0zWm<D}\	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "I4d+("
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q__9K*_xmx(xQx_xQxQx$_m'_%x['Q+Q)x,	+x/Q-x"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^x"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "p`x)Rl~^Sn~QA_=xD_mxAxR{_px)^q%_'vx_Qx,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "};}}<>}gi8A}NC}/t=}}8g
iYE:}:)}Zd:""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive " "
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive """
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "e
@e
QWCl-Z$h&h#dS,d"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Hd9;~6HtC>;(Q5<RvWx"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "S3>KY_m_G;<NXOv	*_!
xh/#`
D3J}@/8-(7ueB6{*H({=%,	[,Ty"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%,	s|~6{H[,|~s/(7u[#]v&]v
-eb/)e =CQQ%~D3k}~~D3ky~eD3k}~eDk"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "QQ%xD3k<gmtQ~[QQ%xD3ky~<gyQQ%7 D~	Fn13"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "pkY^ewd7M8`^F3jwX7:H7A
`*6)3K"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "DVU@0tf@"0	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "}H"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "@6>"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "E:eF]v"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive " gIx{;u
bY>M0D<z	a
4>&f	H4>l	^v|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">L"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%f	dt$"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ",4"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Iem	"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Qjn6"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "s"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "#"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "C"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ZWSHop"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "N6"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "tB""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "B"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "ksK("
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "-*"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ","
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ","
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "nGX"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "2\"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "`"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "b"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "d"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "IOn6F"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "
H"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "r"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "bJv"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "P"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ";R"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "cW"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "^CD3]"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "c"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "k"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "e"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "g"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "B1Qk"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "%"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "("
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "t"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "F-"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "/"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "?%t"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "3"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "D8"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "*1|"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ">"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "d"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Y*E"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "J"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "N"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "e"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ""
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "8
"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "RkfLjcw"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "{"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "<}b3
,"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "z0"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "b_4"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "M7"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "9"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "~^G, "
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "v"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "YQ&~_"K"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ".01Q"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "a'U"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "K"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive ":'"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "=1"
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
STM[1]: Receive "["
STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 14:46:04 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 15:40:55 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: H.Jeffrey@cranfield.ac.uk
Message-ID: <00991875.8AAC0560.7@swdev.si.com>
Subject: RE: mx smtpserver problem v4.1

Howard Jeffrey (H.Jeffrey@cranfield.ac.uk) writes:

>Debug logiing shows that this job is to blame, I think. Looks a bit dodgy
>what do you think.
...
>STM[1]: Receive "Subject: Software for Wendy"
>STM[1]: Receive ""
>STM[1]: Receive "sB@yB&"
>STM[1]: Receive "3*\H0!C#JH7jTaqb18^FF#/J(D"
...
>STM[1]: Receive "C)eo3gUp3R&oq/
)="qpC|mY)Qk"
>STM[1]: Receive "."
>STM[1]: Send "250 Message received and queued."
>STM[1]: Receive "p!IZ3rL1|HjeJu"
>STM[1]: Send "500 Syntax error; command unrecognized."

Looks to me like someone's sending a binary file that just happens to have what 
looks like a dot on a line by itself.  The SMTP server sends the appropriate 
"250 Message received" response, which the sending system ignores.  I'd say the 
real problem is on the SMTP client end.
--
Brian
tillman_brian@si.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 21:58:46 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 07 Jun 1995 22:53:54 EDT
From: "Bob Ball / U.Mich / 313-763-4929" <ball@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <009918B2.074A2B38.754@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu>
Subject: Phantom messages hanging mx? (help, please)

I have an MX problem which I need help in solving.

We installed MX 4.1 on our VAX/AXP cluster and it ran fine for a few months.
We then decided to move the software to another disk.  Problems started
around this time.  MX was shut down (MCP SHUTDOWN/C) and BACKUP was used
to move the directory tree to the new disk.  I edited the mx_startup.com
to find the right disk, but went through one startup before I realized I
missed the disk entry for MX_FLQ_DIR in mx_logicals.dat.

Now, whenver I start mx on the cluster, I find phantom entries being 
processed, and I don't know how to get rid of them.  There are 3 of them,
and they even showed up after I created a new queue file (MCP QUEUE CREATE).
One of these entries is shown below, 14 hours after the cluster-wide restart.
Further, after a few hours, mail continues to come in via tcp/ip, but no
mails go out.  Below is a sample from MCP QUE SHOW with this problem.
I am forced to manually shut down mx and restart it on at least one of the
nodes MICH1/MICH13/UMALP1 to get mail flowing again, and the solution is
only temporary.

Can anyone give me a fix for this?  I have edited the STATUS display
below to shorten it; our cluster has 30 or so mixed-type nodes, and run
DEC's UCX (or whatever it is called these days).

Thanks much,
bob ball (ball@umich.edu)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
MCP> que show 

Entry# Status    Size Source  Agent  Entry# Status    Size
------ ------ ------- ------ ------- ------ ------ -------
    59 INPROG    3821 SMTP   <kate@riscgs1.lngs.infn.it>
                             LOCAL       60 READY      636
                                     (waiting until  7-JUN-1995 14:13:32.45)
    94 INPROG     631 SMTP   <sidwell@hep.phys.ksu.edu>
                             LOCAL       95 READY       63
                                     (waiting until  7-JUN-1995 14:44:38.33)
   301 INPROG    1672 MAIL   <welsh@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu>
                             SMTP       353 READY     1672
   324 INPROG      97 MAIL   <freese@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu>
                             SMTP       325 READY       97
   343 INPROG     610 LOCAL  <rmoore@hpl3sn03.cern.ch>
                             SMTP       344 READY      610
   349 INPROG     299 MAIL   <khill@umalp1.physics.lsa.umich.edu>
                             SMTP       354 READY      299
   350 INPROG       0 unknwn 

%MCP-I-QENTRIES, total matching entries: 7
MCP> status
  PID     Node   Process name         Status        Agent type
-------- ------ --------------- ------------------ ------------
20600520 MICH22 MX Router       Idle               Router agent
20E00824 MICH24 MX Router       Idle               Router agent
23400BAC UMALP3 MX Router       Idle               Router agent
23E007A2 UMGAM4 MX Router       Idle               Router agent
2420025F UMGAM2 MX Router       Idle               Router agent
.
.
.
40273891 MICH1  MX Router       Idle               Router agent
43A001DE MICH17 MX Router       Idle               Router agent
20600521 MICH22 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
20E00825 MICH24 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
23400CAD UMALP3 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
23E007A3 UMGAM4 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
24200264 UMGAM2 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
.
.
.
28C00104 UMD01  MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
28E001BC UMGAM1 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
29000229 MICH13 MX Local        Waiting for #   95 Local delivery agent
292002BE UMALP1 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
.
.
.
43A001A2 MICH17 MX Local        Idle               Local delivery agent
292002C2 UMALP1 MX MLF          Idle               Mailing list/file server
20600522 MICH22 MX SMTP         Idle               SMTP delivery agent
20E00826 MICH24 MX SMTP         Idle               SMTP delivery agent
.
.
.
28E001BD UMGAM1 MX SMTP         Idle               SMTP delivery agent
294001B6 UMD03  MX SMTP         Idle               SMTP delivery agent
29600126 MICH21 MX SMTP         Waiting for #  504 SMTP delivery agent
29800138 UMALP2 MX SMTP         Idle               SMTP delivery agent
3A60013B UMALP4 MX SMTP         Idle               SMTP delivery agent
4024F645 MICH1  MX Jnet Intfc   Idle               Jnet interface agent
4026519D MICH1  MX Site Agent   Idle               Site-specific delivery agent
20600524 MICH22 MX SMTP Server  Idle               SMTP server (over TCP/IP)
20E00827 MICH24 MX SMTP Server  Idle               SMTP server (over TCP/IP)
23400CAF UMALP3 MX SMTP Server  Idle               SMTP server (over TCP/IP)
.
.
.
3A60013C UMALP4 MX SMTP Server  Idle               SMTP server (over TCP/IP)
40206D2B MICH1  MX SMTP Server  Idle               SMTP server (over TCP/IP)
29000225 MICH13 MX FLQ Manager  Idle               MX FLQ manager
292002BC UMALP1 MX FLQ Manager  Idle               MX FLQ manager
40262371 MICH1  MX FLQ Manager  Idle               MX FLQ manager
292002C1 UMALP1 MX LSV Intfc    Idle               Listserv interface agent

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 1995 16:01:20 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <AClAXrliDA@ast.home.chg.ru>
From: "Andrei A.Osipov" <osipov@ast.home.chg.ru>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu,  8 Jun 95 00:57:19 +0400 (MSD)
Subject: Request from Russia

        Dear Sir,
Can I receive some e-mail addresses of USA Universities from your
conference: vmsnet.mail.mx
Thank you in advance.
        A.A.Osipov.
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 08:29:31 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: lambert@emuvax.emich.edu
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: VMS, NEWSRC at EMU:  To Slow!!
Message-ID: <1995Jun10.175524.4401@emuvax.emich.edu>
Date: 10 Jun 95 17:55:24 EST
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Why does it take so long to startup vms on Eastern Michigan University's
system to read newsgroups?  Does it have to do with my newsrc file?  Is there a
way to make it shorter?  I am calling in normally with vt-102 emulation at
9600.  I would be 14400 but they are to stuborn to upgrade to 14400 or even
better 28800!  Thanks for anyhelp you can give me and if you need more info
from me just ask.  Thanks.

Lambert@emuvax.emich.edu

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 18:37:37 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Sylvia Wong)
Subject: Lonely Lily - Still Alive!
Date: 12 Jun 95 17:48:55 HKT
Message-ID: <3riaat$c3c@news.asiaonline.net>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU



Rumors of Lily's demise are greatly exagerated.  

As I said before,  my friend Lily lives in Hong Kong,
like me.  She loves to receive phone calls from foreign
men. She does not have computer, so I am sending 
this message for her.

If you want to call her and you are in the United States 
the number is  011 852 1747 3094.  Callers 
from other countries need to put the international 
code then 852 1747 3094.

No e-mail please.

Sylvia Wong


PS.  Lily sends her love to all the boys at new@pobox.com

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:51:34 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 20:48:33 MDT
From: Mark Tarka <ichjsmt@earth.oscs.montana.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00991C8E.58700340.9@earth.oscs.montana.edu>
Subject: RE: Lonely Lily - Still Alive!

In article <3riaat$c3c@news.asiaonline.net>,
clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca (Sylvia Wong) writes:

[NB  Quote symbol is "#" for the current message.]
#
#
#Rumors of Lily's demise are greatly exagerated.  
[Snip...]

Hmmmm....Hunter splits....someone's left holding the bag.

So do I smell intrigue, or what?  To work for a newspaper???  They're
failing by the score!

                                                 
  Mark          ichjsmt@earth.oscs.montana.edu
  [When guns are outlawed, only _management_ will have ... etc.]
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 14:48:04 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: hlaufman@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Harry B Laufman)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Customized User Notification Messages
Date: 13 Jun 1995 19:26:02 GMT
Message-ID: <3rkooa$sdl@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Hello,

     I have a list created under MX 4.1.  Its a Private list, and I want to 
send the subscribers a special welcome message, rather than the default.  I 
can't figure out how to do it.  The documentation speaks of a 
"Per-list_qualifer" being /ADD_MESSAGE.  How do I use this "/ADD_MESSAGE"?

Is that part of the define sequence as in
    DEFINE LIST FOOBAR /ADD_MESSAGE=MyWelcome.Txt ...etc?
    I tried this and couldn't get it to work.

Is it with the add instruction as in
     ADD FOOBAR /ADD_MESSAGE=MyWelcome.TXT?  Person@host

I'm beat.  Thanks for any help.

Harrington
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 17:15:30 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 1995 17:15:20 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00991D39.B9EEFC1F.24@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: Customized User Notification Messages

hlaufman@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Harry B Laufman) writes:
>
>     I have a list created under MX 4.1.  Its a Private list, and I want to 
>send the subscribers a special welcome message, rather than the default.  I 
>can't figure out how to do it.  The documentation speaks of a 
>"Per-list_qualifer" being /ADD_MESSAGE.  How do I use this "/ADD_MESSAGE"?
>
>Is that part of the define sequence as in
>    DEFINE LIST FOOBAR /ADD_MESSAGE=MyWelcome.Txt ...etc?
>    I tried this and couldn't get it to work.
>
Yes, it is part of DEFINE LIST (or MODIFY LIST).  You can also
specify a disk and directory in the file spec:

	MCP> DEFINE LIST FOOBAR/ADD=MX_MLIST_DIR:MYWELCOME.TXT....

(MX_MLIST_DIR: is the default, if it's omitted.)  How didn't that
work; it just worked for me in a test using the command above (with
/OWNER=xxxx).

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 03:18:45 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 10:29:43 -0100
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
From: Robertini@sns.it (Marco Robertini)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: MX send problem for normal users

>>Description: me and  system manager are able to do all. Other generic user
>>are >>able to receive, but if they send messages everywhere nothing happens.
>>This is log for my send:
>>...
I have not found the cause. I have checked the quotas of many users in mx_device
and nothing seemed strange to me. So I have moved MX tree onto the same
device of queue (before they were splitted on two different disks) and now
all works.
Note that MX had worked two mounths before the problem.

Many thank's for their help to:


Tom Chamberlain                 Phone: (918) 661-9744
Phillips Petroleum Company      FAX:   (918) 661-1910
269 Geoscience Building         email: twc@ppco.com
Bartlesville, OK 74004
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Conrad Ziebland - DCM Services Ltd.   Internet: conradz@dcmltd.demon.co.uk
Wilbury Way, Hitchin, Herts. SG4 0TD     Voice:         +44 (0)1462 440440

United Kingdom.                            Fax:         +44 (0)1462 441400
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

           Marco Robertini
Responsabile rete Scuola Normale Superiore
+39 50 509268             Robertini@sns.it


================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 06:31:51 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 07:28:33 EST
From: Spencer Yost <yost@ledger.co.forsyth.nc.us>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00991DB0.EB82D540.38@ledger.co.forsyth.nc.us>
Subject: RE: Customized User Notification Messages

>Hello,
>
>     I have a list created under MX 4.1.  Its a Private list, and I want to 
>send the subscribers a special welcome message, rather than the default.  I 
>can't figure out how to do it.  The documentation speaks of a 
>"Per-list_qualifer" being /ADD_MESSAGE.  How do I use this "/ADD_MESSAGE"?
>
>Is that part of the define sequence as in
>    DEFINE LIST FOOBAR /ADD_MESSAGE=MyWelcome.Txt ...etc?
>    I tried this and couldn't get it to work.
>

Make sure you have saved the configuration via an explicit "WRITE" command
while in MCP or simply exited.  Then be sure to "RESET" the MLF agent.

I have been burned by forgetting to do this s time or two (-;

+================================+====================================+
|  Spencer William Yost          |      Mis Department                |
|  Vax/VMS Systems Manager       |      Forsyth County Government     |
|  Yost@ledger.co.forsyth.nc.us  |      200 N. Main St Room 603       |
|                                |      Hall Of Justice               |
|                                |      Winston-Salem NC 27101        |
+=====================================================================+
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 07:37:09 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 07:26:51 -0500
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
From: stacks <stacks@pc-185-60.osmre.gov>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: mx_local process dies with access violation


For the past few weeks my MX_LOCAL process on all nodes (5 vaxen) have been
dying with access violations (MX_LOCAL.LOG included below sig).  

The VAX cluster consists of a 4000-300, 4000-105, 4000-90, (2) 4000-VLC plus
some alphas, but MX is only run on the VAXes.  The 4300 and 4105 have shared
DSSI disks.  The MX directory structure is set up on one of these drives,
shared thru the cluster.

Can anyone offer any insight (or do I need to supply more information?) as
to why the LOCAL process is dying?

Is there anything I can do to prevent the LOCAL process from dying?

If the preceeding question turns out to have only a negative response; can
anyone offer a reasonable method to insure the LOCAL process gets restarted
"automatically".  By this I mean without my having to get to work, check the
mail, find no mail, check the que, find everything in INPROG status, restart
MX, etc....

On the other side of the coin...  Can MX be changed (recoded) to prevent the
access violations show below?  I guess this question is for Madgoat, Inc.
:-) Hunter and company...

Many thanks in advance for any help that is offered...

-- Rick
----------
Rick Stacks, Computer Section              | They that give up essential liberty
Ark Dept Pollution Control                 | to obtain a little temporary safety
8001 National Dr. / POB 8913               | deserve neither liberty nor safety
Little Rock, AR 72219 USA                  |   -- Benjamin Franklin, 1759
email: stacks@adpce.lrk.ar.us

##### MX_LOCAL.LOG #####

%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
address=7FF6A3CC, PC=830034AC, PSL=03C00001
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name                     line       rel PC    abs PC

                                                           830034AC  830034AC
DELIVER         MAIL_ERR_HANDLER                  781      00000024  0000686A
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      935      0000003A  000069A8
----- above condition handler called with exception 08B4C3DB:
%OFF31-I-RETRYING, Delivery will be retried later
----- end of exception message
                                                           001FEC46  001FEC46
                                                           000593B4  000593B4
                                                           000596E5  000596E5
                                                           0005C6EC  0005C6EC
                                                           00054C8A  00054C8A
                                                           00054DCF  00054DCF
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      930      00000025  00006993
DELIVER         MAIL_TO_RECIPIENTS               1073      000001DA  00006B83
DELIVER         DELIVER                           709      000009A0  000066F6
PROCESS         PROCESS                           320      000004BE  00003BEF
MX_LOCAL        MX_LOCAL                           31      000003C6  00002BCA
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
address=7FF79DCC, PC=816EE8AC, PSL=03C00001
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name                     line       rel PC    abs PC

                                                           816EE8AC  816EE8AC
DELIVER         MAIL_ERR_HANDLER                  781      00000024  0000686A
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      935      0000003A  000069A8
----- above condition handler called with exception 08B4C3DB:
%OFF31-I-RETRYING, Delivery will be retried later
----- end of exception message
                                                           001FEC46  001FEC46
                                                           000593B4  000593B4
                                                           000596E5  000596E5
                                                           0005C6EC  0005C6EC
                                                           00054C8A  00054C8A
                                                           00054DCF  00054DCF
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      930      00000025  00006993
DELIVER         MAIL_TO_RECIPIENTS               1073      000001DA  00006B83
DELIVER         DELIVER                           709      000009A0  000066F6
PROCESS         PROCESS                           320      000004BE  00003BEF
MX_LOCAL        MX_LOCAL                           31      000003C6  00002BCA
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
address=7FF789CC, PC=837F00AC, PSL=03C00001
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name                     line       rel PC    abs PC

                                                           837F00AC  837F00AC
DELIVER         MAIL_ERR_HANDLER                  781      00000024  0000686A
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      935      0000003A  000069A8
----- above condition handler called with exception 08B4C3DB:
%OFF31-I-RETRYING, Delivery will be retried later
----- end of exception message
                                                           001FEC46  001FEC46
                                                           000593B4  000593B4
                                                           000596E5  000596E5
                                                           0005C6EC  0005C6EC
                                                           00054C8A  00054C8A
                                                           00054DCF  00054DCF
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      930      00000025  00006993
DELIVER         MAIL_TO_RECIPIENTS               1073      000001DA  00006B83
DELIVER         DELIVER                           709      000009A0  000066F6
PROCESS         PROCESS                           320      000004BE  00003BEF
MX_LOCAL        MX_LOCAL                           31      000003C6  00002BCA
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
address=7FF6B3CC, PC=80E4A2AC, PSL=03C00001
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name                     line       rel PC    abs PC

                                                           80E4A2AC  80E4A2AC
DELIVER         MAIL_ERR_HANDLER                  781      00000024  0000686A
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      935      0000003A  000069A8
----- above condition handler called with exception 08B4C3DB:
%OFF31-I-RETRYING, Delivery will be retried later
----- end of exception message
                                                           001FEC46  001FEC46
                                                           000593B4  000593B4
                                                           000596E5  000596E5
                                                           0005C6EC  0005C6EC
                                                           00054C8A  00054C8A
                                                           00054DCF  00054DCF
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      930      00000025  00006993
DELIVER         MAIL_TO_RECIPIENTS               1073      000001DA  00006B83
DELIVER         DELIVER                           709      000009A0  000066F6
PROCESS         PROCESS                           320      000004BE  00003BEF
MX_LOCAL        MX_LOCAL                           31      000003C6  00002BCA
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%RMS-E-FLK, file currently locked by another user
%SYSTEM-F-ACCVIO, access violation, reason mask=00, virtual
address=7FF79DCC, PC=80E71AAC, PSL=03C00001
%TRACE-F-TRACEBACK, symbolic stack dump follows
module name     routine name                     line       rel PC    abs PC

                                                           80E71AAC  80E71AAC
DELIVER         MAIL_ERR_HANDLER                  781      00000024  0000686A
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      935      0000003A  000069A8
----- above condition handler called with exception 08B4C3DB:
%OFF31-I-RETRYING, Delivery will be retried later
----- end of exception message
                                                           001FEC46  001FEC46
                                                           000593B4  000593B4
                                                           000596E5  000596E5
                                                           0005C6EC  0005C6EC
                                                           00054C8A  00054C8A
                                                           00054DCF  00054DCF
DELIVER         SEND_MESSAGE                      930      00000025  00006993
DELIVER         MAIL_TO_RECIPIENTS               1073      000001DA  00006B83
DELIVER         DELIVER                           709      000009A0  000066F6
PROCESS         PROCESS                           320      000004BE  00003BEF
MX_LOCAL        MX_LOCAL                           31      000003C6  00002BCA

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 08:53:47 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 1995 09:51:12 EDT
From: Brian <reed@cbict3.cb.att.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <00991DC4.D8DD7602.1@cbict3.cb.att.com>
Subject: subscribe

subscribe reed@cbict3.cb.att.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 02:00:03 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 08:54:10 WET_DST
From: Hubert Ulliac - Universite de Haute Bretagne <Hubert.Ulliac@Uhb.Fr>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00991F4F.3640B5A6.1@mailhost.uhb.fr>
Subject: Cluster alias as mailhost

Bonjour,

Perhaps it's a FAQ but ...

Is it possible to use the cluster alias as mailhost in the MX records ?

I think it is and if so, it's certainly a big advantage vs Unix
where it seems to be sources of problems (IMHO)

 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hubert ULLLIAC                     ! Telephone: (33) 99 33 52 79
Universite de Haute Bretagne       ! Telecopie: (33) 99 33 52 73
Centre de Ressources Informatiques ! 
6 Avenue Gaston Berger             ! 
F-35043 RENNES Cedex               ! E-Mail : Hubert.Ulliac@Uhb.Fr
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 07:46:30 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 08:42:19 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: Hubert.Ulliac@Uhb.Fr
Message-ID: <00991F4D.8E240B00.6@swdev.si.com>
Subject: RE: Cluster alias as mailhost

Hubert ULLLIAC (Hubert.Ulliac@Uhb.Fr) writes: 

>Is it possible to use the cluster alias as mailhost in the MX records ?

Seems to be.  Here are some MX records from our DNS.  SWDEV is the cluster 
alias:

swdev           IN      MX      0 agvax.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 antrim.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 barry.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 benzie.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 boruta.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 bush.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 cass.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 champl.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 cramer.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 eaton.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 emmore.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 frei.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 fsas.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 helzer.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 huron.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 ionia.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 koster.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 lake.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 mcgook.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 miheve.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 milsw2.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 oceana.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 olundd.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 olundj.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 ottawa.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 regan.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 rybick.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 sykes.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 terwed.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 vanden.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 ward.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 weaver.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 willia.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 wolter.si.com.
                IN      MX      0 zeqoll.si.com.
                IN      CNAME   zeqoll.si.com.
--
Brian
tillman_brian@si.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 09:39:29 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 09:19:30 -0500
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: stacks <stacks@pc-185-60.osmre.gov>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: mx_local process dies with access violation


An addendum to my previous post:

The access violations seem to occur only when processing a message that is
being handed off to Word Perfect Office for processing.  The accvio's appear
to happen about once or twice a week.

TIA for any ideas anyone may have on this...

-- Rick


================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 11:02:28 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: BG@dymaxion.ns.ca (Ben Armstrong)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: MX 4.1 Local agent quietly dies
Date: 16 Jun 1995 12:46:13 -0300
Message-ID: <3rs905$4jm@Owl.nstn.ca>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

The LOCAL delivery agent quietly dies, leaving all incoming mail
backed up.  I turned on MX_LOCAL_DEBUG.  The only thing I have left
for clues is this temporary file associated with the entry at the
top of the queue (presumably the one that made it die) ...

LCL_6A99D6F4_00991F5E_3A3A6177.TMP:

(names changed to protect the innocent ...)

Return-Path: <foo@bar.ca>
Received: from bar.Ca by dymaxion.ns.ca (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Fri, 16
          Jun 1995 10:42:58 ADT
Received: from [192.0.0.4] (blah.bar.ca [192.0.0.4]) by
          bar.Ca (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id KAA29821 for
          <fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca>; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:42:57 -0300
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 10:42:49 -0400
From: "Mr. Foo" <foo@bar.ca>
Message-ID: <51785.foo@bar.ca>
X-Minuet-Version: Minuet1.0_Beta_17Y
Reply-To: <foo@bar.ca>
X-POPMail-Charset: English
X-MX-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
To: fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca
Subject: on being foobar

... body of message deleted ...

OK.  Does Minuet 1.0 Beta 17Y give you any clues?

I would have expected to see a "To:" header of
'fubar::foobar'@dymaxion.ns.ca but not fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca. 
I can't even get a mailer around here to create that kind of address
to test it.  They all balk at the double-colon.

Help!

This is causing a fairly major nuisance factor of periodically having
to shut down/startup mail again (once every few days) to bring the
Local agent back.

Ben.
--
Ben Armstrong, Medianet Development Group,     bus: (902)422-1973
Dymaxion Research Ltd., 5515 Cogswell St.,     fax: (902)421-1267
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 1R2      Internet: BArmstrong@dymaxion.ns.ca
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 11:57:33 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 11:55:14 -0500 (CDT)
From: the wizard of BSU <DMILLER@VAX1.BEMIDJI.MSUS.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <950619115514.47e7@VAX1.BEMIDJI.MSUS.EDU>
Subject: LOCAL Agent crashing ...

Folks ...

Oh boy .. am I in trouble. The LOCAL agent won't run and I can't figure out
why.

	MX_LOCAL.LOG shows error 10018294 - file not found.

DEF/SYS/EXEC MX_LOCAL_DEBUG "TRUE" doesn't produce any usable output .. just
that its processing a message

How do I find out what file its looking for?

//----------\|/------\\    Dave Miller.
||      /\  -X-      ||    Professor, Computer Science.
||     /  \ /|/\     ||
||    /    \ /  \    ||    DMILLER@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.EDU
||   /      \    \   ||
||  /________\____\  ||    1500 Birchmont Dr. NE
||      ||    ||     ||    Bemidji State University
\\------||    -------//    Bemidji MN, 56601

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 12:53:40 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 12:51:38 CDT
From: Dave Miller <system@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <009921CB.E192E260.2@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Subject: SITE agent never shutdown

Folks ...

I've notice that the SITE Agent isn't shutdown with the MCP SHUT command. In
fact it goes into a loop, eating up the CPU. Also the SITE Agent isn't shown
in the MCP STATUS listing. 

Is this a known problem or do I have a local configuration problem?

//----------\|/------\\    Dave Miller.
||      /\  -X-      ||    Professor, Computer Science.
||     /  \ /|/\     ||
||    /    \ /  \    ||    SYSTEM@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.EDU
||   /      \    \   ||
||  /________\____\  ||    1500 Birchmont Dr. NE
||      ||    ||     ||    Bemidji State University
\\------||    -------//    Bemidji MN, 56601

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 13:13:38 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 12:51:38 CDT
From: Dave Miller <system@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <009921CB.E192E260.2@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Subject: SITE agent never shutdown

Folks ...

I've notice that the SITE Agent isn't shutdown with the MCP SHUT command. In
fact it goes into a loop, eating up the CPU. Also the SITE Agent isn't shown
in the MCP STATUS listing. 

Is this a known problem or do I have a local configuration problem?

//----------\|/------\\    Dave Miller.
||      /\  -X-      ||    Professor, Computer Science.
||     /  \ /|/\     ||
||    /    \ /  \    ||    SYSTEM@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.EDU
||   /      \    \   ||
||  /________\____\  ||    1500 Birchmont Dr. NE
||      ||    ||     ||    Bemidji State University
\\------||    -------//    Bemidji MN, 56601

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 15:55:29 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <199506192053.NAA15803@whistler.sfu.ca>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 1995 13:53:34 -0700
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: randy@sfu.ca
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: MX SMTP server and Multinet's POP3

I am trying to set up a popserver on my VAX which is running Multinet and
MX.  I have the Multinet POP3 service enabled.  Everything works okay when
a message is sent from a client (running Eudora in this case) which has an
Internet address e.g. randy@sfu.ca.  The MX SMTP server responses
correctly.  However, if a message is sent to RANDY,  the VAX id, the MX
SMTP server 
rejects the message.

I have another machine just running Multinet without MX.  In this case, the
Multinet SMTP server quite happily handles both forms of address.

Does anyone know of a solution so that the MX SMTP server will accept both
forms of addresses?  

Thanks.

---
Randy Raine                      |
Operations & Technical Support   |  Voice:    (604) 291-4447
Simon Fraser University          |  Fax:      (604) 291-4242
Burnaby, B.C.  V5A 1S6           |  Internet: randy@sfu.ca

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 08:28:20 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 08:26:25 CDT
From: Dave Miller <system@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <0099226F.FF226014.341@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Subject: MX and NETLIB

Folks ..

The saga continues ...

Apparently ever since I loaded the latest NETLIB, I've had problems with MX.
Here is the morning's set ...

1. I had to MCP> RESET/CLUSTER to get messages delivered. Somehow the link
between MX_ROUTER and LOCAL is busted.

2. MX is multi-delivering messages.

3. LOCAL keeps falling over .. probably because of bad data.

Can I revert to an older NETLIB? Will that help?

ps. I apologize if you've already answered this .. my mail is so flakey that
I'm probably missing many messages. Please send the answer again.

//----------\|/------\\    Dave Miller.
||      /\  -X-      ||    Professor, Computer Science.
||     /  \ /|/\     ||
||    /    \ /  \    ||    SYSTEM@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.EDU
||   /      \    \   ||
||  /________\____\  ||    1500 Birchmont Dr. NE
||      ||    ||     ||    Bemidji State University
\\------||    -------//    Bemidji MN, 56601
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 11:14:35 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 11:14:20 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: SYSTEM@BEAVER.BEMIDJI.MSUS.EDU
Message-ID: <00992287.742C5DCD.17@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: MX and NETLIB

Dave Miller <system@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu> writes:
>
>Apparently ever since I loaded the latest NETLIB, I've had problems with MX.
>Here is the morning's set ...
>
>1. I had to MCP> RESET/CLUSTER to get messages delivered. Somehow the link
>between MX_ROUTER and LOCAL is busted.
>
Make sure that MX_FLQ_NODE_NAME is defined the same on all members of
your cluster!  This could also account for SITE not going away.

>2. MX is multi-delivering messages.
>
>3. LOCAL keeps falling over .. probably because of bad data.
>
>Can I revert to an older NETLIB? Will that help?

It won't help.  It sounds like your MX queue file is corrupted.  I
would recommend doing a QUEUE SYNCH, at least, then find the LOCAL
process that's missing its files.  The debug log should show what
entry it's starting to work on---my bet is that the files aren't there
for some reason.  Delete that entry, and any others like it, and you
should get things going again.

I'm out for the next week, so any other replies from me won't be until
next Tuesday....

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 11:16:47 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 11:16:17 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992287.BA3D3049.5@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: MX SMTP server and Multinet's POP3

randy@sfu.ca writes:
>
>I am trying to set up a popserver on my VAX which is running Multinet and
>MX.  I have the Multinet POP3 service enabled.  Everything works okay when
>a message is sent from a client (running Eudora in this case) which has an
>Internet address e.g. randy@sfu.ca.  The MX SMTP server responses
>correctly.  However, if a message is sent to RANDY,  the VAX id, the MX
>SMTP server 
>rejects the message.
>
>I have another machine just running Multinet without MX.  In this case, the
>Multinet SMTP server quite happily handles both forms of address.
>
MX's SMTP server adheres to RFC821 more rigidly than MultiNet does. 
Are you using MX V4.1?  I thought I made V4.1 more flexible.  The
problem is that, according to RFC821, the RCPT TO: lines must include
<user@Host>, not just <user>.

You can also fix Eudora to append a node name if one is missing.  That
would solve the problem as well.

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:29:36 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:27:06 CDT
From: Dave Miller <system@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992291.9E81EE00.27@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu>
Subject: RE: MX and NETLIB

> > Dave Miller <system@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.edu> writes:
> >
> >3. LOCAL keeps falling over .. probably because of bad data.
> >
> >Can I revert to an older NETLIB? Will that help?

> Hunter replies ...
> 
> It won't help.  It sounds like your MX queue file is corrupted.  I
> would recommend doing a QUEUE SYNCH, at least, then find the LOCAL
> process that's missing its files.  The debug log should show what
> entry it's starting to work on---my bet is that the files aren't there
> for some reason.  Delete that entry, and any others like it, and you
> should get things going again.
> 
> I'm out for the next week, so any other replies from me won't be until
> next Tuesday....

I came to the corruption conclusion earlier today. I tried to QUE CAN the bad
entries but they appeared faster than I could fix 'um. So I blew away the
existing queue by CREAT-ing a fresh one. And my problems all vanished.

Thanks for the confirmation, Hunter.

//----------\|/------\\    Dave Miller.
||      /\  -X-      ||    Professor, Computer Science.
||     /  \ /|/\     ||
||    /    \ /  \    ||    SYSTEM@BEAVER.Bemidji.MSUS.EDU
||   /      \    \   ||
||  /________\____\  ||    1500 Birchmont Dr. NE
||      ||    ||     ||    Bemidji State University
\\------||    -------//    Bemidji MN, 56601

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 12:52:32 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <199506201750.KAA02756@whistler.sfu.ca>
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 10:50:38 -0700
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: randy@sfu.ca
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: RE: MX SMTP server and Multinet's POP3

>randy@sfu.ca writes:
>>
>>I am trying to set up a popserver on my VAX which is running Multinet and
>>MX.  I have the Multinet POP3 service enabled.  Everything works okay when
>>a message is sent from a client (running Eudora in this case) which has an
>>Internet address e.g. randy@sfu.ca.  The MX SMTP server responses
>>correctly.  However, if a message is sent to RANDY,  the VAX id, the MX
>>SMTP server 
>>rejects the message.
>>
>>I have another machine just running Multinet without MX.  In this case, the
>>Multinet SMTP server quite happily handles both forms of address.
>>
>MX's SMTP server adheres to RFC821 more rigidly than MultiNet does. 
>Are you using MX V4.1?  I thought I made V4.1 more flexible.  The
>problem is that, according to RFC821, the RCPT TO: lines must include
><user@Host>, not just <user>.
>
>You can also fix Eudora to append a node name if one is missing.  That
>would solve the problem as well.
>
>Hunter

I'm still on MX V3.1, with V4.1 on the To Do list.  Time to bump up the
priority.  Thanks.

Randy

---
Randy Raine                      |
Operations & Technical Support   |  Voice:    (604) 291-4447
Simon Fraser University          |  Fax:      (604) 291-4242
Burnaby, B.C.  V5A 1S6           |  Internet: randy@sfu.ca

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 18:34:23 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 1995 16:32:30 PST
From: "Rick Leiber USGS-ISD, Menlo Park, CA (415-329-4052)" <rleiber@isdmnl.wr.usgs.gov>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
CC: pmurphy@isdmnl.wr.usgs.gov
Message-ID: <009922B3.E6C535A4.42@isdmnl.wr.usgs.gov>
Subject: MX/X.400 MAIL GATEWAY

Greetings:

Was wondering if anyone might have an idea on how to gateway X.400 and
MX?  It there perhaps an upgrade that will support this requirement our
site has?  We are currently running - MX V4.1 VAX.

Thanks,
***********************************************************
* Rick Leiber		   VAX/SUN Systems Manager        *
*  Recom Technologies   @   US Geological Survey          *                     
*   TELE: 415-329-4052       Menlo Park, CA, USA 94025    *                
*    FAX: 415-329-4026        INTERNET/E-Mail:            *
*     E PLURIBUS UNUM          rleiber@isdmnl.wr.usgs.gov *       
***********************************************************

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 21 Jun 1995 08:08:53 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 1995 09:02:42 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: rleiber@isdmnl.wr.usgs.gov
Message-ID: <0099233E.3B2D4F20.20@swdev.si.com>
Subject: RE: MX/X.400 MAIL GATEWAY

Rick Leiber (rleiber@isdmnl.wr.usgs.gov) writes:

>Was wondering if anyone might have an idea on how to gateway X.400 and
>MX?  It there perhaps an upgrade that will support this requirement our
>site has?  We are currently running - MX V4.1 VAX.

While MX can't act as an X.400 gateway itself, it is typical for X.400 
providers, such as MCI, to provide those gateways and one can send X.400 mail 
from MX by addressing the mail to something like"

mx%"'/S=TILLMAN/G=BRIAN/C=US/ADMD=.../.../.../'@mcimail.com"

I don't know if this helps, but I hope so.
--
Brian
tillman_brian@si.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 04:04:47 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:02:51 +0200
From: "Rok Vidmar, NUK Ljubljana" <rok.vidmar@nuk.uni-lj.si>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992418.2E3D4D30.3@nuk.uni-lj.si>
Subject: RE: LOCAL Agent crashing ...

> Folks ...
>
> Oh boy .. am I in trouble. The LOCAL agent won't run and I can't figure out
> why.
>
> 	MX_LOCAL.LOG shows error 10018294 - file not found.
>
> DEF/SYS/EXEC MX_LOCAL_DEBUG "TRUE" doesn't produce any usable output .. just
> that its processing a message
>
> How do I find out what file its looking for?

 The file is unimportant, as it is not there: you want to know the entry number
which misses the file:

$ mcr mx_exe:mcp que sho/full/output=0.tmp
$ search 0.tmp/window=(9,3) [no

 Do not CANCEL entries found in this way; just READY them! Use the original
entry number (the one on the top of the record).

Regards,

Rok Vidmar                       Internet:  rok.vidmar@uni-lj.si
National and University Library  Phone:     +386 61 125 4218
Turjaska 1, 61000 Ljubljana      Fax:       +386 61 125 5007
Slovenia



================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 04:06:53 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:04:58 +0200
From: "Rok Vidmar, NUK Ljubljana" <rok.vidmar@nuk.uni-lj.si>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992418.7A5A7850.1@nuk.uni-lj.si>
Subject: RE: SITE agent never shutdown

> Folks ...
>
> I've notice that the SITE Agent isn't shutdown with the MCP SHUT command. In
> fact it goes into a loop, eating up the CPU. Also the SITE Agent isn't shown
> in the MCP STATUS listing.
>
> Is this a known problem or do I have a local configuration problem?

 It is local. I bet SITE was eating up the CPU before you entered your command.

Regards,

Rok Vidmar                       Internet:  rok.vidmar@uni-lj.si
National and University Library  Phone:     +386 61 125 4218
Turjaska 1, 61000 Ljubljana      Fax:       +386 61 125 5007
Slovenia



================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 04:09:22 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 11:07:24 +0200
From: "Rok Vidmar, NUK Ljubljana" <rok.vidmar@nuk.uni-lj.si>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992418.D109C8E0.10@nuk.uni-lj.si>
Subject: RE: MX and NETLIB

> >Apparently ever since I loaded the latest NETLIB, I've had problems with MX.
> >Here is the morning's set ...
> >
> >1. I had to MCP> RESET/CLUSTER to get messages delivered. Somehow the link
> >between MX_ROUTER and LOCAL is busted.
> >
> Make sure that MX_FLQ_NODE_NAME is defined the same on all members of
> your cluster!  This could also account for SITE not going away.
>
> >2. MX is multi-delivering messages.
> >
> >3. LOCAL keeps falling over .. probably because of bad data.
> >
> >Can I revert to an older NETLIB? Will that help?
>
> It won't help.  It sounds like your MX queue file is corrupted.  I
> would recommend doing a QUEUE SYNCH, at least, then find the LOCAL
> process that's missing its files.  The debug log should show what
> entry it's starting to work on---my bet is that the files aren't there
> for some reason.  Delete that entry, and any others like it, and you
> should get things going again.

 Why delete it? ROUTER can make the files whenever you like! READY it!

> I'm out for the next week, so any other replies from me won't be until
> next Tuesday....
>
> Hunter
> ------
> Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
> goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU

Regards,

Rok Vidmar                       Internet:  rok.vidmar@uni-lj.si
National and University Library  Phone:     +386 61 125 4218
Turjaska 1, 61000 Ljubljana      Fax:       +386 61 125 5007
Slovenia



================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 22 Jun 1995 13:28:40 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: BG@dymaxion.ns.ca (Ben Armstrong)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: MX 4.1 Local agent quietly dies
Date: 22 Jun 1995 13:23:13 -0300
Message-ID: <3sc5dh$dnt@Owl.nstn.ca>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Ben Armstrong (BG@dymaxion.ns.ca) wrote:
: The LOCAL delivery agent quietly dies, leaving all incoming mail
: backed up.  I turned on MX_LOCAL_DEBUG.  The only thing I have left
: for clues is this temporary file associated with the entry at the
: top of the queue (presumably the one that made it die) ...

I've confirmed that it always stops only when sending to an address of
the form "fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca".  So I'm going to be bold and
say it is a problem with this particular version of Minuet which
allows this sort of address.  Does anyone else have this problem? 
Know of a fix?  I don't have any control over what mailer is used, so
my preference would be for the local delivery agent not to die.

: LCL_6A99D6F4_00991F5E_3A3A6177.TMP:

: (names changed to protect the innocent ...)

: Return-Path: <foo@bar.ca>
: Received: from bar.Ca by dymaxion.ns.ca (MX V4.1 VAX) with SMTP; Fri, 16
:           Jun 1995 10:42:58 ADT
: Received: from [192.0.0.4] (blah.bar.ca [192.0.0.4]) by
:           bar.Ca (8.6.10/8.6.10) with SMTP id KAA29821 for
:           <fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca>; Fri, 16 Jun 1995 10:42:57 -0300
: Date: Fri, 16 Jun 95 10:42:49 -0400
: From: "Mr. Foo" <foo@bar.ca>
: Message-ID: <51785.foo@bar.ca>
: X-Minuet-Version: Minuet1.0_Beta_17Y
: Reply-To: <foo@bar.ca>
: X-POPMail-Charset: English
: X-MX-Warning:   Warning -- Invalid "To" header.
: To: fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca
: Subject: on being foobar

: ... body of message deleted ...

: OK.  Does Minuet 1.0 Beta 17Y give you any clues?

: I would have expected to see a "To:" header of
: 'fubar::foobar'@dymaxion.ns.ca but not fubar::foobar@dymaxion.ns.ca. 
: I can't even get a mailer around here to create that kind of address
: to test it.  They all balk at the double-colon.

: Help!

: This is causing a fairly major nuisance factor of periodically having
: to shut down/startup mail again (once every few days) to bring the
: Local agent back.

Cheers,
Ben.
--
Ben Armstrong, Medianet Development Group,     bus: (902)422-1973
Dymaxion Research Ltd., 5515 Cogswell St.,     fax: (902)421-1267
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada B3J 1R2      Internet: BArmstrong@dymaxion.ns.ca
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 06:32:43 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: hunt@blade.wcc.govt.nz (Martin D. Hunt)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: MX local dies
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 95 10:30:42 +1200
Message-ID: <3sko1l$ndg@golem.wcc.govt.nz>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Our local agent keeps dieing with the following status in the log file:

25-JUN-1995 17:19:29.89:  MX Local (pid 20649C6F) starting
25-JUN-1995 17:24:32.19:  MX Local (pid 20649C6F) exiting, status = 1C278034

The following message seems to be causing the problem:

Return-Path: <dbm-list-owner@lists.Stanford.EDU>
Received: from lists.Stanford.EDU by kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (MX V4.1 VAX) with
          SMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 20:13:58 +1200
Received: from mime-gate.rl.ac.uk (mime-gate.rl.ac.uk [130.246.74.63]) by
          lists.Stanford.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id AAA03979 for
          <dbm-list@lists.Stanford.EDU>; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 00:32:34 -0700
Errors-To: mail-errors@lists.Stanford.EDU
Received: from ccMail by mime-gate.rl.ac.uk (IMA Internet Exchange v1.04) id
          fea6e5e0; Fri, 23 Jun 95 08:33:50 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 08:33:36 +0100
Message-ID: <fea6e5e0@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk>
From: Kevin.D.O'Neill@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk (Kevin D O'Neill)
Subject: Chris's fan club (Was: Re: DBM 1.2:  My thoughts)
To: dbm-list@lists.Stanford.EDU (DBM Mailing List)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
[body of message deleted]

I have a feeling that it is objecting to the "From:" line. This guy seems 
to have been posting a number of messages to the list, and they are killing 
the local agent every time. What can I do to stop this happening?

We are running MX V4.1

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin D. Hunt			This space contains nothing important
Systems Administrator		because I can't think of what to put.
Wellington City Council		hunt@wcc.govt.nz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 06:59:05 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Carl J Lydick)
Subject: Re: MX local dies
Date: 25 Jun 1995 23:16:38 GMT
Message-ID: <3skqom$rs8@gap.cco.caltech.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

In article <3sko1l$ndg@golem.wcc.govt.nz>, hunt@blade.wcc.govt.nz (Martin D. Hunt) writes:
=Our local agent keeps dieing with the following status in the log file:
=
=25-JUN-1995 17:19:29.89:  MX Local (pid 20649C6F) starting
=25-JUN-1995 17:24:32.19:  MX Local (pid 20649C6F) exiting, status = 1C278034

That's
	%MX-F-MEMALLOC, error allocating memory from zone !AS

=The following message seems to be causing the problem:
=
=Return-Path: <dbm-list-owner@lists.Stanford.EDU>
=Received: from lists.Stanford.EDU by kosmos.wcc.govt.nz (MX V4.1 VAX) with
=          SMTP; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 20:13:58 +1200
=Received: from mime-gate.rl.ac.uk (mime-gate.rl.ac.uk [130.246.74.63]) by
=          lists.Stanford.EDU (8.6.12/8.6.6) with SMTP id AAA03979 for
=          <dbm-list@lists.Stanford.EDU>; Fri, 23 Jun 1995 00:32:34 -0700
=Errors-To: mail-errors@lists.Stanford.EDU
=Received: from ccMail by mime-gate.rl.ac.uk (IMA Internet Exchange v1.04) id
=          fea6e5e0; Fri, 23 Jun 95 08:33:50 +0100
=MIME-Version: 1.0
=Date: Fri, 23 Jun 1995 08:33:36 +0100
=Message-ID: <fea6e5e0@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk>
=From: Kevin.D.O'Neill@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk (Kevin D O'Neill)
=Subject: Chris's fan club (Was: Re: DBM 1.2:  My thoughts)
=To: dbm-list@lists.Stanford.EDU (DBM Mailing List)
=Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
=Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
=Content-Description: cc:Mail note part
=[body of message deleted]
=
=I have a feeling that it is objecting to the "From:" line.

Doesn't look like it to me, offhand.  I've just tried sending mail using a MAIL
FROM: field of Kevin.D.O'Neill@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk, without problems.  Why don't
you enable debugging of the local agent?
	$ DEFINE/SYS/EXEC MX_LOCAL_DEBUG *
then look at the file MX_LOCAL_DIR:MX_LOCAL_LOG.LOG to see what that tells you?
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Carl J Lydick | INTERnet: CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU | NSI/HEPnet: SOL1::CARL

Disclaimer:  Hey, I understand VAXen and VMS.  That's what I get paid for.  My
understanding of astronomy is purely at the amateur level (or below).  So
unless what I'm saying is directly related to VAX/VMS, don't hold me or my
organization responsible for it.  If it IS related to VAX/VMS, you can try to
hold me responsible for it, but my organization had nothing to do with it.
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 14:45:54 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:15:23 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992760.1F8CDF80.15@swdev.si.com>
Subject: Re: MX local dies

Carl Lydick (CARL@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU) writes:

>Doesn't look like it to me, offhand.  I've just tried sending mail using a MAIL
>FROM: field of Kevin.D.O'Neill@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk, without problems.  Why don't
>you enable debugging of the local agent?
>	$ DEFINE/SYS/EXEC MX_LOCAL_DEBUG *
>then look at the file MX_LOCAL_DIR:MX_LOCAL_LOG.LOG to see what that tells you?

I just tried to send to that address, too.  Here's what QUEUE SHOW/FULL says 
about that entry:

Entry: 10, Origin: [Local] <tillman@swdev.si.com>
  Status: FINISHED, size: 0 bytes
  Created: 26-JUN-1995 15:08:29.95, expires 26-JUL-1995 15:08:29.95
  Last modified 26-JUN-1995 15:08:32.65

Notice that there is no Recipient #1 line in the entry.  And, if I examine the 
.HDR_INFO file, I see the following (with the header keywords properly 
inserted):

Received: by swdev.si.com (MX V4.1 VAX) id 10; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:08:31 EDT
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:08:30 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
To: x%"Kevin.D.O'Neill@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk
Message-ID: <0099275F.2983A4C0.10@swdev.si.com>
Subject: Test

Notice the funny "To:" header  I suspect the presence of the apostrophe is 
causing MX some problems because an apostrophe is used to provide a way to 
insert a quote into an address and there is no matching closing apostrophe.
--
Brian
tillman_brian@si.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 19:20:10 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 15:47:47 EDT
From: Brian <reed@cbict3.cb.att.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <00992764.A64A92DE.1@cbict3.cb.att.com>
Subject: Refusing mail, local hosts


I have a few questions on MX.  I have an AXP 3000/600, VMS 6.1, 
UCX 3.2, MX 4.1.

1) MX is refusing some mail, apparently because the from field does not
   follow a standard.  For example, by boss uses a PC, and sends mail
   to cbfpa!bdr, which I have forwarded to my machine.  It seems that
   the bang path is not a valid form.  This may be true for internet 
   addresses, but since it's originating not from an internet address,
   it has the bang path.  Is there any way to get MX to accept mail,
   regardless of the from field?  From what I've heard, the mail
   headers can get messed up anyway, so it doesn't seem like something
   you could rely on anyway.   Rejecting the boss's mail isn't a good
   idea, so I've gone back to UCX, as it accepts the mail.

2) It appears MX insists on using the name server, instead of my local
   host database.  For various reasons, we have several machines that
   aren't in the name server, and never will be.  So when I try to send
   mail to these, it finds no record, forwards it to the mail server,
   which then rejects it, because it can't find a record.  All other
   software I've used (telnet, ftp, etc.) (or is it the TCP/IP that does
   it) looks first in the local database, then the name server if it
   doesn't find it there.  Is there a way to get MX to use the local
   database for hostnames?

3) Is there a way to have MX parse the send-to field?  For example, in
   replying to a news posting, many times people have personal names
   imbedded in the address.  It appears to be consistent in how they
   are structured, so it is possible to parse them.  Now, I do it by
   hand, but a great job for a computer to do.  For example, it 
   might be "Cool Joe <joe@cool.com>" or "joe@cool.com (Joe Cool)"
   sometimes they actually have quotes in the address.  MX complains
   about 'invalid field' or something to that effect.

Thanks,

Brian D. Reed
AT&T Columbus Works
Brian.D.Reed@att.com
614-860-6218
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Mon, 26 Jun 1995 21:09:39 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: hlaufman@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu (Harry B Laufman)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Generate a confirmation of receipt?
Date: 27 Jun 1995 02:06:51 GMT
Message-ID: <3snp3r$qni@charm.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

We want an address which anyone can send to, its for submission to a calender
scheduler.  We decided to try an archived mailing list with only the editor of
the calender as a subscriber (the archive is in his directory too).  This will
work, but I'd like to arrange for the senders to receive a standard reply,
such as "Thank you for your submission to the Calender Project..."  Can anyone 
see a way to do this?

There might be a better way to do this, I'm open to ideas.

Thanks,
Harrington
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 12:12:45 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 12:12:28 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <0099280F.BC2ABBEB.4@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: MX and NETLIB

"Rok Vidmar, NUK Ljubljana" <rok.vidmar@nuk.uni-lj.si> writes:
>
>> for some reason.  Delete that entry, and any others like it, and you
>> should get things going again.
>
> Why delete it? ROUTER can make the files whenever you like! READY it!
>
Thanks, Rok.  That is true.  I was thinking of cases where the Router
was dying; those have to be deleted.

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 12:16:02 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 12:15:49 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992810.345A091E.6@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: Refusing mail, local hosts

Brian <reed@cbict3.cb.att.com> writes:
>
>1) MX is refusing some mail, apparently because the from field does not
>   follow a standard.  For example, by boss uses a PC, and sends mail
>   to cbfpa!bdr, which I have forwarded to my machine.  It seems that
>   the bang path is not a valid form.  This may be true for internet 

MX won't reject it based on the From: field.  Instead, it's probably
rejecting it because the RFC821 RCPT TO: line is not in a valid RFC821
format.

>   you could rely on anyway.   Rejecting the boss's mail isn't a good
>   idea, so I've gone back to UCX, as it accepts the mail.
>
MX does adhere to the RFCs.

>2) It appears MX insists on using the name server, instead of my local
>   host database.  For various reasons, we have several machines that
>   aren't in the name server, and never will be.  So when I try to send
>   mail to these, it finds no record, forwards it to the mail server,
>   which then rejects it, because it can't find a record.  All other
>   software I've used (telnet, ftp, etc.) (or is it the TCP/IP that does
>   it) looks first in the local database, then the name server if it
>   doesn't find it there.  Is there a way to get MX to use the local
>   database for hostnames?
>
I know of no way to have it do that.  The problem is that your UCX
clients know about the local UCX database.  MX, which uses NETLIB to
interact with the various TCP/IP utilities, uses only the name server.

>3) Is there a way to have MX parse the send-to field?  For example, in
>   replying to a news posting, many times people have personal names
>   imbedded in the address.  It appears to be consistent in how they
>   are structured, so it is possible to parse them.  Now, I do it by
>   hand, but a great job for a computer to do.  For example, it 
>   might be "Cool Joe <joe@cool.com>" or "joe@cool.com (Joe Cool)"
>   sometimes they actually have quotes in the address.  MX complains
>   about 'invalid field' or something to that effect.
>
That's on the wish list, but I don't know when it'll get done.

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 13:56:42 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 14:54:07 EDT
From: "Jonathan E. Hardis" <hardis@garnet.nist.gov>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: hlaufman@magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu, hardis@garnet.nist.gov
Message-ID: <00992826.5154A360.10@garnet.nist.gov>
Subject: RE: Generate a confirmation of receipt?

> We want an address which anyone can send to, its for submission to a
> calender scheduler.  We decided to try an archived mailing list with only
> the editor of the calender as a subscriber (the archive is in his directory
> too).  This will work, but I'd like to arrange for the senders to receive a
> standard reply, such as "Thank you for your submission to the Calender
> Project..."  Can anyone see a way to do this? 
>
> There might be a better way to do this, I'm open to ideas.

Sure -- use a SITE agent.

In your configuration, you need a hook into the SITE agent:

DEFINE PATH "calender"  SITE/ROUTE="CALENDER"

and you need a

DEFINE ALIAS "calender" "dummy@calender"

Let me explain these two lines, together.  The second says that if anyone 
sends mail to calender@your.host, where your.host is *any* address that MX 
recognizes as local to your host, then the mail will be rerouted to
dummy@calender.  Here, "calender" is a address, not a user name.  The first 
lines says that whenever "calender" appears as an address, deliver it to 
the SITE agent.

Okay.  What does the SITE_DELIVER.COM look like?

$  SET NOON
$  MX_ENTER := $MX_EXE:MX_SITE_IN
$
$! Separate processing for different routes
$
$  IF  P1 .EQS. "CALENDER"            THEN GOTO Cal_Start
$  IF  P1 .EQS. "SOMETHING_ELSE"      THEN GOTO Its_Start
$  IF  P1 .EQS. "YET_SOMETHING_ELSE"  THEN <Etc.>
$  EXIT 4
$
$!-------------------------------------------------------------------------
$
$ Cal_Start:
$
$  MX_ENTER 'P2' MX_SITE_DIR:EDITOR.TXT "''P4'"
$!  Where MX_SITE_DIR:EDITOR.TXT is a file you create that contains in it
$!  the address of the calender editor on a single line,
$!  <enclosed@in.marks.like.this>
$!
$!  Now comes the real hack.  Someone can probably tell you a better way
$!  to do this...
$!
$ open/write ofile MX_SITE_DIR:TEMP_ADDR.TXT
$ write ofile p4
$ close ofile
$!
$  MX_ENTER  MX_SITE_DIR:CONFIRM.TXT  MX_SITE_DIR:TEMP_ADDR.TXT -
                                               "<your@address.here>"
$!  Where MX_SITE_DIR:CONFIRM.TXT is a file you create that contains in it
$!  the text of your confirmation message
$!
$  DELETE MX_SITE_DIR:TEMP_ADDR.TXT;
$
$  EXIT 1

P.S. -- This untested code.  Use at your own risk.
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 18:48:15 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Tue, 27 Jun 1995 15:16:20 EDT
From: Brian <reed@cbict3.cb.att.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@wkuvx1.wku.edu
Message-ID: <00992829.6BF1BF1B.3@cbict3.cb.att.com>
Subject: RE: Refusing mail, local hosts


Hunter Goatley says about my post:

>Brian <reed@cbict3.cb.att.com> writes:
>>
>>1) MX is refusing some mail, apparently because the from field does not
>>   follow a standard.  For example, by boss uses a PC, and sends mail
>>   to cbfpa!bdr, which I have forwarded to my machine.  It seems that
>>   the bang path is not a valid form.  This may be true for internet

>MX won't reject it based on the From: field.  Instead, it's probably
>rejecting it because the RFC821 RCPT TO: line is not in a valid RFC821
>format.

I don't know why I didn't post this with my message, but here's the part 
of a bounced message, and an mx log from another bounce.
So, if I follow correctly, it never started to receive the message, 
and isn't that where the RFC headers would be?

A bounced message:
------------------

   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
Connected to cbict3.cb.att.com:
>>> MAIL From:<cbcat!bdr>
<<< 501 Invalid address: <cbcat!bdr>
554 reed@cbict3.cb.att.com... Remote protocol error

   ----- Unsent message follows -----
Return-Path: <cbcat!bdr>
Received: from cbcat.UUCP by cbfpa.cb.att.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
        id AA01266; Thu, 1 Jun 95 14:27:44 EDT
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 95 14:27:44 EDT
From: cbcat!bdr
Message-Id: <9506011827.AA01266@cbfpa.cb.att.com>
Apparently-To: bdr


An MX SMTP server log:
----------------------

STM[2]: Send "220 cbict3.cb.att.com MX V4.1 AXP SMTP server ready at Fri, 
STM[2]: Receive "HELO cbfpa.cb.att.com"
STM[2]: Send "250 Hello, cbfpa.cb.att.com"
STM[2]: Receive "MAIL From:<cbmail!rcw>"
STM[2]: Send "501 Invalid address: <cbmail!rcw>"
STM[2]: Receive "QUIT"
STM[2]: Send "221 cbict3.cb.att.com Service closing transmission channel"
STM[2]: Receive "QUIT"


Thanks again,

Brian D. Reed
AT&T Columbus Works
Brian.D.Reed@att.com
614-860-6218
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 07:30:06 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 07:29:55 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: REED@CBICT3.CB.ATT.COM
Message-ID: <009928B1.6E0EB375.4@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: Refusing mail, local hosts

Brian <reed@cbict3.cb.att.com> writes:
>
>>MX won't reject it based on the From: field.  Instead, it's probably
>>rejecting it because the RFC821 RCPT TO: line is not in a valid RFC821
>>format.
>
>I don't know why I didn't post this with my message, but here's the part 
>of a bounced message, and an mx log from another bounce.
>So, if I follow correctly, it never started to receive the message, 
>and isn't that where the RFC headers would be?
>
The RFC822 headers, yes.  The RFC821 headers are in the MX SMTP Server
log.

>An MX SMTP server log:
>----------------------
>
>STM[2]: Send "220 cbict3.cb.att.com MX V4.1 AXP SMTP server ready at Fri, 
>STM[2]: Receive "HELO cbfpa.cb.att.com"
>STM[2]: Send "250 Hello, cbfpa.cb.att.com"
>STM[2]: Receive "MAIL From:<cbmail!rcw>"
>STM[2]: Send "501 Invalid address: <cbmail!rcw>"

There: MAIL FROM: instead of RCPT TO:, but it's the same problem. 
That address is not a valid RFC821 address, which must be in the form
<user@node>.

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 08:45:26 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 09:33:04 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <009928C2.A1FE62A0.2@swdev.si.com>
Subject: RE: Refusing mail, local hosts

Brian Reed and Hunter Goatley write:

>>STM[2]: Send "220 cbict3.cb.att.com MX V4.1 AXP SMTP server ready at Fri, 
>>STM[2]: Receive "HELO cbfpa.cb.att.com"
>>STM[2]: Send "250 Hello, cbfpa.cb.att.com"
>>STM[2]: Receive "MAIL From:<cbmail!rcw>"
>>STM[2]: Send "501 Invalid address: <cbmail!rcw>"
>
>There: MAIL FROM: instead of RCPT TO:, but it's the same problem. 
>That address is not a valid RFC821 address, which must be in the form
><user@node>.

When we had this problem (because UUNET feeds us and we didn't know we could ask 
them to send us RFC821 addresses instead of bang paths), we has our MTA (smail 
on a Sun) simply add its own host name at the end (i.e. tack on "@mta" to the 
"node!user").  That made MX happy.  Is there any way this can be done for you, 
Brian?
--
Brian (good name, huh?)
tillman_brian@si.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 16:30:15 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: "Alaric S. Haag" <haag@imr00.me.lsu.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: MX reception problem to domain that is aliased to node. (Long)
Date: 28 Jun 1995 21:11:10 GMT
Message-ID: <3ssghe$1noe@te6000.otc.lsu.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

Hi folks! Hope someone out there can help!

I had our telecomm people establish a CNAME for my domain
(me.lsu.edu) tied to a specific machine (imr00.me.lsu.edu) so
that I could have my users advertise their Email addresses as
"user@me.lsu.edu". This was done on the DNS machine for the 
campus and all machines referenced below point to it to 
resolve the name "me.lsu.edu".

The machine in question is a VAXserver 4300 with VMS 5.5, UCX
2.0D and MX 3.3. I know these aren't the latest and greatest
versions, but I suspect this is a configuration problem, and not
a bug.

The basic problem is that mail sent from the "native" unix 
machines around campus to an address of the form

        user@me.lsu.edu

gets through fine, but from VMS machines using MX/UCX or another
using the Multinet stack cause a "too many visits" error. That is,
mail sent from VMSmail via IN%"user@me.lsu.edu" or MX%"user@me.lsu.edu"
causes the mail to come to imr00.me.lsu.edu and but it bounces back to 
itself over and over and I get a nasty-gram from the Postmaster 
on imr00.me.lsu.edu.

The following data may be relevant:

MX_SMTP_LOG contains:
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.96 Processing queue entry number 2198 on node IMR00
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:21.16   Recipient: <haag@me.lsu.edu>, route=me.lsu.edu
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:21.16   SMTP_SEND: looking up host name me.lsu.edu
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:21.24   SMTP_SEND: Attempting to start session with me.lsu.edu
[130.39.128.211]
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:21.25   SMTP_SEND: Connected
        ...

MX_ROUTER_LOG contains:
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:19.98 %PROCESS, Processing entry number 2197
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.06 %PROCESS, Status from READ_INFO was 00000001
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.06 %PROCESS, Recipient #0: <haag@me.lsu.edu>
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.06 %REWRITE, No rewrite rules matched <haag@me.lsu.edu>
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.21 %FINDPATH, Site-spec expand on me.lsu.edu err=00000000
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.21 %FINDPATH, domain name ME.LSU.EDU matched path pattern *
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.21 %PROCESS, Rewrote <haag@me.lsu.edu> as <haag@me.lsu.edu>
        -         next hop me.lsu.edu, path 2
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.31 %PROCESS, Adding to SMTP path: <haag@me.lsu.edu>.
        28-JUN-1995 15:24:20.54 %PROCESS, Path SMTP gets 1 rcpts, entry number 2198
MX_SMTP_SERVER_LOG contains:
        ...
        STM[3]: Send "250 MAIL command accepted."
        STM[3]: Receive "RCPT TO:<haag@me.lsu.edu>"
        STM[3]: Send "250 Recipient okay (at least in form)"
        STM[3]: Receive "DATA"
        STM[3]: Send "354 Start mail input; end with <crlf>.<crlf>"
        ...

MX (via the MCP program) is configured with no rewrite rules in 
effect and the following paths:

        MCP> sh path

        Domain-to-path mappings:
          Domain="imr00.me.lsu.edu", Path=Local
          Domain="[130.39.128.211]", Path=Local
          Domain="imrlab.dnet.lsu.edu", Path=Local
          Domain="*.UUCP", Path=SMTP, Route="uunet.uu.net"
          Domain="*.BITNET", Path=SMTP, Route="cunyvm.cuny.edu"
          Domain="*", Path=SMTP

I have tried adding a path of the form:

          Domain="me.lsu.edu", Path=Local

with no benefit.

Finally, just in case this might be a UCX problem, here is the 
core of the UCX configuration:

        $ UCX START COMM
        $ IF UCX$DOMAIN_NAME .EQS. "" THEN -
                UCX SET COMM /DOMAIN="me.lsu.edu"
        $ SET NOON
        $ UCX START NAME_SERVICE /DOMAIN=me.lsu.edu
        $ ON ERROR THEN GOTO EXIT
        $ UCX SET INTERFACE ZE0/HOST="imr00"/NOTRAIL/NETWORK_MASK=255.255.248.0/BROADCAS
        T_MASK=130.39.135.255
        $ UCX SET COMMUNICATION/LOCAL="imr00.me.lsu.edu"
        $ UCX SET INTERFACE LO0/HOST=LOCALHOST
        $ SET NOON
        $ UCX SET NAME_SERVICE/SYSTEM/SERVER=("te6000.otc.lsu.edu","tenet.otc.lsu.edu","
        tegate.otc.lsu.edu")
        $ UCX SET NAME_SERVICE/SYSTEM/ENABLE
        $ UCX SET UCX_SERV /SIGNAL
        $ SET NOON
        $ DEFINE/SYSTEM/EXE UCX$FTP_EXTLOG 1
        $ DEFINE/SYSTEM/EXE UCX$FTP_WNDSIZ      9216
        $ DEFINE/SYSTEM/EXE UCX$FTPC_SES        10
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE FTP
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE REXEC
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE RLOGIN
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE RSH
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE LPD
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE MOUNT
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE NFS
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE PORTMAPPER
        $ UCX ENABLE SERVICE TELNET
        $ DEFINE/SYSTEM/EXEC MCC_TDF "-6:00"
        $ EXIT:

Many thanks in advance of any/all suggestions!

---

Ric
%^{)

----
[ Alaric S. Haag, Computer Manager                      haag@imr00.me.lsu.edu ]
[ Louisiana State University, Mech. Engr. Dept.         FAX:   (504) 388-5924 ]
[ Baton Rouge, LA 70803                            Opinions:   (504) 388-5897 ]
                       "I've got dust in my mind's eye!!" - Me

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 16:53:09 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 1995 17:51:08 EDT
From: "Jonathan E. Hardis" <hardis@garnet.nist.gov>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: haag@imr00.me.lsu.edu, hardis@garnet.nist.gov
Message-ID: <00992908.36745080.1@garnet.nist.gov>
Subject: RE: MX reception problem to domain that is aliased to node. (Long)

> I had our telecomm people establish a CNAME for my domain
> (me.lsu.edu) tied to a specific machine (imr00.me.lsu.edu) so
> that I could have my users advertise their Email addresses as
> "user@me.lsu.edu". This was done on the DNS machine for the 
> campus and all machines referenced below point to it to 
> resolve the name "me.lsu.edu".

I don't understand.

How many machines are covered by the name me.lsu.edu?  Only one?
If not, then you have a basic problem because imr00.me.lsu.edu
has no way to tell if a me.lsu.edu address is local or not.
If so, then you simply have to configure:
          Domain="me.lsu.edu", Path=Local
as long as it's _before_ the
          Domain="*", Path=SMTP
line, and as long as you reset (or restart) the router after the new
configuration is saved.

  - Jonathan
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 05:14:32 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: hunt@blade.wcc.govt.nz (Martin D. Hunt)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: MX local dies
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 95 17:36:35 +1200
Message-ID: <3ste44$2g2@golem.wcc.govt.nz>
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU

In Article <3skqom$rs8@gap.cco.caltech.edu>
carl@SOL1.GPS.CALTECH.EDU (Carl J Lydick) writes:
>In article <3sko1l$ndg@golem.wcc.govt.nz>, hunt@blade.wcc.govt.nz (Martin D. Hunt) writes:
>=Our local agent keeps dieing with the following status in the log file:
>=
>=25-JUN-1995 17:19:29.89:  MX Local (pid 20649C6F) starting
>=25-JUN-1995 17:24:32.19:  MX Local (pid 20649C6F) exiting, status = 1C278034
>
>That's
>	%MX-F-MEMALLOC, error allocating memory from zone !AS
>

Ok, I've turned debug on, and this is what I get:

26-JUN-1995 10:01:36.81:  MX Local#2 (pid 20A091B2) starting
29-JUN-1995 00:04:29.45:  MX Local#2 (pid 20A091B2) exiting, status = 1C278034

29-JUN-1995 00:01:49.79 Processing queue entry number 31
29-JUN-1995 00:01:51.04   Checking local name: TAIA_A
29-JUN-1995 00:01:51.62   LOCAL_USER: Non-MX fwdg address DRAGON@MU.SANS.VUW.AC.NZ; treat as local.
29-JUN-1995 00:01:51.62     This is a regular delivery.
29-JUN-1995 00:01:52.04   DELIVER: mime_headers = 9
29-JUN-1995 00:01:52.04   DELIVER: fdlstr = ""
29-JUN-1995 00:01:52.45   DELIVER:  Using MX%"Kevin.D.O'Neill@mime-gate.rl.ac.uk" as VMS MAIL From address.
29-JUN-1995 00:01:52.52   DELIVER:  Using MX%"dbm-list@lists.stanford.edu" as VMS MAIL To address.
29-JUN-1995 00:01:52.52   DELIVER:  Using  as VMS MAIL CC address.
29-JUN-1995 00:01:52.52   DELIVER:  Using "Really Using 1.2 (Was: Using DBM v1.2)" as subject.
29-JUN-1995 00:01:53.53   DELIVER:  Delivering to DRAGON@MU.SANS.VUW.AC.NZ


Hope that will shed some light on it.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Martin D. Hunt			This space contains nothing important
Systems Administrator		because I can't think of what to put.
Wellington City Council		hunt@wcc.govt.nz
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 11:34:01 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 12:26:25 EDT
From: "Melissa Thomas, Computer Services" <mdthomas@sae.ssu.umd.edu>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
CC: mdthomas@sae.ssu.umd.edu
Message-ID: <009929A4.0436B580.34@sae.ssu.umd.edu>
Subject: SMTP_SERVER Failure

     Recently we have been having problems with the SMTP SERVER process
dying, we are running VMS 5.5-2, UCX ??, and MX 4.1.  I am enclosing a
copy of the latest SMTP_SERVER and SMTP_SERVER_LOG logs as well as a
definition for the error message:

SMTP_SERVER_LOG.LOG:

STM[2]: Send "220 sae.ssu.umd.edu MX V4.1 VAX SMTP server ready at 
     Thu, 29 Jun 1995 11:56:58 EDT"
STM[2]: Receive "HELO netcom13.netcom.com"
STM[2]: Send "250 Hello, netcom13.netcom.com"

SMTP_SERVER.LOG:

29-JUN-1995 11:42:52.13:  MX SMTP Server (pid 0000089D) starting
29-JUN-1995 11:57:00.67:  MX SMTP Server (pid 0000089D) exiting,
                                          status = 1000000C

ERROR_MESSAGE:

$ SET MESSAGE MX_EXE:MX_MSG
$ WRITE SYS$OUTPUT F$MESSAGE("%X10000094")
%SYSTEM-F-ACCUIO,access violation, reason mask=!XB, virtual address=!XL,
PC=!XL, PSL=!XL.

Could some help me decipher this information?


- Melissa
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
   Melissa Thomas
   Academic Analyst                Internet: MDTHOMAS@SAE.SSU.UMD.EDU
   Salisbury State University      BITNET:   MDTHOMAS@SAE.TOWSON.EDU
   
   Take time today to give someone a hug, to share a friendly smile,
   and to recycle for a better earth tomorrow.
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 18:18:22 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <v01510100ac18d5c10ad7@[136.177.20.142]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 17:18:07 -0600
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
From: oetting@gldfs.cr.usgs.gov (Dan Oetting)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: Re: SMTP_SERVER Failure

>     Recently we have been having problems with the SMTP SERVER process
>dying, we are running VMS 5.5-2, UCX ??, and MX 4.1.

I was also seeing problems with the SMTP SERVER process dying but with exit
status = 10248074.
        $ write sys$output f$message(%x10248074)
        %STR-F-STRTOOLON, string is too long (greater than 65535)

I turned debug on and got several log files ending with
        Error: status=002C
or      Error: status=20EC

        $ write sys$output f$message(%x002c)
        %SYSTEM-F-ABORT, abort
        $ write sys$output f$message(%x20ec)
        %SYSTEM-F-LINKDISCON, network partner disconnected logical link

At this time SMTP_SERVER was no longer dying but would hang in a MUTEX
state for an extended time or untill the process was killed and restarted.
I finally noticed using ANALYZE/SYSTEM that the SMTP SERVER process had

        Timer entries allowed left    0

This quota was raised from 50 to 100 and the server no longer MUTEXed but
would hang in a HIBernate state after using 100 AST's and 99 timer que
entries.

I reinstalled and relinked SMTP (and SMTP_SERVER) without reinstalling
NETLIB because I was using NETLIB 2.0A and MX4.1 was bundled with NETLIB
1.6.

This did not help.  However after replacing NETLIB with the older version
everything is back to normal.

Is there a problem with NETLIB 2.0A?  Could NETLIB have been corrupted by
the "string is too long" error?  Should I upgrade to a more current release
of VMS?  We are running VMS 5.2, CMU-IP V6.6-6, MX 4.1 and as of yesterday,
NETLIB 1.6.


================================================================================
Archive-Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 18:26:28 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 1995 16:24:36 PST
From: "John F. Sandhoff" <syssand@CCVAX.CCS.CSUS.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: oetting@gldfs.cr.usgs.gov, syssand@CCVAX.CCS.CSUS.EDU
Message-ID: <009929C5.4A133800.109@CCVAX.CCS.CSUS.EDU>
Subject: Re: SMTP_SERVER Failure


> Recently we have been having problems with the SMTP SERVER process
> dying..

> ...after replacing NETLIB with the older version everything is back to
> normal.
> Is there a problem with NETLIB 2.0A?

DISCLAIMER: I have little useful to contribute IRT the server crashes
(well, maybe one thing... there used to be a problem with messages that
had really long header lines. Any chance you can sniff the incoming traffic
and look to see if there's a specific message coming in that's causing
the failure?)

The reason I post is that Netlib is now up to version 2.0E. Previous
versions had various bugs. 2.0E was just announced and is available:
  WWW:             http://www.wku.edu/www/madgoat/madgoat.html
  FTP:             ftp.wku.edu in [.MADGOAT] and [.VMS.FILESERV]
                   ftp.spc.edu in [.MACRO32.SAVESETS]
  Look for: NETLIB020.ZIP

Give it a try...

    John F. Sandhoff, University Network Support
      California State University, Sacramento - USA
        sandhoff@csus.edu

     "Just an invisible cog in a huge wheel"

================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 03:00:26 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 10:11:35 -0100
To: <mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu>
From: Robertini@sns.it (Marco Robertini)
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Subject: user list owner not possible (security problem)

With this definition

MCP> sh list gnafa

Mailing lists:
  Name: GNAFA
  Owner: "robertini@VAXSNS.SNS.IT"
  Reply-to: NOList, Sender
  Archive: MX_DEVICE:[MX.MLF.GNAFA]
  Description: Gruppo Nazionale Analisi Funzionale e sue Applicazioni
  Errors-to: robertini@vaxsns.sns.it
  Strip header: NOReceived, NOOther
  Private list: No
  Case sensitive: Yes
  Protection: (SYSTEM:RWED,OWNER:RWED,GROUP:RWED,WORLD:RWE)


everyone might define the "return address" in his Eudora Configuration (for
example) like: robertini@VAXSNS.SNS.IT and then send mail containing

remove GNAFA Sebastian@paris.fr
add GNAFA Lucio Dallara <LDallara@moon.sky>
QUIT

The solution is to modify the list owner to:
Robertini
for example, so that I have to connect first to VAX.SNS.IT before giving
privileged command. In fact defining such return address in Eudora cause an
error 501 trasferring the message to the popper (we use IUPOP) but,
and this is the question, I can't do it:

MCP> mod list gnafa /owner=Robertini
%MCP-E-INVADDR, invalid address specification: ROBERTINI
MCP>  Exit

Thank's you all in advance.


           Marco Robertini
Responsabile rete Scuola Normale Superiore
+39 50 509268             Robertini@sns.it


================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 05:05:31 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 10:30:52 GMT
From: paul@cca.ccagroup.co.uk
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: mx-list@wkuvx1.wku.edu
CC: paul@ccastat.demon.co.uk
Message-ID: <00992A5D.09C59840.6@ccastat.demon.co.uk>
Subject: MX V4.1 & Missing Logical

We've been having real problems with the SMTP agent - it kept falling over
shortly after starting up.

We finally traced the problem to a missing logical, MX_INET_HOST.

Does anyone know why this logical should be missing (it doesn't seem to be
mentioned in the documentation)?


Paul Bailey

System Manager


CCA Stationery Ltd

E-Mail: paul@ccagroup.co.uk
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 07:46:58 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 08:29:31 EDT
From: "Brian Tillman" <tillman@swdev.si.com>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
CC: paul@ccastat.demon.co.uk
Message-ID: <00992A4C.16786380.18@swdev.si.com>
Subject: RE: MX V4.1 & Missing Logical

Paul Bailey writes:

>We've been having real problems with the SMTP agent - it kept falling over
>shortly after starting up.
>
>We finally traced the problem to a missing logical, MX_INET_HOST.
>
>Does anyone know why this logical should be missing (it doesn't seem to be
>mentioned in the documentation)?

On the system at emy site that run MX, this logical name has never been defined 
and is not now defined.  Yet MX runs perfectly for me.  Perhaps this isn't 
really your problem.

By the way, SMTP_SERVER.EXE references this logical as well.
--
Brian
tillman_brian@si.com
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 09:16:35 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 09:16:12 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992A52.9B717E45.10@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: user list owner not possible (security problem)

Robertini@sns.it (Marco Robertini) writes:
>
>With this definition
>
>MCP> sh list gnafa
[...]
>  Owner: "robertini@VAXSNS.SNS.IT"
[...]
>everyone might define the "return address" in his Eudora Configuration (for
>example) like: robertini@VAXSNS.SNS.IT and then send mail containing
>
That is true (I guess; does that modify the "From:" line?).
Mail can be just as easily faked a number of other ways.

>The solution is to modify the list owner to:
>Robertini
>for example, so that I have to connect first to VAX.SNS.IT before giving
>privileged command. In fact defining such return address in Eudora cause an
>error 501 trasferring the message to the popper (we use IUPOP) but,
>and this is the question, I can't do it:
>
>MCP> mod list gnafa /owner=Robertini
>%MCP-E-INVADDR, invalid address specification: ROBERTINI
>MCP>  Exit
>
MCP requires a full RFC822 address for the owner (user@NODE).  Even if
you could do what you wanted, when the mail containing the commands
is sent to MX MLF, it's going to read <robertini@VAXSNS.SNS.IT>, not
just "Robertini", so it still wouldn't match.

I agree that this doesn't make for very secure lists, but they only
way around it is to allow managers to disable the ADD/REMOVE ability
and provide a utility to manage the lists locally.  That's on the wish
list, but I've had no time to do anything about it....

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
<goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
================================================================================
Archive-Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 09:56:20 CDT
Sender: owner-mx-list@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Date: Fri, 30 Jun 1995 09:55:58 CDT
From: Hunter Goatley <goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Reply-To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
To: MX-List@WKUVX1.WKU.EDU
Message-ID: <00992A58.29D8378C.1@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>
Subject: RE: MX V4.1 & Missing Logical

paul@cca.ccagroup.co.uk writes:
>
>We've been having real problems with the SMTP agent - it kept falling over
>shortly after starting up.
>
>We finally traced the problem to a missing logical, MX_INET_HOST.
>
>Does anyone know why this logical should be missing (it doesn't seem to be
>mentioned in the documentation)?
>
You're using UCX right?  The problem is that you are missing one of
the UCX logicals: UCX$INET_HOST or UCX$INET_DOMAIN.  If UCX is not
configured just so, one or both of those isn't defined and MX (NETLIB
actually) can't return the host name.

MX_INET_HOST is an undocumented logical, but it does serve to override
asking NETLIB to retrieve the host name.

Hunter
------
Hunter Goatley, Sr. Systems Analyst, The LOKI Group, Inc.
<goathunter@ALPHA.WKU.EDU>