Dear managers,
we are using a HSZ50 with four raidsets. Two with 6 RZ1CB-CA (FW LYJ0) each and
two with 6 RZ29B-VW (FW 0016) each.
Recently the following error-massages occured several times on the console of
the HSZ50 along with ADVFS-errors and entries in the binary.errlog:
19:06:51 R06_HSZ_C>
22:16:21
22:16:21 %EVL--R06_HSZ_C> --13-JAN-1946 08:19:41 (time not set)-- Instance
Code: 0252000A
22:16:21 Template: 81.(51)
22:16:21 Power On Time: 0. Years, 199. Days, 20. Hours, 14. Minutes, 22.
Seconds
22:16:21 Controller Model: HSZ50-AX
22:16:21 Serial Number: ZG71325301 Hardware Version: A01(01)
22:16:21 Firmware Version: V51Z(51)
22:16:21 Informational Report
22:16:21 Unit Number: 101.(0065)
22:16:21 Unit Software Version: 1.(01) Unit Hardware Version: 48.(30)
22:16:21 Retry Level: 1. Retries: 1.
22:16:21 Port: 2. Target: 2. LUN: 0.
22:16:21 SCSI Device Type: 0.(00)
22:16:21 Device ID: "RZ1CB-CA (C) DEC" Device Serial Number: "15311852"
22:16:22 Device Firmware Revision Level: "LYJ0"
22:16:22 SCSI Command Opcode: 40.(28)
22:16:22 Sense Data Qualifiers: 0.(00)
22:16:22 SCSI Sense Data:
22:16:22 Error Code: 112.(70) {current command execution}
22:16:22 Information field is valid
22:16:22 Segment: 0.(00)
22:16:22 Sense Key: 3.(03) MEDIUM ERROR
22:16:22 ILI: 0 EOM: 0 FM: 0
22:16:22 Information: 809B8301
22:16:22 Additional Sense Length: 10.(0A)
22:16:22 Command-Specific Information: 00000000
22:16:22 ASC: 128.(80) ASCQ: 0.(00)
22:16:22 FRU: 0.(00) Sense-Key Specific: 000000
22:16:22 Instance Code: 0252000A
22:16:22 R06_HSZ_C>
(Alpha 4100 with DU 3.2F)
Digital CSC stated that the HSOF Version 5.0 is not supported with RZ1CB
drives.
So we replaced it yesterday with HSOF 5.1, but - same errors this morning and a
broken datafile in our oracle 7.2.3 database.
Replacing the unit at Port: 2. Target: 2. LUN: 0. with a hotspare did not solve
the problem, the "MEDIUM ERROR" occured immediately on the newly inserted disk.
CSC suggested to delete and reinit all raidsets with the new HSOF.
Will that solve the problem?
We are reluctant because of the 40 GB of data that would have to be restored
so I would like to hear if someone had encountered similar problems.
Thanks in advance
Peter Braack
Degussa AG, Fachbereich Informatik, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
Peter.Braack_at_degussa.de
Received on Tue Nov 18 1997 - 13:06:09 NZDT