I'm in the process of installing OSF/1 v3.0B on a number of new
AlphaStations we just received. I went to look at my mail, and
was shocked to find this:
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 17:37:21 -0800
> From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <postmaster_at_phy.ucsf.edu>
> To: root_at_phy.ucsf.edu
> Subject: Returned mail: Host unknown
>
> ----- Transcript of session follows -----
> 550 sdesv1.enet.dec.com (tcp)... 550 Host unknown
> 554 ladebuginstall_at_sdesv1.ENET.dec.com... 550 Host unknown (Authoritative answer from name server)
>
> ----- Unsent message follows -----
> Received: by mingus.ucsf.edu (5.65/GSC4.24)
> id AA02035 for ladebuginstall_at_sdesv1.enet.dec.com; Fri, 3 Feb 1995 17:37:21 -0800
> Date: Fri, 3 Feb 1995 17:37:21 -0800
> From: root (system PRIVILEGED account)
> Message-Id: <9502040137.AA02035_at_mingus.ucsf.edu>
> Subject: Installation of DECladebug version 3.0-9 on OSF1 mingus.ucsf.edu V3.0 358.78 alpha
> Apparently-To: ladebuginstall_at_sdesv1.enet.dec.com
So is it the policy of DEC to surreptitiously send mail informing them
of what we do on our machines? How many other things like this are
going on behind my back?
Jim Wright Keck Center for Integrative Neuroscience
jwright_at_keck.ucsf.edu Department of Physiology, Box 0444
voice 415-502-4874 513 Parnassus Ave, Room HSE-811
fax 415-502-4848 UCSF, San Francisco, CA 94143-0444
Received on Fri Feb 03 1995 - 21:40:16 NZDT