SUMMARY: SYSCHECK 119: wrong results on ES40 T64 5.0a

From: <emanuele.lombardi_at_casaccia.enea.it>
Date: Tue, 24 Oct 2000 10:07:31 +0200 (MET DST)

Dear friends,

I'm sorry to mail the most useless summary, but the errors I reported
are disappeared and I don't know exactely why.
One of the many things I did before realizing sys_check was fine is
        /usr/sbin/desta bldknw
but I'm not sure it really was the solution.

Thanks to Ed Riopelle - sys_check support Compaq - who asked for a log
of the faulty sys_check to study.

Emanuele

-- 
$$$ Emanuele Lombardi
$$$ mail:  AMB-GEM-CLIM ENEA Casaccia
$$$        I-00060 S.M. di Galeria (RM)  ITALY
$$$ mailto:emanuele.lombardi_at_casaccia.enea.it
$$$ tel	+39 06 30483366 fax	+39 06 30483591
$$$
$$$                                |||
$$$                                \|/  ;_;
$$$ What does a process need        |   /"\
$$$ to become a daemon ?            |   \v/
$$$                                 |    | 
$$$ - a fork                        o---/!\---
$$$                                 |   |_|
$$$                                 |  _/ \_
$$$* Contrary to popular belief, UNIX is user friendly.
$$$  It's just very particular about who it makes friends with.
$$$* Computers are not intelligent, but they think they are. 
$$$* True programmers never die, they just branch to an odd address
$$$* THIS TRANSMISSION WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY 100% RECYCLED ELECTRONS

Received on Tue Oct 24 2000 - 08:09:06 NZDT