putespwent() & copyespwent()

From: Douglas B. Jones <douglas_at_gpc.peachnet.edu>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 1998 15:48:05 -0400

Hi,

Hopefully these is ok to post here.

I am worried about the copyespwent() routine and
memory allocation or actually freeing. I do not have
a man page for it (for some reason), but according to
the Security book the call is:

copypr = copyespwent(origpr);

then when you are free, you have:

free(copypr);

Well, origpr and copypr are es_passwd which have a lot
of pointers in them. Just to do free(copypr) worries me.
This says free what copypr points to, not what its' elements
point to. The only way it would free all the memory is if
getespw*() or copyespwent() created a block of memory with
all of the elements in it. Or - am I missing something.

My other concern is putespwent() with a new id that does not
exist yet. If I am creating ids, it is easy to gen. for putpwent()
the passwd structure. Do I need to fill in all of the fields for
the es_passwd structure, or is there a way to get a default for
it an change the fd_name, fd_uid and fd_encrypt. Maybe also
fd_oldcrypt and any other site specific entries. My guess is:

while ((x = morelogins()) != NULL) {
        def = getesdfnam("default"); /* called each time we want a new def. */
        pr->sfld = def->sfld;
        pr->sflg = def->sflg;
        pr->ufld = def->prd;
        pr->uflg = def->prg;
        pr->ufld->fd_name = x->loginname;
        pr->uflg->fg_name = 1;
        pr->ufld->fd_uid = x->loginuid;
        pr->uflg->fg_uid = 1;
        pr->ufld->fd_encrypt = x->cryptedpw;
        pr->uflg->fg_encrypt = 1;
        pr->ufld->fd_oldcrypt = 0;
        pr->uflg->fg_oldcrypt = 1;
        /* any other fields.....*/
        putespwnam(loginname,pr); /* of course we check return here */
};

I guess I don't really need to get the default each time, in which case I
could take out some of the code above: uflg ones, fd_oldcypt and
fetesdfnam()
since they only need to be called once.

Is this the best way to do it, or is there a better way? Are there other
factors
I should consider?

I will be glad to summarize on both.
Thanks for any help,
Cheers,
Douglas
Received on Wed Jul 22 1998 - 19:49:17 NZST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Nov 08 2023 - 11:53:38 NZDT