mountd vs. ATM

From: <holtzman_at_mit.edu>
Date: Sat, 30 Sep 1995 06:51:40 -0600 (CST)

Return-path: <alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>
Received: from sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV by SLUVCA.SLU.EDU (PMDF V5.0-4 #5070)
 id <01HVV0YLJG0W8Y5DNP_at_SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> for ALPHAOSF_at_SLUAVA.SLU.EDU; Fri,
 29 Sep 1995 20:37:46 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from daemon_at_localhost) by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10)
 id HAA16258 for aomaa; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 07:00:53 -0400
Received: from oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (oaunx1.ctd.ornl.gov [128.219.128.17])
 by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id HAA16239 for
 <alpha-osf-managers_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 07:00:48 -0400
Received: from avb.slu.edu by oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (8.6.10/3.0-C)
 id HAA19030; Fri, 29 Sep 1995 07:00:46 -0400
Received: from DECNET-MAIL (SYSTEM_at_AVB) by SLUVCA.SLU.EDU (PMDF V5.0-4 #5070)
 id <01HVU1LGPFXSA3CA3E_at_SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> for alpha-osf-managers_at_ornl.gov; Fri,
 29 Sep 1995 03:45:29 -0600 (CST)
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 1995 03:45:29 -0600 (CST)
From: holtzman_at_mit.edu
Subject: mountd vs. ATM
Sender: alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov
To: alpha-osf-managers_at_ornl.gov
Reply-to: holtzman_at_mit.edu
Message-id: <01HVU1LHOJG2A3CA3E_at_SLUAVA.SLU.EDU>
Organization: SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY St. Louis, MO
X-VMS-To: IN%"alpha-osf-managers_at_ornl.gov"
X-VMS-Cc: IN%"jwojcik_at_media.mit.edu", IN%"holtzman_at_mit.edu"
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Followup-to: poster

Return-path: <alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>
Received: from sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV by SLUVCA.SLU.EDU (PMDF V5.0-4 #5070)
 id <01HVTZI897Z48Y56IA_at_SLUVCA.SLU.EDU> for ALPHAOSF_at_SLUAVA.SLU.EDU; Fri,
 29 Sep 1995 03:23:43 -0600 (CST)
Received: (from daemon_at_localhost) by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10)
 id PAA09801 for aomaa; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 15:03:07 -0400
Received: from oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (oaunx1.ctd.ornl.gov [128.219.128.17])
 by sws1.CTD.ORNL.GOV (8.6.10/8.6.10) with ESMTP id PAA09789 for
 <alpha-osf-managers_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov>; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 15:03:04 -0400
Received: from x.media.mit.edu by oaunx1.ctd.ornl.GOV (8.6.10/3.0-C)
 id PAA29218; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 15:03:03 -0400
Received: from localhost by x.media.mit.edu; (5.65/1.1.8.2/23May94-0218PM)
 id AA13401; Mon, 25 Sep 1995 15:02:15 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Sep 1995 15:02:15 -0400
From: holtzman_at_mit.edu
Subject: mountd vs. ATM
Sender: alpha-osf-managers-relay_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov
To: alpha-osf-managers_at_ornl.gov
Cc: jwojcik_at_media.mit.edu, holtzman_at_mit.edu
Reply-to: holtzman_at_mit.edu
Reply-to: holtzman_at_mit.edu
Message-id: <9509251902.AA13401_at_x.media.mit.edu>
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Followup-to: poster
X-MTS: smtp


We're beginning the deployment of an ATM network, and it seems that
ATM-based mount requests are hanging our Digital Unix mountd.

Here is the setup:

client (Solaris 2.4) <-> ATM switch (FORE) <-> router (WellFleet)
                                                 ^
                                                 |
                  /------ FDDI Concentrator<-----/
                  | |
                  | \->DEC 3000 AXP 800 running OSF/1 V3.2A
                  |
                  \->DEC 3000 AXP 600 running OSF/1 V2.1


When I tell the Sun to mount a filesystem on either the V2.1 or V3.2A
machine, the mountd on that machine wedges. It needs to be killed
and re-run for any mounts to work after that.

Has anybody seen anything like this, or know a solution?

-Henry
Received on Sat Sep 30 1995 - 21:00:03 NZST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Nov 08 2023 - 11:53:46 NZDT