[S] Tulip Ethernet Controller Collision Rate

From: Bivins, Jeff <BIVINS_at_nebeng.otis.utc.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 04:00:01 -0600 (CST)

Return-path: <alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>
Received: from sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV by SLUVCA.SLU.EDU (PMDF V5.0-4 #5070)
 id <01HVTZI897Z48Y56IA_at_SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> for ALPHAOSF_at_SLUAVA.SLU.EDU; Fri,
 29 Sep 1995 03:01:10 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from daemon_at_localhost) by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10)
 id KAA01567 for aomaa; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:09:28 -0400
Received: from oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (oaunx1.ctd.ornl.gov [128.219.128.17])
 by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id KAA01554 for
 <alpha-osf-managers_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:09:22 -0400
Received: from utrcgw.utc.com by oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (8.6.10/3.0-C)
 id KAA26059; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:09:20 -0400
Received: from bravo.otis.utc.com by utrcgw.utc.com (PMDF #2906 )
 id <01HVT0NUCIF400AHVZ_at_utrcgw.utc.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:07:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from eng1.otis.utc.com by bravo.otis.utc.com with SMTP; Thu,
 28 Sep 1995 10:06:08 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by eng1.otis.utc.com with Microsoft Mail id
 <306AD5EA_at_eng1.otis.utc.com>; Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:05:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 1995 10:02:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: "Bivins, Jeff" <BIVINS_at_nebeng.otis.utc.com>
Subject: [S] Tulip Ethernet Controller Collision Rate
Sender: alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov
To: alpha-osf-managers <alpha-osf-managers_at_ornl.gov>
Reply-to: "Bivins, Jeff" <BIVINS_at_nebeng.otis.utc.com>
Message-id: <306AD5EA_at_eng1.otis.utc.com>
X-Mailer: Microsoft Mail V3.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Encoding: 41 TEXT
Followup-to: poster


My Original question is:

> Hello all,
>
> I have 35 AlphaStation 250 4/266 workstations and 2 AlphaServer 2100 4/233

> servers. All of these machines have a DEC TULIP PCI ethernet card. When
> using the 'monitor' tool I see on the average 30-40 percent of collision
on
> a high throughput transfer.
>
> When I send a large file from on of these machine to a DECsystem 5900. The

> high collision rate only exist in the Alpha side and not the DECsystem
side.
>
>
> Is this a tuning issue ?

Nope. It's normal.

> How can I resolve this issue ?

Thanks to those who responded
     Matt Thomas
     Dave Cherkus
     J. Dean Brock
     Dave Golden


The consensus is that the TULIP controller reveals accurate statistics on
collisions, where the LANCE controller does not.

I will look at this problem from a network perspective.

Thanks,

Jeff
     
Received on Sat Sep 30 1995 - 07:29:01 NZST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Nov 08 2023 - 11:53:46 NZDT