How Compaq sells a workstation

From: Arno Hahma <arno_at_utu.fi>
Date: Mon, 09 Aug 1999 23:12:32 +0300

I decided to post this here, since there are a lot of people, who might
be interested with this new situation of Compaq owning Digital. Back in
the "good old Digital days" this kind of horror did not happen.

ArNO
    2

---
This is a report of an XP1000 workstation delivery by Compaq.  There
is a lot of text, because there are so many aspects, that need
correction or that have been totally incompetently taken care of by
Compaq.
How Compaq makes an offer
In March, 1999 we decided to buy a new workstation for molecular
modelling and other scientific computing. We ended up with Compaq
XP1000 as the most suitable for our purposes based on information on
paper. The entire process really started on 29th of April, when we had
a meeting with Compaq salesperson and we specified, what the
workstation should include. We also agreed the delivery would be on
week 26 (28.6 - 4.7.99).
Here is the list of equipment we requested for the offer:
* EV6 21264 500 MHz or better CPU
* 1 GB of RAM
* 4 x 9 GB, 7200 RPM UW-SCSI disks, all internal
* DVD-drive, or if not possible, a CD-ROM
* 21" monitor with 1600x1200 capability at 70 Hz or better
* display adapter with full OpenGL support and 1600x1200 resolution
  or better
* second display adapter with 1600x1200 resolution, no OpenGL needed
* RAID controller, 2-channel, capable of RAID 5, 2 + 2 disks connected
* floppy disk drive, 3,5"
* DLT tape drive, 15 GB or better
* Unix license and CD (media)
* no installations of any software
* manuals for all pieces of hardware equipment
* keyboard and mouse
* audio device, 44,1 kHz samplerate, 16-bit stereo or better 
We were told the PowerStorm 300 can do up to 1920x1600 resolution and
that there is support for two adapters with PowerStorm models. However,
they were not sure, whether two different models can be connected to
the same computer (we asked for 4D20 or Elsa Gloria Synergy for the
second one) and promised to find it out and inform us, when they send
us their offer. 
Compaq promised the offer "in a few days". We waited a week and then we
called back. After two or three more phone calls we finally received an
offer from Compaq - two weeks later than promised.
Here's the list of goods in the offer:
* Compaq XP1000 Unix workstation, 500 MHz EV6 21264
* 1 GB of RAM 
* StorageWorks shelf for 8 disks
* cable for the StorageWorks
* 3-channel KZPAC RAID controller with battery backup
* 4 x 9.1 GB 7200 RPM disks
* PowerStorm 300 display adapter
* Compaq P110 monitor, 21" 1600x1200 max.
* tabletop DLT tape 35/70 GB
* cable for the DLT
* second SCSI-adapter for the DLT
* country kit
Looking at the offer, it is not what we requested for. We specifically
asked _not_ to use any external boxes for the disks, but to install all
disks internally to the XP1000 case - Compaq told us there is space for
four drives in there, which is so. Then where are the CD-drive, floppy,
audio, keyboard and mouse? We were able to guess the two latter are
probably in the country kit. Then searching with Altavista, we found a
document describing the XP1000 basic configuration and that includes
the CD, audio and floppy. Also, the second display adapter was not
there in this offer. They did not give any reason, why a DVD-drive
could not be included.
This kind of information should have been attached to the offer.
Otherwise, it is not possible for the customer to decode the cryptic
Compaq codes listed on the offer sheet. We had to spend about a day of
extra work trying to search for information about the parts listed in
the first offer.
The price for the RAM was about $5000 and that of the DLT about $5500.
These are outrageous prices for such equipment. Why on earth would we
need a 35 GB DLT if we only have 27 GB of disk in the planned RAID
configuration? Compaq did know this, we have a memo about the
negotiations with Compaq on 27.4.1999. The RAM is more than three times
more expensive than a reasonable street price for DIMM modules, which
we did point out in a phone conversation with Compaq Finland Oy.
Of course, we complained about the above offer and again, we waited for
more than a week for a reply. Finally they replied with a new offer:
* Compaq XP1000 Unix workstation, 500 MHz EV6 21264
* 1 GB of RAM, 8x128 MB modules 
* cable for the StorageWorks
* 3-channel RAID controller
* 4 x 9.1 GB 10000 RPM disks
* PowerStorm 300 display adapter
* Compaq P110 monitor, 21" 1600x1200 max.
* tabletop DLT tape 20/40 GB
* cable for the DLT
* second SCSI-adapter for the DLT
* country kit
Again, the offer was not what we asked for.  What are we going to do
with the Storageworks cable, if we don't buy the Storageworks shelf?
Also, why are the disks suddenly 10000 RPM and at twice the price
(nearly $1000 apiece), when we specifically requested for 7200 RPM
disks in the first place? The price for the DLT was in reasonable
bounds, so we accepted the 20 GB model.  Also, the RAM was only about
1,5 times more expensive than it should be, so we accepted that as
well. The PS300 display adapter also suddenly cost about $300 more than
in the previous offer. We accepted even that, since they told us it is
the right price and the previous one was wrong. We thought this extra
cost is not significant to the cost of the whole deal and accepted the
explanation.
At this point we were thinking if Compaq is even knowing themselves,
what kind of machines they have and what are they trying to sell us.
We also thought we must be crazy, when we deal with people like this,
all bells were ringing and warning us this is going to be one big
endless hassle. However, we still decided to pursue it, as we had
arrived this far already.
We wish to point out, that it is the task of the selling partner to
keep contact with the customer and not vice versa. During the entire
process, we have had to almost beg Compaq Finland to contact us and try
to sell us something. They have been very much ignorant about our
requests from the very beginning.
We called Compaq for about the tenth time and asked, why is the
extra cable still there? We also pointed out there was still no second
display adapter in the offer. Then we asked why the more expensive
disks? They couldn't give an answer and told us they'll look at it and
call back later.  We told them to change back the 7200 RPM drives and
add a second display adapter, unless there are some technical problems
with it. Compaq told us there is not. We never received any calls back,
but heard only afterwards, that the disks are "part of the basic
system" and the "offer would have to be completely rebuilt, if they
were changed".
Unfortunately, our order was placed (we were getting into a hurry)
before we reached anyone, who knows some real answers and then 
we decided to let it be, the 10000 RPM disks _are_ faster, though not
quite worth twice the price. The machine was still barely within the
budget, however, we didn't _have_ to use all the money for the
computer, but leave some for a slide scanner. Now, we couldn't buy the
scanner at all, just some faster disks instead.
The order was placed with on-site hardware installation included, not
including any software installations. The warranty was extended to
three years on-site, next day support.
How Compaq delivers
Week 26 came and went, but we did not receive the computer. We called
them again asking why and got some explanations about transports,
holidays, etc. etc. Then finally, the machine arrives on 8.7., but
without monitor and keyboard. They arrive after a few phone calls to
Compaq and five days later on 12.7. We call Compaq again and ask about
the installation of the hardware. They promise to send an engineer. We
wait again, but no engineer ever comes. Then we call the people in
charge of this purchase and ask, whether we still wait or shall we open
the case and install the parts.  They tell us to go ahead and install.
We open the cases and check all equipment and packing lists.  Otherwise
everything looks fine, but there are no microphone nor headphones,
although the parts lists say they should come with the XP1000. When we
call Compaq they tell us these parts are not necessarily included in
all computers they sell.  The question is, when are they and when not -
how can one use the audio device without headphones, speakers or
microphones? Why was this not told, when we ordered the computer?
There were no manuals of any kind shipped with the computer, except a
manual for "safe and comfortable working environment", which we really
do not need for anything. The only CD-disk with the shipment was about
a dozen versions old Multimedia Services CD. No O/S CD came with it,
although we specifically agreed we will do all software installations
ourselves. At this point, we guessed they have preinstalled the UNIX
despite of our agreement and not shipped the media.
Looking more carefully at the shipment, we found a slip stating, how
the preinstallation was done - onto a single disk leaving half of the
disk unused. 
At this point, alarm bells rings again. On a single disk? The machine
is supposed to be in a RAID 5 configuration, how did they actually
install the disks, how can the system even _find_ any disks, if they
didn't install the software for the RAID?  We boot the RAID
configuration utility. It reports no disks are found. Then we go and
open the case to see what's wrong in there.  The solution is very
simple: all disks had been connected into the motherboard
SCSI-controller. There were no cables installed to the RAID
controller.  Also, the battery backup wasn't installed, but was sitting
in a plastic bag in a separate packing. We installed the battery
backup, but couldn't connect the disks to RAID controller, since 
we didn't have a second cable.
Also, the motherboard controller type is LVD (which we find out by
searching with Altavista) and the RAID card is single ended. The
terminator at the end of the cable is different for these and we didn't
have extra UW-SCSI terminators at hand.
The worst of all, there were absolutely no useful manuals shipped with
the system. All debugging and troubleshooting was done by searching on
the Internet. Sometimes it worked, sometimes not. Compaq was of no
help, they simply did not know anything useful.
We e-mail Compaq and ask them to send an engineer with one internal
SCSI-cable and two internal, single ended terminators and the UNIX
CDs.  They start telling us the RAID installation is separate from the
machine and costs extra money. This sounds like cheating, it is like
buying a car without tires installed and paying extra to get them
installed.
A week passes.  We call Compaq again and they finally log a service
request. The engineer calls next day and asks, what the problem is
(again, we explain it, although we already sent them e-mail twice about
the problem). The engineer orders the spare parts. Then he finally
arrives (after a couple of days) and tells he only has one terminator.
We tell him to get another one. He gets it during the same day (it
_is_ possible to do something quickly and not always the next week or
the one after) and arrives with the parts. He brings one _external_
SCSI-cable and two _external_ terminators! Is Compaq still thinking we
have the StorageWorks box here?
We call Compaq and ask for INTERNAL terminators (which we already did
three times by e-mail and phone, but they still did not understand our 
writing or or words saying INTERNAL). They log the call and the same
engineer comes the next day with the correct parts. He installs the
cables, but is not able to configure the hard disks, because he has no
information about them. We fetch the information from Internet, from
Seagate home pages (the disks are Seagate 9LP) for him. Then he doesn't
have any jumpers to set the disks to single-ended mode (they were of
course in LVD mode, as they were in the motherboard controller; BTW,
can you tell us, how do LVD disks operate with Tru64 UNIX?). We dig
our spare part archives and give the serviceman some jumpers.  Finally,
we get the machine into a configuration, that we can start installing
the UNIX and other software.  But, there is just one problem: we do
not have any UNIX CDs! They forgot to send them with the serviceman.
How Compaq supports and services
Again, we call Compaq to send the CDs. They send them the next day and
we can start installing. First, we update the SRM Console (of course,
it was an old version). Then we install UNIX and Open3D 4.9.3 and all
the patches we can find on the Internet (duv0001 -set and security
patches, that is). The display adapter stays at 640x480 resolution. We
call Compaq and ask why, they don't know and UNIX or Open3D
documentation tell us nothing. Then we go back to Altavista and search
Internet. Surprise, Open3D does not include drivers for PowerStorm
300!
We finally manage to get the drivers at some ftp-site, download the
Open3D 4.9.5 and install it. Finally, we are able to get 1280x1024
resolution. However, we cannot get the card go up to 1600x1200 no
matter what we do with -screen0 switches etc. undocumented methods,
that we dig out of alpha-osf-managers mailing list archives on
Internet.
Once again, we call Compaq and ask why. They don't know. At this point,
Compaq support is getting drastically worse. They decline almose any
questions and stop replying e-mail messages in a decent time.
Next, we search Internet again. In a small text in a PDF file we find,
that PowerStorm 300 only supports up to 1280x1024. A $2000 card cannot
do better and we were told it can do 1920x1600! And we have two of
these in the machine in question.
About the two monitor support, we cannot get windows to the other
monitor, only the screensaver works on both CRTs. We install PanoramiX,
after searching the Internet once again (Compaq didn't know anything,
what to do). PanoramiX only gives an error message "Cannot find display
adapters" or similar and monitors stay black in text mode. We call
Compaq and they don't know anything. We search with Altavista and find
a PDF-file.  In that file, we find with a small print in a footnote:
"PowerStorm 300 in Tru64 Unix only works as separate screens, PanoramiX
is not supported."
They sell us a system with no software support! Are we supposed to code
the drivers ourselves? This information should have been very clear at
the very beginning of the process. We would have saved about a week
worth of work and many calls back to Compaq. In addition, we would not
have ordered two display adapters, had we known there is really no
support for them.
We go on setting up the system, as it is late by months.  The
installation of the UNIX goes fine, but the installation of some
subsets hang the machine up. We troubleshoot the machine for about a
week, until we find out the CD-ROM is causing the problems. The machine
does not reboot, but hangs to some strange CAM SCSI error messages, if
CD-ROM is attached to the system.  When we pull the data cable out of
the IDE-controller, all problems vanish. We cannot imagine a reputable
company like Compaq could ever plug an AT-IDE device into a $25000
computer system. This indicates a fair degree of incompetency.
If the CD-drive is used under heavy load, the machine panics or hangs.
This apparently happens, because the IDE CD inhibits the use of
SCSI-bus.  Then the use of swap is inhibited, the kernel thinks the
disks are unaccessible and halts the system.
Again, we call Compaq service and tell them to come and replace the
CD-ROM to a SCSI CD-ROM. They do nothing. We e-mail again and they
suggest us to install the latest patches. We tell them this was done
before anything else. Only after some calls from our financial
department they agree to change the CD.  To date, they haven't sent
any CD-drive nor engineers nor even contacted us, we are still waiting
for them to repair this machine - almost two weeks has passed from
their promises by the time of writing of this text.
The display problem still persists. We cannot get anything onto the
second monitor, because there isn't software support for it.  Compaq
hasn't done anything to fix that. We have given them two options:
exchange the two PS300s to one PS350 _or_ get us a license of X-big-X
(http://www.x-software.com/Software/Xbigx/info.english.html) software,
which does have a driver to handle two screens. A third option is of
course, that we return this workstation and get one from some
manufacturer, who can do a more decent job with it.
We wish the hardware was the only problem, but no. Many system
libraries are missing and cannot be found anywhere on the installation
CDs (libdps.so, libnls, for instance). A lot of software, that compile
out of the box on EV56 21164 Tru64 Unix 4.0f, does not compile on
XP1000 with the same O/S version. This is random, some packages compile
fine, some do not. New problems are found almost every day and for some
of them we have found workarounds. Software from Tru64 Unix 4.0e often
does not work as such, but complains of some missing library or program
symbol.
In addition to that, the user interface is poor and its maintenance is
a pain compared to any other vendor's CDE implementations. For
instance, to update the bug-infested netscape shipped with the system
to the latest version and integrate it to CDE, one has to go in and
edit some Xresource files or unconditionally overwrite the system
netscape installation.  The latter is not a good choice, since it can
inhibit patch installation or cause similar problems later. 
The above procedure is about as difficult as it can get - decent
systems allow such changes by clicking some CDE icons and filling in
graphical forms. Most of the administration tools under CDE are a
bad joke, that gives cryptic error messages when started.
Alternatively, they start a text window with a text based tool in it -
what is the point, you could enter such commands from command line in a
terminal window.  Regarding CDE and user interface, Compaq is where
others were in the days of the birth of CDE.
The networking software in Tru64 Unix is almost unusable for any
serious work. Automounter is archaic, there is no NFS buffering
capability (CacheFS or equivalent), no routing possibility within the
same subnetwork, no possibility to do NAT (IP masquerading) either,
modem support is very poor, etc. etc. etc. 
CD-ROM support is archaic.  First one looks at /dev -directory and
guesses, which one of the cryptic rz-codes means cd-rom. Then you log
in as root and mount the correct node manually, not forgetting the -o
ro -switch, it is self evident, of course. When you mount the CD, you
have to guess, whether there is a filesystem on some of the
subpartitions or is it a filesystem directly on the raw device rz?c.
Normally, there are no documentation or instructions how to do this.
On competitive systems, you insert the CD and wait a few seconds. Then
a file manager pops up on your screen and the CD is mounted somewhere,
that you don't have to care about, you only access the files with your
mouse clicks. When you finish, you press the eject button on the file
manager, CD ejects automatically from the drive and file manager window
disappears.
As a last issue, Compaq Finland seems to know far less about Compaq equipment
than we do. It is usually expected the manufacturer or importer is the
main source of information in all technical matters regarding their
equipment. In this case, this does not hold, but we have been forced to
search for information everywhere else but Compaq Finland Oy.
To summarize: the purchase of the XP1000 workstation was one big
mistake and we are already considering of calling the deal and getting
some other workstation in replacement.
Compaq has: 
* failed several times to give us a proper offer according to our
  request
* failed to state, whether there are technical problems in any
  configuration we requested for
* directly lied us about the capabilities of the system in question in 
  several aspects. In a courtroom, this would be deemed a fraud.
* tried to sell us the most expensive equipment available even
  if a more economical solution is as good or better. We can also
  call this an attempt to fraud.
* failed to correct their mistakes and repair the equipment
* failed to fulfill the terms of our warranty agreement (on-site,
  next day support)
* failed to deliver the equipment in time 
* failed to deliver all components (this hasn't been
  corrected even yet)
* failed to supply us with necessary documentation
* failed to supply us with software needed to run the equipment
  and that is included with the system
* failed to install the hardware contrary to agreement
* delayed all replies beyond reasonable amounts of time
* failed to deliver the equipment in a working condition
* refused to replace defective parts
 
* failed to give us any useful support regarding hardware, software or
  any other matter concerning the equipment
All this happened with Compaq Finland Oy and Novosys Oy, through whom
Compaq delivered the machine. Novosys immediately called all
responsibility and told us to contact Compaq Finland Oy in all
questions.
Yours,
Arno Hahma
University of Turku
Department of Chemistry
SF-20014 TURKU
FINLAND
E-mail: arno_at_utu.fi
Phone: +358 2 333 6757
FAX:   +358 2 333 6700
--
ArNO
    2
Received on Mon Aug 09 1999 - 20:15:59 NZST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Nov 08 2023 - 11:53:39 NZDT