routing issue with 2nd NIC

From: George Gallen <ggallen_at_slackinc.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Oct 2000 13:12:18 -0400

I added in the second NIC to allow isolating printers. I'm now
in the phase of testing the NIC.

                       (10.10.155.24) sl0
                              ||
                              || (modem)
                              ||
                           sl0 (10.10.150.25)
       100mbs |
       NIC#2 (10.10.150.29) -[2100]- NIC#1 (10.10.150.30)
        | |
        |---[5 port 10/100 switch] [10.10.150.x hubs]
 10mbs | |
[16 port hub] --+ [switch to 10.10.x.x]
  | \
  | `--10.10.150.23
10.10.150.26

Since the tu1 is set at 100, I needed to use a 10/100 switch
to allow the 10only hub to be hooked to this NIC lan.

Below are the routing tables I currently use:

Route Tree for Protocol Family 2:
default 10.10.1.1 UG 0 3475 tu0
10 10.10.150.30 U 36 68860 tu0
10.10.155.24 10.10.150.25 UH 2 1658 sl0
10.10.155.26 10.10.150.25 UH 0 0 sl0
10.10.155.27 10.10.150.25 UH 0 27 sl0
10.10.155.29 10.10.150.25 UH 0 0 sl0
127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 UH 6 5774 lo0

Basically, If the address isn't a 10 or one of the 10. series
then I want it to to 10.10.1.1 (gw) to the internet, out to
the intranet if it's a 10. and to the slip port if it's one of
the 10.10.155.x

My ifconfig for tu0
 tu0: flags=c63<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST,SIMPLEX>
     inet 10.10.150.30 netmask ff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255 ipmtu 1500

My ifconfig for tu1 (DE-500-AA)
  tu1: flags=c63<UP,BROADCAST,NOTRAILERS,RUNNING,MULTICAST,SIMPLEX>
     inet 10.10.150.29 netmask ff000000 broadcast 10.255.255.255 ipmtu 1500

When I connect the tu1 port to the switch, the connection light goes on
and the 100mbs light goes on (ewb0_mode is set to fast). And I set the
speed for tu1 to be 100 using ifconfig. (when I set tu1 for fastfd, the
Full duplex light did NOT go on..not sure why), so I'm sticking with half.

I first added in:

10.10.150.29 10.10.150.29 UH 0 0 tu1
10.10.150.26 10.10.150.29 UH 0 0 tu1
10.10.150.23 10.10.150.29 UH 0 0 tu1

Now, If I ping 10.10.150.29 (the card), I get a positive response (although
the lights on the switch the card is hooked to doesn't blink). If I ping
10.10.150.26 or 10.10.150.23, I get nothing back, not even any blinking on
the switch (to show traffic). Occaisionally, there is a blink on the switch
and a corresponding tcpdump show a LAT packet, I don't have tcpdump setup
on the linux machine so I can't verify that it made it out of the switch.

On the 10.10.150.26 machine (linux), I have a route setup as:

10.10.150.0 10.10.150.29 ugh 0 0 eth0

If from the linux machine above, I do a ping 10.10.150.29 (the 2nd NIC)
I get blinking on the switch for both the hub end and the 2nd NIC, but
tcpdump isn't showing any traffic on tu1

Is my routing setup properly? or might there be a problem with NIC?

George
         



George Gallen
Senior Programmer/Analyst
Accounting/Data Division
ggallen_at_slackinc.com
ph:856.848.1000 Ext 220

SLACK Incorporated - An innovative information, education and management
company
http://www.slackinc.com
Received on Thu Oct 05 2000 - 17:13:20 NZDT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed Nov 08 2023 - 11:53:41 NZDT