Return-path: <alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>
Received: from sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV by SLUVCA.SLU.EDU (PMDF V5.0-4 #5070)
id <01HVTZI897Z48Y56IA_at_SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> for ALPHAOSF_at_SLUAVA.SLU.EDU; Fri,
29 Sep 1995 03:20:50 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from daemon_at_localhost) by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10)
id CAA17265 for aomaa; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:55:26 -0400
Received: from oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (oaunx1.ctd.ornl.gov [128.219.128.17])
by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id CAA17253 for
<alpha-osf-managers_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:55:23 -0400
Received: from arwen.unibe.ch by oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (8.6.10/3.0-C)
id CAA20707; Tue, 26 Sep 1995 02:55:22 -0400
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 1995 07:53:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Uehlinger Dominik <UEHLINGER_at_mph.unibe.ch>
Subject: [S][Q] Replacement of the LK421-AA keyboard
Sender: alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov
To: alpha-osf-managers_at_mph.unibe.ch
Cc: UEHLINGER_at_mph.unibe.ch
Reply-to: Uehlinger Dominik <UEHLINGER_at_mph.unibe.ch>
Reply-to: UEHLINGER_at_mph.unibe.ch
Message-id: <00996F6D.B2E10806.1_at_ubeclu.unibe.ch>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Followup-to: poster
Hi there,
[S] When I asked in january for a possible replacement solutions for the cheap
LK421-AA keyboard I got 2 answers telling me that the keyboard is actually
not that bad.
Since there seems to be at least one person out there who joins my feelings
about the LK421-AA keyboard let's try it again:
[Q] Does anybody know of a replacement solution for the LK421-AA ?
I have nothing against the layout of the LK421-AA! I just think that this
"thing" is more of an expander for my interdigital muscles than a keyboard
Thanks Dominik
Dominik E. Uehlinger, Div Nephrology, DIM, University of Berne, Switzerland
Received on Fri Sep 29 1995 - 14:23:46 NZST