Hello,
PROBLEM:
The /usr/.smdb./OSFBASE350.inv entry for /sbin/Rsh on all three of our DU
3.2G systems are the same. However, it is different from what a system at
CSC has. How is this possible? Are there different versions of OSFBASE350.inv?
CSC says that /sbin/Rsh should be a hard link to /sbin/sh. I believe CSC but
I am confused on how OSFBASE350.inv could be wrong. This is a factor if
trying to install 3.2G Patch 0117.00 (a.k.a., OSF375-350256). Note,
OSFBASE350.inv has the correct entries for /usr/bin/Rsh, and /usr/bin/sh.
FACTS:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
OSFBASE350.inv:0 221184 10078 3 4 100755 8/8/94 350 f./sbin/Rsh none OSFBASE350
OSFBASE350.inv:3 229376 36953 3 4 100755 7/24/95 350 f./sbin/sh none OSFBASE350
3104 -rwxr-xr-x 2 bin bin 131072 Jul 24 1995 /usr/bin/Rsh
3351 -rws--x--x 1 root bin 24576 Jul 24 1995 /usr/bin/rsh
3104 -rwxr-xr-x 2 bin bin 131072 Jul 24 1995 /usr/bin/sh
93 -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 221184 Aug 8 1994 /sbin/Rsh
55 -rwxr-xr-x 1 bin bin 229376 Jul 24 1995 /sbin/sh
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Regards,
Richard Jackson George Mason University
Computer Systems Senior Engineer UCIS / ISO
Computer Systems Engineering
Received on Thu Apr 10 1997 - 03:42:57 NZST