Response to: Possible pitfalls in DU 3.2c-> DU 4.0 upgrade?

From: Matthew Calthrop +44 (0) 171 542 5317 <"Matthew>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 1997 12:22:29 +0000 (GMT)

Steve/All,

I have been on a course detailing upgrading from 3.2x to 4.0/4.0a, and
I would strongly advise against upgrading to anything before 4.0b, as
4.0 is highly unstable, and 4.0a is not much better.

If you do decide to go to 4.0 or 4.0a, you would be best off
reinstalling the OS. One of the many pitfalls which aborts the upgrade
is if you have installed any kernel patches: you must restore all
original kernel object files, or the upgrade will fail. This may be
difficult/impossible if you have not been rigorous in keeping details
of patches installed.

Additionally, the course manual says that the following layerd
products must be removed from the system prior to performing the V4.0
update install (using setld -d <subset_name>):
        ASE - DECsafe Available Server
        DNA - DECnet
        IOS - Worldwide Language Support
        O3D - Open 3D
        TCR - TruCluster Software
To find the subset names, do a directory of
        /usr/.smdb./<SSCODE>*.lk
where SSCODE is the 3-character code in the list above.

If you have any more specific queries on differences, please let me
know.

regards,

Matt
matthew.calthrop_at_reuters.com

PS - could you put your email address on your submission? (It's not
included in the mail I receive from "alpha-osf-managers-relay").


=Dear managers..
=I'm wondering if there is anyone who's gone through an upgrade
=recently from Digital Unix 3.2c to Digital Unix 4.0. Any potential
=pitfalls that are avoidable?
=
=Let me know.
=
=Steve Timm
Received on Wed Jan 15 1997 - 13:46:44 NZDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Nov 08 2023 - 11:53:47 NZDT