You recently sent a message to the tru64-unix-managers mailing list
that appeared to be:
a reply to a message someone else sent to the list,
missing a "Subject" header,
a request to be added to, or removed from, the list, or
not appropriate for the list.
The tru64-unix-managers relay does not accept such messages and your
message will not be relayed to the entire list. If you are responding
to a message that someone else sent to the list, you should send mail
directly to that person and not copy it to the entire list. If it is a
message that you feel should be sent to the entire list, then please
mail it directly to the list.
To subscribe or unsubscribe from the list, send a message to:
majordomo_at_ornl.gov
containing one or more of the following commands in the BODY of the
message:
subscribe tru64-unix-managers
unsubscribe tru64-unix-managers
help
lists
If you have received this message in error or if this has
inconvenienced you in any way, then please accept my apologies.
Dave Sill (de5_at_ornl.gov)
Your message follows:
Received: (qmail 9257 invoked from network); 1 Apr 1999 15:53:46 -0000
Received: from oaunx2.ctd.ornl.gov (128.219.128.94)
by sws1.ctd.ornl.gov with SMTP; 1 Apr 1999 15:53:46 -0000
Received: from o05.xray.mpe.mpg.de (o05.xray.mpe.mpg.de [130.183.72.185])
by ornl.gov (PMDF V5.2-30 #32361) with SMTP id <0F9I00KBZPHHGL_at_ornl.gov> for
tru64-unix-managers_at_sws1.ctd.ornl.gov
(ORCPT rfc822;tru64-unix-managers_at_ornl.gov); Thu,
1 Apr 1999 10:53:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: (qmail 6760 invoked from network); Thu, 01 Apr 1999 15:53:40 +0000
Received: from o06.xray.mpe.mpg.de (130.183.72.186) by o05.xray.mpe.mpg.de with
SMTP; Thu, 01 Apr 1999 15:53:40 +0000
Received: by o06.xray.mpe.mpg.de (8.8.8) id RAA10256; Thu,
01 Apr 1999 17:53:40 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Thu, 01 Apr 1999 17:53:40 +0200
From: Achim Bohnet <ach_at_mpe.mpg.de>
X-Face:
#9R9$}Qu$q4/+(Y7T(Qfo8cup>^yR8B0wY4IH1)}*1E49K8~;Wi0PXITA"<<pYILk<cuT&8 )fK)zd6!$t\$BYyV>Pi3$mxf36$b1V'u?%-72[ax;U+^t~XCiBWd5:1aDjts)QDu_at_{p)e_at_Nou\8b}Z
_at_`+y-uk-i_7EhtDuv`v$vB0-\83`_-f{aXn%olFdX'UC\9Bl)_U-_,.UPZ9C?Q:E-r_at_(8/h#OJF8n+
OuC0Rl&[^vWU#enrm$xh&
Subject: Re: gcc2.8.1, gas, gld & DU 4.0d
In-reply-to: "Your message of Thu, 01 Apr 1999 10:16:25 CDT."
<99040110162504.14746_at_weba1.iname.net>
To: jburelbach_at_earthling.net
Cc: tru64-unix-managers_at_ornl.gov, jburelba_at_eos.nih.gov
Message-id: <199904011553.RAA10256_at_o06.xray.mpe.mpg.de>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-uri:
http://www.xray.mpe.mpg.de/~ach/
References: <99040110162504.14746_at_weba1.iname.net>
>>>jburelbach_at_earthling.net wrote:
>
> HELLLLP!!! Has anyone gotten gcc2.8.1 (or egcs 1.1.2) to build with libstdc++, gas, and gld? I
'm working on a DEC 1000A running 4.0D with patchkit 2. I've managed to build gcc with gas, b
ut gld doesn't work then. when I build without gas the Dec assembler barfs with "line too lon
g". with gas and Dec's linker I get stuff like:
Hi,
been there. Never want to the there again! When I try to configure binutils
it tells me that gas and gld is not supported on this architecture. I've
wasted a lot of time to try use gas nevertheless :-( My conclusion was
to not use gas at all.
The solution I've finally chosen is in the egcs FAQ. Here the short story:
o build and install binutils with same --prefix as later used by
egcs.
Why: Digital 'ar' had some problems that GNU ar does not have
o Build egcs with squashing on. See
http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#squangle
how to do this.
o Because of binary incompatibility of object formats with
sqangling on one should 'hard code' and -rpath to the linker.
See last three section of
http://egcs.cygnus.com/faq.html#rpath
Another note: AFAIR exceptions are not well supported on Digital Unix
by gcc and egcs. But I can't just find the reference. Nevertheless
the MICO configure script has test for broken exceptions and gcc 2.8.1
and egcs 1.1 failed these configure test (two month ago).
Hope this helps,
Achim
--
If you life in the Europian Union and you don't like spam then
support the petition:
Vote against Spam! http://www.politik-digital.de/spam/
Received on Thu Apr 01 1999 - 15:54:16 NZST